User talk:Aanonymiss: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:36, 2 March 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Komorijuno, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Komorijuno, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation Liz! I'll check it out. Komorijuno (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Please read WP:WHYCITE. I've reverted a few (and plan to do more) of the citations you're adding as they serve no purpose. – ².O.^Boxing 12:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with adding Time Magazine to Vitalik Buterin's WIkipedia page? I think that's a reliable resource. Komorijuno (talk) 12:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't see anything wrong with editing or just typing fast. I feel discriminated against because of my country and nationality. Komorijuno (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lol I'm bowing out of this one. Cheerio. – ².O.^Boxing 12:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Careful with accusations like that. I, (and I'm sure this applies to SC-Boxing as well) have no idea what country you're from or nationality you are (how would I?), nor do I care. My comments are based soley on your actions. If you can't support your accusations, you need to strike and retract them, as unsupported accusations may be considered personal attacks. - wolf 13:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Came here for the same reason. We don't just tack on random and generic refs becuase they relate to the article subject (especially in the article lead). Just as 2-O-boxing stated above, I've reverted some of your refs, but you've added almost forty of these, just in the past couple hours alone. (And I haven't looked at any contribs from yesterday on). I think you should self-revert these additions, then read all the policies and guidelines that apply to sourcing, and only then add refs when and where they are appropriate and required. - wolf 12:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through and rolled back today's additions but haven't checked any from before. Komorijuno, it would be greatly appreciated if you could revert any recent edits of this sort. WP:WHYCITE will give you a thorough explanation, although it will generally echo what was said above. – ².O.^Boxing 12:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but I was adding usa.gov to the websites that requested for more information and sources to already very well reputable government agencies. Isn't usa.gov a reliable resource? There's a description of the website and it's a government website. Yeah I type fast, I'm a penetration tester I do things maybe 120 wpm. Komorijuno (talk) 12:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree, I apologize for any inconvenience I have caused but I put a ton of effort hat past one hour. It's not easy to find reliable website resources that meet the criteria. I will not revert any of these sources that I have added to the Wikipedia pages in the past one hour. The sources I added were in need and specially requested by Wikipedia itself. Just because I type very fast does not mean I am a bot, neither am I adding irrelevant or useless resources to websites. The webpages I've added as a resource are fundamental and best of best when comparing quality of resource. Komorijuno (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I was just adding usa.gov to already established government agencies that were requesting for more information. I don't see anything wrong with that. It's to establish that the organization is indeed from a government agency. How else or what other source would we verify this information from? Larps are annoying. Komorijuno (talk) 12:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and review all my other resources and citations. I'm having connectivity issues with Wikipedia right now, have a nice night. -June Komori Komorijuno (talk) 12:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I was adding usa.gov to the websites that requested for more information" - can you clarify this comment? Who was requesting what, and by what means?

"It's to establish that the organization is indeed from a government agency. How else or what other source would we verify this information from?" - That is already done via the sourced info in the article. It's the info that is sourced, not the article title. Also, see Primary vs. secondary vs. tertiary sourcing, among other guidelines.

"Larps are annoying." - huh? - wolf 13:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to United States Intelligence Community, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - wolf 18:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wolf, how are you? I hope all is well. Thank you for the warm welcoming. I have received the following information off the official government website and State government sources as well. I will review the material and reference links you've sent me. Thank you. Komorijuno (talk) 08:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Vault 7 has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please make accurate edit summaries. On Vault 7 your edit summary said "Added source to list" but your edit didnt do that Softlemonades (talk) 12:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Badr Organization, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Its not "fixing sentence grammar" if you create the problem by deleting the . separating two sentences, and then make a new one that doesnt make sense Softlemonades (talk) 21:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Removed any content for advertising, marketing, and self-promoting purposes"

hello@Komorijuno and welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that, in instances where you have removed content under the above justification, your edits have been reverted by other editors, including myself. Wikipedia has strict standards regarding promotion, but you did not point out the way in which the content was promotional. Editors are expected not to put their own point of view into an article by labeling content promotional and then removing it (or doing it by other means, for what that's worth). You have a welcome-message at the top of this talk page, which links to a number of important Wikipedia policies and rules. I hope you are reading through this material in order to understand how Wikipedia works, so as to avoid seeing your edits reverted.-- Quisqualis (talk) 02:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Selective prosecution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Age. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eco Yosemite Park

Hello, @HeraTheGoddess, The page you created Eco Yosemite Park seems to contain original (un cited) research. The caps case was also incorrect. I was tempted to move it to draftspace but wanted to give you a chance to improve it. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability

If these changes and updates cannot be made, your article will likely be moved to drafspace or tagged for deletion. Comintell (talk) 01:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Comintell, how are you doing? I hope you enjoyed your Thanksgiving weekend, thank you for the message. I am interested in documenting the oil tankers. I will fix the cap case and add more reliable sources. HeraTheGoddess (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cap case has been fixed. Please do add more sources. I have added comments and citation needed requests to the page as well. Remember, while you may have indepth knowledge, "Original research" (meaning no citations or references to support claims/facts) is not allowed.

Thanks for your edits, and I hope your journey goes well! Comintell (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been merged, so please edit: Eco Yosemite Park

Also, any references or citations should be added promptly because other Wikipedians may quickly draft or tag the page. Comintell (talk) 02:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Castor Maritime

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Castor Maritime, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HeraTheGoddess. Thank you for your work on Castor Maritime. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]