User talk:Death Editor 2

Welcome!

Hello Death Editor 2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! User:Chongkian (talk) 06:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Thank you! Death Editor 2 (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

WP:BLP violations and editing with sources

Hi @Death Editor 2:, I noticed that you are adding death information to biographies on here without adding reliable sources. Simply copying url links into the summary box of your edit is not sufficient, the page itself must be referenced with reliable sources (read WP:RS if unsure) in all instances of displaying death information for subjects (i.e. infobox, lede, main body OR categories at the foot of the page). To not do this, and edit as you have done here is a serious violation. Hope you understand and that you'll use sources in future. Thanks Jkaharper (talk) 09:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Generalrelative (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vichy France. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

But Vichy france was quite literally fascist, it was lead by a fascist, had fascists in government, and was a puppet state of nazi germany, a well known fascist state. Death Editor 2 (talk) 03:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vichy France. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Tell me why Vichy France isn't fascist, when it was lead by a fascist, had a fascist government, and was a puppet state of another fascist regime. Death Editor 2 (talk) 03:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Weldon Olson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 01:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Than remove his death from 2023 deaths page. Death Editor 2 (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Rashid died on May 18th of this year actually

The information you wrote of his death date is wrong 2600:1014:B00F:16A0:4195:3828:7BB:A88D (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you random BoN! Death Editor 2 (talk) 02:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ella Stack

On 25 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ella Stack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:29, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Harald zur Hausen

On 1 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Harald zur Hausen, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Jessie Maple

On 5 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jessie Maple, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Robert Holmes Bell

On 15 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Robert Holmes Bell, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 03:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Danny Masterson, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. glman (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

He is literally in prison, he is a FORMER american actor. Death Editor 2 (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Historical accuracy

I reverted your removal of the "Historical accuracy" section at Valkyrie (film). Such sections are completely appropriate for historical films. See WP:FILMHIST. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring in the article Yaroslav Hunka

Please, cease your edit war in the article about Yaroslav Hunka. Wikipedia rule WP:BLP specifically says that: "BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement".

By categorizing this article into "white supremacists" category, you are adding a very controversial statement, ungrounded in any secondary reliable source, which could harm a living person. This directly violates a number of Wikipedia rules. --Amakuha (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I want you to calmly and kindly explain to me why a member of the literal paramilitary branch of the NSDAP wasn't a white supremacist. Death Editor 2 (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

You are thinking too much. In Wikipedia, editors don't think much. We simply take reliable secondary sources which state something like "Mr. N is a Canadian white supremacist". Then we copy such statement to Wikipedia and we provide a reference. That's it.

If you don't have a source which says exactly this then such category is unwarranted. Especially because this made up claim is about a living person. --Amakuha (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Death Editor 2, you are being asked: don't think for yourself, and that's not even meant as irony! --87.170.197.110 (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Starship Flight Tests Article

Your edits to change the number of planned flight tests from 2 to 1 with a clear consensus against you constitutes vandalism. Please stop. Redacted II (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

You said and I quote "Sure. The NASA Commercial LEO Development page for SpaceX had the first payload Q1 2024 (the site was taken down later, or at least the bookmark I had made is now broken)." Can you see the problem? Death Editor 2 (talk) 15:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

The consensus is against you (out of the 4 editors to comment, 3 were against you), so that changes nothing.

You also have a large history of policy violation (this is the 6th warning you have received).

So, consider this your last warning. Redacted II (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

"(Moving to the left) I don't see how flight 4 planned for Q1 2024 would imply flight 3 to happen in 2023. If the second flight is successful, it's even possible SpaceX does not launch S26 at all and goes directly to S28. A third flight in 2023 looks very unlikely now, but I don't mind either way for the graph." Another quote from another editor who does not really care either way, so it does not seem like 3 people are against me, just you. Death Editor 2 (talk) 15:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

1: When a consensus cannot be reached, the status quo is maintained. So even if there isn't a consensus, then your edits still constitute vandalism.

2: "With New Year's eve being more than 3 months away and the precedence of flights happening days after receipt of permit, I would say to keep the table as is for now. Lklundin (talk) 18:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)"

No one has taken your side here. So stop. Redacted II (talk) 15:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

New year's eve is less than three months away, and given your source has been taken down I am simply following the logical conclusion that only one more flight will happen in 2023, maybe. Death Editor 2 (talk) 16:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

That's called Original Research. I recommend reading the attached policy. Redacted II (talk) 16:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Do you have a source that hadn't been taken down? Death Editor 2 (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source that directly states "there will only be two flights in 2023"?

I'd love to see one. Redacted II (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

1. the first flight was called the SpaceX Starship Integrated Flight Test.

2. I don't, but I do have a source that says the next test flight might happen in 2024 that you removed for some reason. Death Editor 2 (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

I removed it because the listed date was NET. No Earlier Than. Adding on the 2024 note was pointless.

And what even is the point of "1. the first flight was called the SpaceX Starship Integrated Flight Test."? Redacted II (talk) 16:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Because one flight definitely happened in 2023, and the second flight in 2023 is highly unlikely maybe. Death Editor 2 (talk) 16:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your sources didn't state what your saying. They stated that it might, not that it's likely or unlikely. Redacted II (talk) 17:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

anyways none of this matters, the third flight is made up with no sources what so ever. Death Editor 2 (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

That doesn't negate that you made several edits in violation of a consensus, then readded them after they were reverted. Redacted II (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

alright, I will ask for Consensus. Death Editor 2 (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Shifting left.

You can't just ask for a consensus. A consensus is formed by an agreement between editors. Currently, that agreement is against you. So please, self-revert your edits. Redacted II (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

You possibly made up a source and that fact wasn't known to other editors at the time. Death Editor 2 (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

I just checked the source again and it's back online. It's right here:[1].

It is out of date, though (it listed Q3 2023 for IFT-2). Redacted II (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

If it's out of date, than it cannot be used. Death Editor 2 (talk) 17:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

If one piece of the source is out of date, that does not invalidate the entire source.

For example:

In the SpaceX Super Heavy article, citation 41 is a tweet from Elon, stating "Final decision made earlier this week on booster engine count. Will be 33 at ~230 (half million lbs) sea-level thrust". However, the thrust per engine was later changed to 269 tons per engine. The source is still useful, as it states the final decision on the engine count of the booster. Redacted II (talk) 18:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

embarrassing that we are using Elon Musk as a source. Also it invalidates your entire point that the third flight is going to be in 2023 Q4! Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

How does it invalidate the point that the third flight is going to be in 2023 Q4? Redacted II (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Because it obviously has been pushed back if the second flight is happening in 2023 Q4. Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

It's a delay of roughly 1 month. And that's not really how SpaceX operates.

B10 is receiving engines (so is S28), S29 has underwent cryogenic testing, and S26 is awaiting static fire testing. So a delay to IFT-2 doesn't mean a delay to IFT-3. Redacted II (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

The second launch isn't going this year to happen due to the wildlife agency not approving their launch. So the third launch is literally impossible. Death Editor 2 (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

No...

As I said on August 25, "Permission to fly wasn't granted until 6 days before IFT-1 (and 3 days before the first attempt). Removing the graph because they don't have approval would make no sense whatsoever"

The FWS investigation could conclude this month, or next month. Just because the flight doesn't have the license doesn't mean it isn't planned.

But this is the wrong place to have this debate. It belongs here. Redacted II (talk) 18:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

ANI report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Redacted II (talk) 20:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

?????? Death Editor 2 (talk) 23:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

I think you may need to properly fill it out. Death Editor 2 (talk) 23:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023, content removal

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kfar Aza massacre, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)