Talk:Joan Adler: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Malerooster (talk | contribs) |
Malerooster (talk | contribs) →Nationality in the lead sentence: new section |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I removed this since this since it most well written biographies it is not placed there. This information is in the info box and can go in the main body. If we want to go against MOS, that's fine just get consensus, thank you. [[User:Malerooster|Malerooster]] ([[User talk:Malerooster|talk]]) 11:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) |
I removed this since this since it most well written biographies it is not placed there. This information is in the info box and can go in the main body. If we want to go against MOS, that's fine just get consensus, thank you. [[User:Malerooster|Malerooster]] ([[User talk:Malerooster|talk]]) 11:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Nationality in the lead sentence == |
|||
I she that the subject has dual nationality. This should still be included in the lead sentence. Does somebody want to take a stab at that? I usually stick to single nationalities. Thank you, [[User:Malerooster|Malerooster]] ([[User talk:Malerooster|talk]]) 11:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:56, 30 April 2024
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
Your/a CV is not a reference? It wouldnt work in her Phd thesis and it wont work here. Can you find 3rd party reliable refs that show her notability? Victuallers (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- CVs are acceptable as sources for factual information, but not for opinion. Notability is something separate; the relevant criterion is WP:PROF, which Adler passes triply, as a highly-cited researcher (#C1 of WP:PROF; see Google scholar), as the president of a major academic society (#C6), and as a fellow (a highly selective and honorific grade of membership; #C3) in another major academic society. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Place of birth in DOB place holder
I removed this since this since it most well written biographies it is not placed there. This information is in the info box and can go in the main body. If we want to go against MOS, that's fine just get consensus, thank you. Malerooster (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Nationality in the lead sentence
I she that the subject has dual nationality. This should still be included in the lead sentence. Does somebody want to take a stab at that? I usually stick to single nationalities. Thank you, Malerooster (talk) 11:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 9 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Start-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- Start-Class Women scientists articles
- Low-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles