Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBGN: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
AusLondonder (talk | contribs) →KBGN: Reply |
Neutralhomer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::I really wish we could have an AfD in this topic area without aspersions being cast on editors. Some of your edit summaries in response to my notifications have [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Milonica&diff=1215226022&oldid=1215192496&title=User_talk%3AMilonica&diffonly=1 just been abusive]. Unfortunately none of the sources you added, such as a listing at the Idaho State Broadcasters Association, seem to demonstrate notability per [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 05:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
:::I really wish we could have an AfD in this topic area without aspersions being cast on editors. Some of your edit summaries in response to my notifications have [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Milonica&diff=1215226022&oldid=1215192496&title=User_talk%3AMilonica&diffonly=1 just been abusive]. Unfortunately none of the sources you added, such as a listing at the Idaho State Broadcasters Association, seem to demonstrate notability per [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 05:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio|Radio]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Idaho|Idaho]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 19:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio|Radio]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|United States of America]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Idaho|Idaho]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 19:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
::::I believe you are mistaken on what a source is and how it connects to notability. The Idaho State Broadcasters Association is a secondary source, as is Broadcasting Yearbook (a periodical of it's time) and Scott Fybush's website, who is known and trusted within the industry for his news coverage (and he is a radio journalist by trade), is highly reliable. These are all reliable sources and demonstrate notability. |
|||
::::Oh and let's forego the hand-wringing and pearl-clutching, along with calling people "abusive", when someone disagrees with you. It's getting old and verging into NPA territory. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #FF7518;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:#900;">Neutralhomer</span>]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|<span style="color:Black;">Talk</span>]] • 19:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 19:05, 28 March 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- KBGN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacking secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Current sources are the FCC, radio-locator.com, and Broadcasting Yearbook. These do not demonstrate "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (Sources should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability) AusLondonder (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I'm not sure why there is suddenly a crusade to delete radio station articles. Sources have been added. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 23:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- I really wish we could have an AfD in this topic area without aspersions being cast on editors. Some of your edit summaries in response to my notifications have just been abusive. Unfortunately none of the sources you added, such as a listing at the Idaho State Broadcasters Association, seem to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG. AusLondonder (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I'm not sure why there is suddenly a crusade to delete radio station articles. Sources have been added. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 23:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Companies, United States of America, and Idaho. AusLondonder (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- I believe you are mistaken on what a source is and how it connects to notability. The Idaho State Broadcasters Association is a secondary source, as is Broadcasting Yearbook (a periodical of it's time) and Scott Fybush's website, who is known and trusted within the industry for his news coverage (and he is a radio journalist by trade), is highly reliable. These are all reliable sources and demonstrate notability.
- Oh and let's forego the hand-wringing and pearl-clutching, along with calling people "abusive", when someone disagrees with you. It's getting old and verging into NPA territory. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)