Jump to content

Talk:Names of large numbers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Names of large numbers/Archive 2) (bot
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Names of large numbers/Archive 2) (bot
Line 13: Line 13:
{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=mid}}
}}
}}

== Maximusquintillion ==

It's 10<sup>1,000,000,000,000,000,000</sup> or 10<sup>10<sup>18 <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2.132.8.107|2.132.8.107]] ([[User talk:2.132.8.107#top|talk]]) 14:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Maximunssextillion ==
== Maximunssextillion ==

Revision as of 13:36, 24 May 2024

Maximunssextillion

Say the number of maximunssextillion Luccasantana (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a real number. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 22:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the name of the 1089 digit emirp?

There is a reversed prime number (emirp) defined by Jens Kruse Andersen from Denmark (http://primerecords.dk) that has 1089 digits. I don't seem to find a name for it in Wikipedia. 115.64.52.116 (talk) 07:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HM and UM

The table for googol and googolplex has UM as an authority, but it hasn't been mentioned before and has no link. I believe it's supposed to represent the HM reference, but it doesn't say that. 130.226.139.26 (talk) 07:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 12:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Base -illion orders of magnitude

Does this make 1,000 the zeroth base -illion, and 1 the negative first base -illion? 2601:1C0:847C:50C0:A54D:85AC:91BC:7681 (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In a sense yes, since a n-illion is 103n+3. However, this observation is original research and we are right to leave it out of the article. Certes (talk) 15:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1,000,000,000,000,000,000

Quintillion has 18 zeros 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as stated in the article. It can also have 30 zeros in long scale. Does something need to be amended? Certes (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10^100 (Ten Duotrigintillion)

Ten Duotrigintillion Is Also call Googol 10^100 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as stated in the article. Certes (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One Hundred Quinsexagintillion is also call gargoogol (10^200

Gargoogol has 200 Zeros 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This number is documented on several wikis such as Fandom, but as user-contributed content it may not be a sufficiently reliable source to support inclusion in the article. Certes (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Billion is also call diosge

Disoge has 10 zeros 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does any reliable source use this term? Certes (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Googolcrime has 1,000 zeros It's 10× Bigger than Googol

1,000 zeros Is so many 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One YouTuber seems to think that "googolcrime" is a number, but they don't appear to be a reliable source. (Also, that ratio is 10900 rather than 10.) Certes (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]