Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UHO MZF F.C.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
→‎UHO MZF F.C.: Closed as no consensus (XFDcloser)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:UHO MZF F.C.]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|G}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 09:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
===[[:UHO MZF F.C.]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=UHO MZF F.C.}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UHO MZF F.C.|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 7#{{anchorencode:UHO MZF F.C.}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1226488855/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=UHO MZF F.C.}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UHO MZF F.C.|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 7#{{anchorencode:UHO MZF F.C.}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1226488855/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 16: Line 21:
::That's not true. These are not match reports, but rather articles about how the team won the championship, failed in the round of 16, et cetera, and football club notability is not based on whether they're important regionally, internationally, et cetera. They are also covered on an ongoing basis by the newspaper in their local area including sources not currently linked in the article, such as [https://nawalamedia.id/babak-32-besar-liga-3-uho-mzf-kendari-satu-group-dengan-juara-piala-indonesia-2012/]: this is about the competition but the club is clearly the subject of the article. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 23:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
::That's not true. These are not match reports, but rather articles about how the team won the championship, failed in the round of 16, et cetera, and football club notability is not based on whether they're important regionally, internationally, et cetera. They are also covered on an ongoing basis by the newspaper in their local area including sources not currently linked in the article, such as [https://nawalamedia.id/babak-32-besar-liga-3-uho-mzf-kendari-satu-group-dengan-juara-piala-indonesia-2012/]: this is about the competition but the club is clearly the subject of the article. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 23:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
::: That is a routine coverage. According to [[WP:SPORTCRIT]]; {{tq|Local sources must be [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] of the subject, and '''must provide reports beyond [[WP:ROUTINE|routine game coverage]]'''}}. None of reference in the article provide reports beyond routine coverage, such as information about the team itself. [[User:Ckfasdf|Ckfasdf]] ([[User talk:Ckfasdf|talk]]) 02:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
::: That is a routine coverage. According to [[WP:SPORTCRIT]]; {{tq|Local sources must be [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] of the subject, and '''must provide reports beyond [[WP:ROUTINE|routine game coverage]]'''}}. None of reference in the article provide reports beyond routine coverage, such as information about the team itself. [[User:Ckfasdf|Ckfasdf]] ([[User talk:Ckfasdf|talk]]) 02:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small>[[User:CycloneYoris|<b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b>]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:CycloneYoris|<b style="color:purple">''talk!''</b>]]</sup> 07:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|UHO MZF F.C.]]</noinclude></p>
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small>[[User:CycloneYoris|<b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b>]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:CycloneYoris|<b style="color:purple">''talk!''</b>]]</sup> 07:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 09:26, 14 June 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Stifle (talk) 09:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UHO MZF F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Coverage and sourcing is just They exist" and champions of two cups of some type. North8000 (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • That sounds like saying that it can't meet the actual GNG (and so IMO is not wp:notable) and so we need a different GNG to make sure that non-notable lower division football teams get in. North8000 (talk) 21:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not happy at the way you've completely mis-represented my keep !vote. The article easily passes GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 23:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SportingFlyer: I posted in a way that highlighted what I felt to be issues with your argument. In hindsight, viewing it from another angle, such is a "spun negative" description of your post. I did not intend to do something like that. Please accept my apologies for that. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not true. These are not match reports, but rather articles about how the team won the championship, failed in the round of 16, et cetera, and football club notability is not based on whether they're important regionally, internationally, et cetera. They are also covered on an ongoing basis by the newspaper in their local area including sources not currently linked in the article, such as [1]: this is about the competition but the club is clearly the subject of the article. SportingFlyer T·C 23:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a routine coverage. According to WP:SPORTCRIT; Local sources must be independent of the subject, and must provide reports beyond routine game coverage. None of reference in the article provide reports beyond routine coverage, such as information about the team itself. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.