Jump to content

User talk:64.16.53.122: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Your recent edits to Specified complexity
 
Antwort
 
Line 1: Line 1:


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Moriwen|Moriwen]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. Your recent edit to [[:Specified complexity]] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Moriwen|my talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> — [[User:Moriwen|Moriwen]] ([[User talk:Moriwen|talk]]) 03:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Moriwen|Moriwen]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. Your recent edit to [[:Specified complexity]] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Moriwen|my talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> — [[User:Moriwen|Moriwen]] ([[User talk:Moriwen|talk]]) 03:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

:Moriwen. My apologies if this edit seemed unneutral. Is it justified to call this theory a pseudoscience if neutrality is the goal? It is an observable theory. I don't see evolution marked as a pseudoscience even though it has yet to be tested, observed, or proven. Potentially some bias has made its way into this theory. Curios to your response Moriwen.
:P.S I am challenging you on this but by no means intend to cause offense, truth is my goal. [[Special:Contributions/64.16.53.122|64.16.53.122]] ([[User talk:64.16.53.122#top|talk]]) 03:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:30, 6 September 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Moriwen. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Specified complexity seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Moriwen (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moriwen. My apologies if this edit seemed unneutral. Is it justified to call this theory a pseudoscience if neutrality is the goal? It is an observable theory. I don't see evolution marked as a pseudoscience even though it has yet to be tested, observed, or proven. Potentially some bias has made its way into this theory. Curios to your response Moriwen.
P.S I am challenging you on this but by no means intend to cause offense, truth is my goal. 64.16.53.122 (talk) 03:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]