Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltersgate Cottage railway station: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:28, 17 June 2024

Saltersgate Cottage railway station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Of the two sources, one does not mention the station at all. The other is a personal website (likely fails WP:RS) with a total of five sentences about the station. A BEFORE search does not find anything more substantial. My bold redirect to Stanhope and Tyne Railway was removed by the article's creator. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge pertinent information and photograph into Stanhope and Tyne Railway would be a good idea. The station itself is not notable enough for a standalone article, but the railway itself is, so that page would be a good home for this info. TH1980 (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And what would go between High Stouk and the next article station? A redirect breaking the preceding or following station? It existed at one point and is documented to have. DragonofBatley (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP: Consistency and per WP: Notable. As it's got coverage in quite a few books and articles. DragonofBatley (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you're making up a non-existent "consistency" policy, this article cites no books, and the citations present do not give significant coverage of the station. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Stanhope and Tyne Railway per nomination. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Stations|Stations]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|England]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 00:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Merge''' pertinent information and photograph into [[Stanhope and Tyne Railway]] would be a good idea. The station itself is not notable enough for a standalone article, but the railway itself is, so that page would be a good home for this info. [[User:TH1980|TH1980]] ([[User talk:TH1980|talk]]) 03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
+*:And what would go between High Stouk and the next article station? A redirect breaking the preceding or following station? It existed at one point and is documented to have. [[User:DragonofBatley|DragonofBatley]] ([[User talk:DragonofBatley|talk]]) 08:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per [[WP: Consistency]] and per [[WP: Notable]]. As it's got coverage in quite a few books and articles. [[User:DragonofBatley|DragonofBatley]] ([[User talk:DragonofBatley|talk]]) 17:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 ::Once again, you're making up a non-existent "consistency" policy, this article cites no books, and the citations present do not give significant coverage of the station. [[User:Trainsandotherthings|Trainsandotherthings]] ([[User talk:Trainsandotherthings|talk]]) 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)