Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 20 in South Carolina: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: Line 25:
If there’s a future section on the main page of I-20 about the eastern extension, then the S.C. page should have one too. I know there’s one in “Proposed extensions.” But we or I or you could move or duplicate it to the future section only about 2003 extension since it will happen soon eventually since there are many sites including interstate sites except wiki that the extension is going to happen, two of the sites (interstate guide and aaroads) have exact directions of how the extension will be like. Also new interstate shields in S.C. don’t have “South Carolina” above the numbers anymore. [[User:Foxbro69|Foxbro69]] ([[User talk:Foxbro69|talk]]) 19:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
If there’s a future section on the main page of I-20 about the eastern extension, then the S.C. page should have one too. I know there’s one in “Proposed extensions.” But we or I or you could move or duplicate it to the future section only about 2003 extension since it will happen soon eventually since there are many sites including interstate sites except wiki that the extension is going to happen, two of the sites (interstate guide and aaroads) have exact directions of how the extension will be like. Also new interstate shields in S.C. don’t have “South Carolina” above the numbers anymore. [[User:Foxbro69|Foxbro69]] ([[User talk:Foxbro69|talk]]) 19:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
:The I-20 main page on future extension is out-dated. There are currently no plans to extend I-20 east. Unless you can provide new information, the proposed routing is dead, that is why it is in the history section in this article. --[[User:Washuotaku|WashuOtaku]] ([[User talk:Washuotaku|talk]]) 19:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
:The I-20 main page on future extension is out-dated. There are currently no plans to extend I-20 east. Unless you can provide new information, the proposed routing is dead, that is why it is in the history section in this article. --[[User:Washuotaku|WashuOtaku]] ([[User talk:Washuotaku|talk]]) 19:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
:@[[User:Foxbro69|Foxbro69]] (pinging @[[User:Washuotaku|Washuotaku]] as well), please discuss what you are trying to do here rather than declaring your edits as "perfect". This clearly started with you trying to [[WP:POINT|make a point]] toward Washuotaku and it would be nice if all this could be sorted out without getting more admins involved.   –[[User:Skywatcher68|Skywatcher68]] ([[User talk:Skywatcher68|talk]]) 02:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:06, 11 September 2023

WikiProject iconU.S. Roads: Interstates / South Carolina C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics
Locations
Note icon
This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
Note icon
This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
Note icon
This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
 
WikiProject iconUnited States: South Carolina C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 20 in South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rest areas and weigh stations

Like Interstate 26 in South Carolina, this could use a section in the route description for rest areas and truck weigh stations. I've got one site listing rest areas and one site listing weigh stations. If we can find closed ones of either for the section, that'd be great too. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That reminds me that I still got to process those pictures I took at the I-20 rest areas at Lugoff. I'm fine with what you did by adding a subsection called 'services' and listing them; but I recall attempting similar several years back and they were removed because they weren't considered necessary for the general public. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I believe the problem you had was that I was adding them to the junction list for Interstate 85 in South Carolina. But the "services" section was also part of the route description along Interstate 95 in South Carolina, and most people seem okay with that. Either way, only I-26 seems to be the one to fill in now. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 20 Eastern Extension In The Future Section

If there’s a future section on the main page of I-20 about the eastern extension, then the S.C. page should have one too. I know there’s one in “Proposed extensions.” But we or I or you could move or duplicate it to the future section only about 2003 extension since it will happen soon eventually since there are many sites including interstate sites except wiki that the extension is going to happen, two of the sites (interstate guide and aaroads) have exact directions of how the extension will be like. Also new interstate shields in S.C. don’t have “South Carolina” above the numbers anymore. Foxbro69 (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The I-20 main page on future extension is out-dated. There are currently no plans to extend I-20 east. Unless you can provide new information, the proposed routing is dead, that is why it is in the history section in this article. --WashuOtaku (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Foxbro69 (pinging @Washuotaku as well), please discuss what you are trying to do here rather than declaring your edits as "perfect". This clearly started with you trying to make a point toward Washuotaku and it would be nice if all this could be sorted out without getting more admins involved.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]