Jump to content

User talk:Utopes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →‎Palworld: adding wikilink
m →‎Palworld: update
Line 574: Line 574:
== Palworld ==
== Palworld ==


I disagree with you about its class. B it is not. I would place this more at a C status. Its written like an advertisement and has grammatical issues. I would suggest you reference other B class articles and compare it to this for reference. Its really close, but I dot think its there yet per [[WP:Content assessment#Grades]]. <b><span style= "font-family: Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#00C000"> [[User:Dillard421|Dillard]][[Special:Contributions/Dillard421|421♂♂]] <sup>([[User talk:Dillard421|talk to me]])</sup></span></b> 23:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I disagree with you about its class. B it is not. I would place this more at a C status. Its written like an advertisement and has grammatical issues. Its really close, but I dot think its there yet per [[WP:Content assessment#Grades]]. Im going to run it though WPCleaner and fix it a bit, I already have some. Its in interesting topic. <b><span style= "font-family: Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#00C000"> [[User:Dillard421|Dillard]][[Special:Contributions/Dillard421|421♂♂]] <sup>([[User talk:Dillard421|talk to me]])</sup></span></b> 23:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:54, 27 January 2024


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

A barnstar for you!

The Civility Barnstar
Thank you for being so kind to me when you didn't agree with an AfC article I had accepted :) Genuinely probably the nicest ways I've been called out on anything on Wikipedia. -- NotCharizard 🗨 07:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Now my 10,000th edit actually has some significance and isn't some random gnomish vandalism warning xD Utopes (talk / cont) 08:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nickel azide

Could you please double-check that new article? The formula (CuN3) and nickel ionic nature (dinickel monocation) are not correct. DMacks (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: Thanks for letting me know! That was definitely an error; I had borrowed a page skeleton when I was putting the page together (mainly for tuning the chembox template), but did not catch that that part. I have gone back and updated the lead based on the associated zhwiki page, so please take a look to see if I addressed everything! (As a heads-up, I had planned on creating a few more of these for azides with quality coverage, namely for Cr, Mn, Co, and Hg as the ones that are left. These should crop up over the next couple days if everything goes right.) Utopes (talk / cont) 20:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ni(N3)2 looks good now. Thanks for all your work on these. I've worked with a few of the more-stable or gas-phase/matrix-isolated among the M(N3)x but not in many years. DMacks (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Utopes:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2700 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award

This award is given to Utopes for collecting more than 150 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given to Utopes for collecting more than 500 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Most redirects award

Redirect Ninja Award
Hi Utopes!

Thank you so much for contributing to the New pages patrol backlog drive. You reviewed an astounding 4,684 redirects. That’s more than any other person could do, and it’s safe to say you impressed us all with your dedication to the project. Your reviews were not just plentiful, but they were accurate, efficient, and well reasoned. This drive would not have been near as successful without your reviews and helpful advice provided via Discord. I am honored to award you the redirect ninja award for your outstanding job this month. Congratulations and happy editing! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 13:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


WikiCup 2023 November newsletter

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, Delaware BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

  • Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
  • England Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
  • Delaware BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
  • Berkelland LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
  • Ukraine Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review new article David Le Vita

Hello Utopes May I ask whether you could give me some more specific resons for the refusal? Thanks in advance and all best Schedukiam Schedukiam (talk) 14:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siege Of Inegol

Hello, you declined my article based on the fact that the sources didn't change despite the previous reviewer's comments. However as stated by the reviewer there was no problem with the source itself, it was just the way I added them in the article, which I fixed. I see no reason as to why there would be a problem now Salman Cooper Mapping (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me

I need help to complete my article Ultra8T (talk) 14:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message (test)

(This is a test message. You are getting this, because you are either a coordinator or an electoral commissioner for the Arbitration Committee Elections.)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation

Hi Utopes. :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For excellent work at WP:AFIN.

