Jump to content

User talk:FMSky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 38: Line 38:
::I understand, and that's why I didn't template you or say I was going to report you. I won't. But 3RR is a bright line rule, especially on a page that has been contentious. Even a bunch of unrelated reverts around the page could very easily get an editor in trouble. I don't think I am telling you anything you don't know, but for me, reminders are helpful. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 19:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
::I understand, and that's why I didn't template you or say I was going to report you. I won't. But 3RR is a bright line rule, especially on a page that has been contentious. Even a bunch of unrelated reverts around the page could very easily get an editor in trouble. I don't think I am telling you anything you don't know, but for me, reminders are helpful. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 19:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Sure and trust me I initally didnt want to get this invested into the article. Its just tough when every good-faith change (even minor ones) is immediately reverted, so I'm just trying to find some common ground--[[User:FMSky|FMSky]] ([[User talk:FMSky#top|talk]]) 19:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Sure and trust me I initally didnt want to get this invested into the article. Its just tough when every good-faith change (even minor ones) is immediately reverted, so I'm just trying to find some common ground--[[User:FMSky|FMSky]] ([[User talk:FMSky#top|talk]]) 19:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:FMSky reported by User:Sideswipe9th (Result: )]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Sideswipe9th|Sideswipe9th]] ([[User talk:Sideswipe9th|talk]]) 20:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:14, 18 March 2024

Orphaned non-free image File:Leslie Harvey (guitarist).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leslie Harvey (guitarist).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sign?

I think you forgot to sign here. Joyous! Noise! 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFCs

I highly recommend that you start similar RFCs for Cate Blanchett, Meryl Streep, and the likes. That could be like a good movement toward a fair approach to all articles. ShahidTalk2me 10:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a good idea, it should be removed from those articles as well --FMSky (talk) 11:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I meant it for real, didn't mean to question your fairness. Still, I don't completely agree with you. Wikipedia should be neutral but factual positive commentary isn't necessarily bad as long as it is a good summary of the article. Who could ever doubt the fact that Streep is regarded as one of the most talented actresses today. ShahidTalk2me 11:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you didn't comment anything here, if you have some time to look through the discussion - see if you'd like to add something, and please provide your input!

P.S. But please stay calm and civil :)

Have a nice one --Moon darker (talk) 05:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch WP:3RR at the Sweet Baby page

Just a word to the wise--I know all too well how easy it can be to lose track of one's edits within a 24-hour period. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get it. But I'm making unrelated edits to this page. They are not "warring", these are completely seperate issues in different areas of the article that i'm adressing in hopes of making the article more neutral --FMSky (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, and that's why I didn't template you or say I was going to report you. I won't. But 3RR is a bright line rule, especially on a page that has been contentious. Even a bunch of unrelated reverts around the page could very easily get an editor in trouble. I don't think I am telling you anything you don't know, but for me, reminders are helpful. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure and trust me I initally didnt want to get this invested into the article. Its just tough when every good-faith change (even minor ones) is immediately reverted, so I'm just trying to find some common ground--FMSky (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:FMSky reported by User:Sideswipe9th (Result: ). Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]