Jump to content

Talk:Supreme Court Historical Society: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
upgrading 'class' from 'start' to 'C'
Line 7: Line 7:


Please, provide information as to what this lot is up to; inquiring minds want to know. [[Special:Contributions/172.75.173.194|172.75.173.194]] ([[User talk:172.75.173.194|talk]]) 03:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Please, provide information as to what this lot is up to; inquiring minds want to know. [[Special:Contributions/172.75.173.194|172.75.173.194]] ([[User talk:172.75.173.194|talk]]) 03:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

== See-alsos unrelated to Supreme Court Historical Society ==

The Controversies section has {{tl|see also}} links to [[Presidency of Donald Trump#Ethics]] and [[Clinton Foundation#Controversies]]. I don't see any documented connections. The edit summary which added these is {{tq|linking to two other similar ethics controversies}}. Which seems odd to me. Absent any connection to the linked see-also articles, why not link to a thousand other influence controversies?

I'm inclined to remove these, as well as the complementary set of see-also links added to the Clinton Foundation article.

But even though I am quibbling about these links, a shout-out to {{ping|Superb Owl|p=,}} who did so much good work on this article. -- [[User:M.boli|M.boli]] ([[User talk:M.boli|talk]]) 15:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:33, 21 June 2024

very skimpy

Please, provide information as to what this lot is up to; inquiring minds want to know. 172.75.173.194 (talk) 03:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See-alsos unrelated to Supreme Court Historical Society

The Controversies section has {{see also}} links to Presidency of Donald Trump#Ethics and Clinton Foundation#Controversies. I don't see any documented connections. The edit summary which added these is linking to two other similar ethics controversies. Which seems odd to me. Absent any connection to the linked see-also articles, why not link to a thousand other influence controversies?

I'm inclined to remove these, as well as the complementary set of see-also links added to the Clinton Foundation article.

But even though I am quibbling about these links, a shout-out to @Superb Owl, who did so much good work on this article. -- M.boli (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]