User talk:LucasFR.pr: Difference between revisions
Animalparty (talk | contribs) Welcome to Wikipedia! |
General note: Adding original research on Zhong Yusen. |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:Hello, I just added some links. I hope it's ok now. Regarding another subject, I also created a new page, it is now a draft and I don't know who I can talk to to publish it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zhou_Yusen |
:Hello, I just added some links. I hope it's ok now. Regarding another subject, I also created a new page, it is now a draft and I don't know who I can talk to to publish it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zhou_Yusen |
||
:Maybe you can point me in some direction? Thank you [[User:LucasFR.pr|LucasFR.pr]] ([[User talk:LucasFR.pr#top|talk]]) 02:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC) |
:Maybe you can point me in some direction? Thank you [[User:LucasFR.pr|LucasFR.pr]] ([[User talk:LucasFR.pr#top|talk]]) 02:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
== January 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Help:Getting started|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/LucasFR.pr|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:Zhong Yusen]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|tutorial on citing sources]]. ''Patents and non-RSes like The Daily Mail and The NYPost are not reliable and should not be used. Content based on them may contain original research as a result, and should be discouraged. Please stick to reliable sources.''<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> — [[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 01:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:14, 15 January 2024
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LucasFR.pr! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
July 2023
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Acmella oleracea, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I just added some links. I hope it's ok now. Regarding another subject, I also created a new page, it is now a draft and I don't know who I can talk to to publish it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zhou_Yusen
- Maybe you can point me in some direction? Thank you LucasFR.pr (talk) 02:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Zhong Yusen, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Patents and non-RSes like The Daily Mail and The NYPost are not reliable and should not be used. Content based on them may contain original research as a result, and should be discouraged. Please stick to reliable sources. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 01:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)