Equalwidth (C) 05:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfD and the WP:SNOW clause

I'm not going to revert your revert, but I do think keeping the discussion open longer will be a needless waste of editor time that could be better spent elsewhere. Cremastra (talk) 22:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While you're probably right that the discussion will result in a keep verdict, the decision to close it before the discussion even turned 12 hours old was premature. It was a nom created in good faith, but who was not given the time of day to withdraw if they wanted, or respond to any of the keep voters if they so choose. RfD is not a head count, and 40% of the keeps were "weak keeps" at that. At the end of the day, how editors spend their time is up them, but if the nominator has any words they'd like to add there, that is permitted. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra: If you want to close that discussion, I see the one above has also been closed as a snow-keep so the one in question could probably end up in the same boat. I will say, I was quite surprised to see what seemed to be a new person relisting and closing discussions on their first day at RfD, hence my apprehension around that discussion closing early despite the 5 keep votes. It'll probably have a snowball's chance of getting deleted, so it was likely correct in spirit. I trust your judgement, so if you think its closure-as-keep is the right call, that works for me too. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 75 reviews, for a total of 74 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!


– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you helping to coordinate the WP:ACE2023 election! — xaosflux Talk 01:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. Thank you for your first edit here, on Wikipedia for the year 2024. Γιάννης Ευαγγελίου (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on making the first edit of 2024! Big up, legend. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 00:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were lurking in the shadows waiting for the right moment to strike, weren't you? That paid off! Congrats! (and for those curious, this was the final edit of 2023) —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Utopes!

Happy New Year!

Utopes,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review

Hey Utopes,
Lots of love from Nepal
Thank you for reviewing Province Hospital Janakpur. I hope your reviews and contributions in Wikipedia will play a great role. Cheers and Happy editing. WikiEditorNepali (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Awards for 2023

The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award

For over 360 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Ninja Award
For all your hard work in 2023! Thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Poybo Media

Hi Utopes, I finished making this draft longer to the best of my ability. hopefully other editors can expand it more but i'll try to do it later if i remember. i'd appreciate if you could check if it's ready, thx Deondernemers (talk) 07:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that; I'll resubmit the draft under your name, but I'll leave it to another reviewer to see if someone else can ascertain the plot more than I can. As I mentioned earlier, the references look reliable, but another set of eyes could be warranted now that there's more to chew on. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun The Sheep 2 talk: Farmageddon

Greetings Utopes,

Is this an error? Or I am missing something? Maliner (talk) 06:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woah! I am... not sure how that happened, definitely an error. Thanks for catching it! Going to look at other similar edits to see if anything else looks like that, as I haven't seen anything like that before. Very perplexed because that type of message can/would only be placed on a talk page. Again, thank you! Utopes (talk / cont) 06:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Utopes this this and this
Saw it before, this error seems to be occurring since last year where it bugs when a talk page has a : in the middle. Justiyaya 06:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. We all know you're a great editor. Isn't it Justiyaya? Maliner (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate the heads up all, I'll be mindful when dealing with those requests, and/or CSD any errors such as the above if they slip through the cracks. Cheers! Utopes (talk / cont) 06:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
mhm! emptying the redirects backlog is really nice :D Justiyaya 06:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Justiyaya: You are great, too. I appreciate your efforts in reducing our backlog through your participation in the recent NPP backlog drive. Maliner (talk) 06:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also here to find out why you are creating odd talk pages. I see on the Move log that they are frequently then moved to the correct location. But I see that other editors have brought this issue to you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! is an example of what I'm concerned about. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that it's a potential bug / unexpected occurrence in the AFC/R helper script. When creating pages requested at AFC/R, the helper script places a banner on the respective talk page of each redirect created. Most of the time this is done without any problems. However, for a small subset of redirects (all of which contain a colon), there seems to be an issue where this talk page is created in the wrong namespace (article space). Justiyaya linked a discussion where this error was first brought up from last year. I didn't notice there was a problem at first but luckily I believe all of these situations have been taken care of, and I've scanned ahead and there's only one page left in the backlog that contains a colon, yet to be created. Could be good to test on if wanted; hopefully this clears up the situation! Utopes (talk / cont) 07:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC/RC

