Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudi Britz: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Rugbyfan22 (talk | contribs) →Rudi Britz: delete |
→Rudi Britz: Reply |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople|Sportspeople]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Rugby union|Rugby union]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/South Africa|South Africa]]. [[User:JTtheOG|JTtheOG]] ([[User talk:JTtheOG|talk]]) 19:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople|Sportspeople]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Rugby union|Rugby union]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/South Africa|South Africa]]. [[User:JTtheOG|JTtheOG]] ([[User talk:JTtheOG|talk]]) 19:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' Looks to fail [[WP:GNG]]. No suitable redirect per [[WP:ATD]]. [[User:Rugbyfan22|Rugbyfan22]] ([[User talk:Rugbyfan22|talk]]) 18:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Looks to fail [[WP:GNG]]. No suitable redirect per [[WP:ATD]]. [[User:Rugbyfan22|Rugbyfan22]] ([[User talk:Rugbyfan22|talk]]) 18:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:'''Delete.''' The page definitely fails to meet any sort of independent coverage standards, and it is extremely unlikely that the page (1) currently offers or has the potential to offer encyclopedic quality on a notable subject, (2) holds any sort of public notoriety apart from mere occupational trivial mentions, and/or (3) exists in such a manner that readers would find sufficient coverage to go by, of which there is absolutely none. There simply aren't any other sources, and I certainly can't see a reason this article could theoretically make the grade under any circumstances whatsoever. [[User:TheMysteriousShadeheart|TheMysteriousShadeheart]] ([[User talk:TheMysteriousShadeheart|talk]]) 17:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:42, 13 May 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rudi Britz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found were trivial mentions. JTtheOG (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. The page definitely fails to meet any sort of independent coverage standards, and it is extremely unlikely that the page (1) currently offers or has the potential to offer encyclopedic quality on a notable subject, (2) holds any sort of public notoriety apart from mere occupational trivial mentions, and/or (3) exists in such a manner that readers would find sufficient coverage to go by, of which there is absolutely none. There simply aren't any other sources, and I certainly can't see a reason this article could theoretically make the grade under any circumstances whatsoever. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)