Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requesting protection for Leo Frank
Line 50: Line 50:
* {{pagelinks|Leo Frank}}
* {{pagelinks|Leo Frank}}
'''Reason:''' Contenious topic, related to the [[Anti-Defamation League]] [[User:Blackmamba31248|Blackmamba31248]] ([[User talk:Blackmamba31248|talk]]) 17:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
'''Reason:''' Contenious topic, related to the [[Anti-Defamation League]] [[User:Blackmamba31248|Blackmamba31248]] ([[User talk:Blackmamba31248|talk]]) 17:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
=== [[:India at the 2024 Summer Olympics]] ===
* {{pagelinks|1=India at the 2024 Summer Olympics}}

'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – persistent disruptive editing by adding incorrect stats and info mostly by ip users. A temporary protection is needed. [[User:Drat8sub|Drat8sub]] ([[User talk:Drat8sub|talk]]) 18:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:04, 31 May 2024

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level 2 ... the first warning they got in five days. Daniel Case (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Requesting protection per the WP:GS/AA topics restriction, broadly construed, as the article mentions Armenian genocide specifically [1], [2]. Also there is potential socking based on some recent edits, see confirmed sock and recent user edit for example of restoring the unreliable sourced 5.5 figure in infobox [3], [4]. Vanezi (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If you think there's socking going on, report it at SPI. Daniel Case (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case please see the sockpuppet investigation, there has been extensive socking in the article too. And just now, a random IP who's likely a sockpuppet themselves [5] (edit summary justification similar to the blocked sock [6]), reverted in the WP:GS/AA restricted article. Could you please protect the page? Vanezi (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. mwwv converseedits 13:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP for the last week or so. Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar protection expired a few days ago. Leijurv (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not entirely clear this is, in fact, vandalism. Statements are added that XYZ is "currently" the MLA and then removed. Without any context, this may simply be an editor (clumsily) applying MOS:RELTIME. The "current" MLA is listed and then removed, however, that MLA was only just elected two weeks ago and it's not clear the LA has officially opened yet, ergo, he might not actually be appropriate for the infobox as he hasn't been formally invested into office (?), I don't know. These are all things that would need to be discussed at the Talk page. But there's no discussion. There's possibly some 3RR occurring, but that needs to be reported at the noticeboard and doesn't, by itself, justify protection. Maybe I'm missing something, in which case let me know. Chetsford (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Despite being reverted repeatedly, a non-logged in user keeps making the same edit that violates WP:SPS for the last few months EliotWL (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Continuous spamming and disruption of edits after the end of temporary protection, similar also happened to 2022 Indian Premier League. Protection of this page in any sort is really needed as spammers are doing this especially for spreading hate towards the league. Wowlastic10 (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive pov-pushing by IP's, newbie, blocked editor on several pages related to Pancala. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contenious topic, related to the Anti-Defamation League Blackmamba31248 (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing by adding incorrect stats and info mostly by ip users. A temporary protection is needed. Drat8sub (talk) 18:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]