Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 June 29: Difference between revisions
→Template:Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox: Adding deletion nomination of Template:Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox. |
→Template:Chicago Bruisers starting quarterback navbox: Adding deletion nomination of Template:Chicago Bruisers starting quarterback navbox. |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
==== [[Template:Chicago Bruisers starting quarterback navbox]] ==== |
|||
* {{Tfd links|Chicago Bruisers starting quarterback navbox}} |
|||
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general [[Chicago Bruisers]] article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. <span style="font-family:Verdana">[[User:Eagles247|<b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b>]] [[User talk:Eagles247|<b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b>]]</span> [[Special:Contribs/Eagles247|<span style="color:#004C54; font-size:x-small">(C)</span>]] 14:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox]] ==== |
||
* {{Tfd links|Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox}} |
* {{Tfd links|Colorado Crush starting quarterback navbox}} |
||
Revision as of 14:33, 29 June 2024
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Chicago Bruisers article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Colorado Crush article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Oklahoma City Yard Dawgz article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Davidson Wildcats football article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Western Carolina Catamounts football article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Mississippi College Choctaws football article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Centre Colonels football article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (not including the heading, which links to the general Williams Ephs football article), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete – Per discussion at Template talk:K Line (Los Angeles Metro)#Detailed diagrams, consensus was reached regarding the redundancy of this template due to its cumbersome size, difficulty in reading, especially on mobile view, and excessive amount of unimportant detail for such a short urban rail line, especially in comparison to the templates for most international mainline heavy railway lines which lack such a template. There were previously other detailed diagrams that were eventually split off from the main templates to their own subpages per discussion at Template talk:A Line (Los Angeles Metro)#Rivers due to concerns about the already growing sizes of the main templates. However, because of the reasons stated above, none of them were ever used in any external capacity and were subsequently deleted. This template was restored to its respective main template in spite of established consensus, and it'd be far more trouble restoring all the other templates as well. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)