Archiving empty requests doesn't make sense, but if you want to do so, no problem. Happy editing! – DreamRimmer (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first request had entries that didn't get registered in the right format (but there was no rationale so they probably wouldn't pass). The second case had some text, but the main reason for logging was in case the two IPs wanted to revise their nomination in the future, so at least there's record of it 👍. Probably not the most necessary to keep record of, but during the process of archiving I figured I'd make sure to grab 100% of the non-vandalism requests made rather than cutting the malformatted ones. That way, everything is preserved from the good to the bad, in the very rare chance it'll be looked at again later. No worries, thanks for everything you do, and happy editing! Utopes (talk / cont) 19:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the categories

Thank you for recently creating the series of stock market categories, and in doing so, clearing the backlog. Much appreciated. You've helped make progress in something that has been held up by various roadblocks since early November last year. 92.71.60.61 (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFD

Hello, Utopes,

Thanks for taking some of the bad redirects you found to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 21#Chen Mingyi (Taiwan）. It was a snow close to Delete all which I was expecting. But I have seen some redirects with minor grammatical mistakes like this kept for technical reasons which I don't really understand and can't explain. It has to do with how some computers read and interpret text.

I'm just trying to discourage patrollers from using CSD G6 as a "catch-all" criteria that doesn't really stand for anything but articles, redirects or templates that are just wrong. Speedy deletion criteria are intentionally very specific and limited to apply to very obvious cases so pages like this that are clearly incorrect but don't fit a criteria are best going to AFD or RFD where editors who are experienced in reviewing certain types of pages can evaluate them. Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liz, thank you for the alert! I wasn't intending to use G6 as a means to hypothetically "just delete" a page, or in an "absence of rationale". There certainly are certainly a number of these that I've been able to identify, and you may have seen an uptick of such case following the closure of a handful of recent RfDs that you've pulled up, which indicated to me that it might have been a more wide scale issue. Particularly, there is this query which shows the list such cases, as they existed before deletion: [1] (and this is the query which includes pages that are still up, and don't meet the CSD criteria (or I haven't checked them): [2])
This said, I don't think I've been using G6 as a "catch-all" criteria. I completely understand how using it like one would be a problem, because it is important to make sure that CSD criteria are correctly categorized, and deleting something because "it's vaguely not right" is not a good reason for deletion, as this interpretation differs from person to person and not concrete. In the template text for Template:Db-error, it states: "This may meet [the CSD criteria]... as a redirect left over from moving a page that was obviously created at the wrong title". Based on the edit summaries used in every page-move, these pages were very shortly moved to the correct title, after previously being created at the wrong title.
Throughout this process, I feel as if I've been conscientious of which of these pages with unlikely characters I've been nominating. I've been paying attention to edit summaries and move logs to make sure that each page was an early page move from a title created in error, with no other editing history that may have arisen since then. As an example, there's a reason why I tagged Tomomatsu Atsunobu（Scholar) for G6, but have done nothing about the nearly identical Atsunobu Tomomatsu（Scholar） due to the page history of the latter. During the time that I was going through these titles, I also was creating relevant RfD threads such as this and that, as these pages were brand new creations at these titles and not redirects left behind from page moves, thus these did not meet the G6-error criteria.
I don't believe I've made a mistake on this front, but if there are any examples that weren't early page moves from articles created at the wrong title, I would be gracious to know, as this wasn't my intention. 🙏 I appreciate the reminder, as it's always good to make sure the right rationale is used for deletion tags, but you'd also be correct that I didn't want to flood RfD with that many more of these if G6-error was applicable. 😅 I've been trying my best to ensure that the correct channels are used for titles with these characters, but please let me know if there's anything I should be doing differently in the future with these. Thanks again! Utopes (talk / cont) 04:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palworld

I disagree with you about its class. B it is not. I would place this more at a C status. Its written like an advertisement and has grammatical issues. Its really close, but I dot think its there yet per WP:Content assessment#Grades. Im going to run it though WPCleaner and fix it a bit, I already have some. Its in interesting topic. Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 23:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes&oldid=1199784568"