Jump to content

Talk:Antimonumento 5J/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
support
→‎Misc: Reply
Line 52: Line 52:


*Comment: Thanks for reviewing, Arconning. For the record, I support the promotion of this article, assuming all of your concerns are addressed appropriately. Thanks! ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 14:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
*Comment: Thanks for reviewing, Arconning. For the record, I support the promotion of this article, assuming all of your concerns are addressed appropriately. Thanks! ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 14:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
*:Added, and thanks. [[WP:CC-BY-SA|(CC)]]&nbsp;[[User:Tbhotch|<span style="color:#4B0082;">Tb</span><span style="color:#6082B6;">hotch</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tbhotch|<span style="color:#555555;">™</span>]]</sup> 02:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


{{GAProgress|picsrelevant=pass|neutral=pass|focus=pass|reliablesources=pass|originalresearch=pass|mos=fail|prose=fail|broadness=pass|freeortaggedpics=pass|reflayout=pass|stable=pass|copyvio=pass}}
{{GAProgress|picsrelevant=pass|neutral=pass|focus=pass|reliablesources=pass|originalresearch=pass|mos=fail|prose=fail|broadness=pass|freeortaggedpics=pass|reflayout=pass|stable=pass|copyvio=pass}}

Revision as of 02:34, 5 July 2024

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 21:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch Here are my comments. :) Arconning (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

  • protests of 4, 5, The artwork was installed on 5 June 2023, authorities removed the sculpture, add a comma at the end.
  • monument be reinstalled,, add to after monument.
  • Optional. Citation in the lead is alright but if you could mention it in the body and remove the citation in the lead, that would be alright.
  • Removed. It was for the DYK.

Background

  •  Giovanni died of head trauma from a blunt object, , remove comma.
  • Mex$, US$, link to the denominations.
  • Somebody once told me that money would fall into WP:OVERLINK
  • According to the family, they refused the payment,, After Floyd's murder,, remove comma.
  • The video became viral,, change became to went, and remove the comma.
  • who were reported as forcibly disappeared., replace as to to have.
  • "El Halconazo" , add a comma at the end.

History and installation

  • on the opposite side of the State Government Palace, add a comma at the end.
  • another anti-monument, add was at the end.
  • Giovanni's case was not isolated and, add that at the end.
  • the lights in the plaza were turned off, add a comma at the end.

Replica and ordered reinstallation

  • for installation was submitted , add a comma at the end.
  • consult with the state civil protection, remove the.
  • Firefighters rejected the reinstallation, add a comma at the end.
  • and that (being made of steel) it could cause electric problems,, remove comma.
  • is one meter shorter, convert to imperial system as well.

Images

  • All have proper licenses, just be careful on the second to last one.

Refs

  • Random reference check: 1, 8, 15, 19, 27, good!
  • Earwig and manual check seems great.

Misc

  • No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information about the background of the topic and the topic itself, neutral.
@Tbhotch You should mention in the body that the monument was built due to his death and the protests relating to his death. I believe that's my last comment, and we'll be set! Arconning (talk) 04:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed