Template talk:Did you know/Approved: Difference between revisions
m moving 1 tentatively approved nominations from WP:DYKN, removing 0 closed nominations, WugBot v0.9.2 |
→Special occasion holding area: move up non-Olympic request |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===July 17=== |
===July 17=== |
||
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Pure Japanese}} |
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Pure Japanese}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
===Summer Olympics, July 26 through August 11=== |
===Summer Olympics, July 26 through August 11=== |
||
Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
===July 25 === |
===July 25 === |
||
*{{Did you know nominations/Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics}} |
*{{Did you know nominations/Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
===July 27 === |
===July 27 === |
Revision as of 12:44, 5 July 2024
This page holds approved nominations that are waiting to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into a Prep area, and from there, prep sets are promoted to a queue, and then to the main page.
To create a new nomination or to see those that are yet to be approved, see Template talk:Did you know. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Click on the link to go directly to the Special occasion holding area.
- (if it looks like updates to subsidiary templates aren't being reflected).
![]() | If some of the nominations are not showing up properly at the bottom of the page, these alternative pages can be used to view a subset of the most recent nominations.
|
Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
May 27 | 1 | |
May 30 | 2 | |
June 2 | 1 | |
June 3 | 2 | 1 |
June 7 | 1 | |
June 8 | 1 | |
June 9 | 2 | 1 |
June 10 | 1 | |
June 11 | 1 | |
June 13 | 1 | |
June 14 | 2 | 1 |
June 15 | 2 | |
June 17 | 2 | |
June 19 | 2 | 1 |
June 20 | 1 | |
June 21 | 3 | |
June 22 | 2 | |
June 23 | 4 | 2 |
June 24 | 3 | 1 |
June 25 | 2 | 1 |
June 26 | 8 | 3 |
June 27 | 2 | 1 |
June 28 | 6 | 3 |
June 29 | 4 | 3 |
June 30 | 6 | 5 |
July 1 | 8 | 5 |
July 2 | 5 | 5 |
July 3 | 9 | 6 |
July 4 | 9 | 5 |
July 5 | 8 | 4 |
July 6 | 13 | 10 |
July 7 | 11 | 5 |
July 8 | 10 | 6 |
July 9 | 8 | 4 |
July 10 | 10 | 6 |
July 11 | 9 | 3 |
July 12 | 8 | 4 |
July 13 | 14 | 5 |
July 14 | 12 | 6 |
July 15 | 8 | 3 |
July 16 | 12 | 8 |
July 17 | 9 | 4 |
July 18 | 5 | |
July 19 | 10 | |
July 20 | 2 | |
July 21 | 7 | |
July 22 | 5 | |
July 23 | ||
Total | 254 | 112 |
Last updated 02:28, 23 July 2024 UTC Current time is 03:35, 23 July 2024 UTC [refresh] |
Instructions for nominators
This page is for those nominations that have already been approved and are waiting to be promoted. If yours has been approved but has not yet been run on the main page, it should either be on this page or will soon be moved here, or already promoted to a Prep area or Queue ahead of an appearance on the main page.
If you wish to create a new nomination, please go to the Template talk:Did you know page; there are instructions there in a section similar to this one on how to nominate an article for DYK.
Frequently asked questions
Backlogged?
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until someone promotes it to a preparation area. To alleviate this problem, if the approved page has more than 120 approved hooks, then sets will change twice per day (every 12 hours) instead of once per day (every 24 hours). When the backlog falls below 60 approved nominations set frequency returns to once a day.
Where is my hook?
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to the nominations page, and it also isn't on this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is either in one of the prep areas, has been promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
Instructions for other editors
How to promote an accepted hook
- See Wikipedia:Did you know/Preparation areas for full instructions.
- In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote.
- In another window, open the prep set you intend to add the hook to.
- In the prep set...
- Paste the hook into the hook area (be sure to not paste in that that)
- Paste the credit information ({{DYKmake}} and/or {{DYKnom}}) into the credits area.
- Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted [[Jane Fonda]]", preview, and save
- Back on DYK nomination page...
- change
{{DYKsubpage
to{{subst:DYKsubpage
- change
|passed=
to|passed=yes
- Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted original hook to Prep 3", preview, and save
- change
How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue
- Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
- Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
- View the edit history for that page
- Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
- Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
- Add a transclusion of the template back to the nominations page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from the nominations page.
- If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.
Nominations
Special occasion holding area
Non-Olympics requests
July 17
July 26
Summer Olympics, July 26 through August 11
Please see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Olympic hooks table for potential timing changes.
July 19 (pre-Olympics hook)
July 23 (pre-Olympics hook)
July 24 (pre-Olympics hook)
Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics
- ... that for the opening ceremony of the 1924 Summer Olympics, the Philippines held two flags as they were still a colony of the United States?
- ALT1:
... that the Philippines sent athletes at the 1924 Summer Olympics because of an athlete that didn't compete at the Games?Source: [5] - ALT2: ... that at the 1924 Summer Olympics, the Philippines was the first Southeast Asian nation to compete at the Olympics? Source: [6]
- ALT1a: ... that the Philippines was said to have sent athletes to the 1924 Summer Olympics because of an athlete who did not compete at the Games?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Gladys Cromwell
Arconning (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I prefer ALT 1 TheNuggeteer (talk) 04:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
TheNuggeteer, I've struck ALT1 as there are various problems with it. Both the source and the article say that the "Philippines were said to have sent athletes", hence we cannot say in Wikivoice that the "Philippines sent athletes". Secondly, you don't send athletes "at" the Olympics; you send them "to" the Olympics. Thirdly, when referring to people, you must use "who" and not "that". Fourthly, we do not use contractions in hooks apart from direct quotes. ALT1a fixes all those issues. Schwede66 01:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- How about alt 2?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
01:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- How about alt 2?
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Olympic_rings_without_rims.svg/50px-Olympic_rings_without_rims.svg.png)
July 25
Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics
- ... that a law was signed so that the delegation of the Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics could return home?
- ALT1: ... that the Solomon Islands used the 2020 Summer Olympics as a learning opportunity for their hosting of the 2023 Pacific Games? Source: https://www.oceanianoc.org/press/rara-using-tokyo-olympics-to-inform-sol-2023-pacific-games
- ALT2: ... that Naoyuki Fujiyama's role as the chef de mission of the Solomon Islands at the 2020 Summer Olympics was controversial as he was not a citizen of the Solomon Islands? Source: https://www.oceanianoc.org/press/tokyo-2020-organising-committee-hosts-chefs-de-mission-seminar-in-tokyo-this-week https://www.solomonstarnews.com/fujiyama-told-to-step-down/
- Reviewed: [[]]
Arconning (talk) 13:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC).
Qualifies through 5x expansion. Good sourcing on both the first hook and the article in general. No evidence of copyvio, article generally in good shape. Still needs a QPQ. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Oops! I've seen you around so much I sort of assumed you needed a QPQ; this is good to go. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
July 27
July 31
Dylan Travis
- ... that in nine years, basketball player Dylan Travis played for nine head coaches?
- Source: USA Basketball ("In nine years of playing basketball beyond the high school level, he played for nine different coaches.")
BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC).
Hi BeanieFan11, review follows: article moved to mainspace on 11 June and exceeds minimum length; article is generally well written (I couldn't parse "was named first-team All-State, All-Metro and to the Lincoln Journal Star's Super-State Team" but might just be my ignorance of basketball?); sources cited look to be reliable enough, though I am not familiar with them; I didn't pick up any issues with overly close paraphrasing from a spot check; hook fact is interesting enough for me, mentioned in the article and checks out to the source cited. My first review for a good few months but looks fine to me except that a QPQ is awaited - Dumelow (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: Following up on the QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: QPQ done; sorry for the delay. (Also, in the sentence you mention, those things mentioned are different all-star teams.) BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: QPQ done; sorry for the delay. (Also, in the sentence you mention, those things mentioned are different all-star teams.) BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: Following up on the QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Olympic_rings_without_rims.svg/50px-Olympic_rings_without_rims.svg.png)
August 4
2022 European Athletics Championships – Women's 400 metres, 2022 European Athletics Championships – Women's 400 metres hurdles
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/2022-08-19_European_Championships_2022_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_400_Metres_Hurdles_by_Sandro_Halank%E2%80%93016.jpg/220px-2022-08-19_European_Championships_2022_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_400_Metres_Hurdles_by_Sandro_Halank%E2%80%93016.jpg)
- ... that Femke Bol won the women's 400 metres and 400 metres hurdles (final pictured) in an unprecedented double victory at the 2022 European Athletics Championships?
- Source: Dutch source "Missie geslaagd. Femke Bol heeft vrijdagavond in München voor een unieke dubbelslag op een groot titeltoernooi in de atletiekwereld gezorgd. Het 22-jarige supertalent liep naar de Europese titel op de 400 meter horden. Twee dagen eerder was ze al Europees kampioene op de 400 meter zonder hindernissen geworden. Geen enkele vrouw deed dat eerder." English source alternative
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/María Pacheco, Template:Did you know nominations/Alyssa Mendoza
Editør (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px:
- Personally I feel at 100px the current image is too wide to be useful for this nomination. I would suggest changing it for either the Brossier/Bol photo from the 400m semi or the Lehikoinen/Bol photo from the 400m hurdles final, but I will also leave this up to the promoter if they feel differently.
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Both articles' prose meets 5x expansion. Readable prose on both also surpasses the target. Generally well sourced and well written, hook is also cited and interesting. Images are free, however some issues regarding the selected image (see above). 2 QPQs done to match the double bold articles. Besides potentially swapping the image out for another I'm happy to pass the DYK for these articles. Great job! Sims2aholic8 (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I would prefer the Lehikoinen/Bol photo as alternative. – Editør (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Or a cropped version of the originally proposed photo if that is an option (cropped to a square, centered on Bol). – Editør (talk) 10:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've added a crop of the above. Not a square; this looks better (I looked at a square crop first). Schwede66 02:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'd prefer your crop. I think the hook and image caption should be changed to:
- I've added a crop of the above. Not a square; this looks better (I looked at a square crop first). Schwede66 02:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Or a cropped version of the originally proposed photo if that is an option (cropped to a square, centered on Bol). – Editør (talk) 10:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Femke Bol (pictured) won the women's 400 metres and 400 metres hurdles in an unprecedented double victory at the 2022 European Athletics Championships?
- – Editør (talk) 08:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Olympic_rings_without_rims.svg/50px-Olympic_rings_without_rims.svg.png)
August 9
Manizha Talash
- ... that Manizha Talash is "Afghanistan's first female breakdancer"?
- Source: Reuters
- ALT1: ... that Olympic breakdancer Manizha Talash said that when she saw a video "of a man just spinning over his head ... I immediately told myself: 'That's what I want to do with my life!'"? Source: same
- ALT2: ... that Olympic breakdancer Manizha Talash has continued performing despite receiving death threats? Source: same
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/"We want the ball and we're going to score!"
BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC).
- Not a review, but can I suggest that, if this gets approved, that we run this hook on 9 August? See Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Olympic hooks table for background. Could we also have a hook that mentions the Olympics, please? Schwede66 04:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: Please complete the QPQ. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. QPQ has since been supplied. All hook facts check out and are interesting in various ways, especially ALT0/ALT1. Dunno if we need quotes on the quote from the headline. No textual or other issues. Fine for the 9 August Olympic suggestion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Approved nominations
Articles created/expanded on May 12
Articles created/expanded on May 14
Articles created/expanded on May 22
Articles created/expanded on June 5
Articles created/expanded on June 9
Articles created/expanded on June 10
Articles created/expanded on June 12
Articles created/expanded on June 13
18th Lok Sabha
... that post enforcement of Women's Reservation Bill in India in the next few years, 33% of women MPs will be required although new Lok Sabha has only 14%?
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC). General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Approved only for ALT hook proposed by me. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
@Dharmadhyaksha and Mehedi Abedin: The article has a citation needed tag and needs copyediting for sentences such as "Parents of Choudhary and Sarojs have been MPs/MLAs and of Jatav have been deputy sarpanch", "The 14% strength of women in Lok Sabha is considerably short", etc. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 07:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: The tag wasn’t' there when I was inspecting the article as a reviewer. Also the article was good to me in that time and it was edited many times by many users and ip after review. Mehedi Abedin 11:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- CN tag is sorted by some editor. @AirshipJungleman29: What do you want those two sentences to be written as? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think this needs to be rephrased. '33% of MPs will be required to be women although new Lok Sabha has only 14%?' It's 33 percent of MPs are mandated to be women, not 33 percent of women MPs; there is a fundamental difference. Will Thorpe (talk) 02:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Willthorpe:! ALT1 & 2 have suggested now. @AirshipJungleman29:, your response is also awaited. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries Dharmadhyaksha, glad to help! Will Thorpe (talk) 03:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- This hook feels really wordy, which is why I think it hasn't been promoted yet. Is there any way to trim it a bit? What about this? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALT3 ... that although the Indian Constitution has required 33% of MPs to be women since 2023, the Lok Sabha formed in 2024 has only 14%?
- @Premeditated Chaos: Well, ALT3 will be factually incorrect as the Reservation Bill is not really implemented yet. It was passed in 2023 and the date of implementation is yet to be decided as there will be delimitation of constituencies after the next Census is completed. Both these major steps (census & then delimitation) are still pending. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- So wait, basically the hook is that the percentage of female MPs is less than what's mandated by a law that isn't even in force yet? I'm not sure I find that particularly surprising or intriguing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes.... its way less that what would be required by maybe next elections. I understand the hook is becoming un-interesting as we are being factually correct. Hence i was using "will be required" and skipping the part of "when will it be required". If you have any other suggestions, we can think of those too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:46, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- So wait, basically the hook is that the percentage of female MPs is less than what's mandated by a law that isn't even in force yet? I'm not sure I find that particularly surprising or intriguing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos: Well, ALT3 will be factually incorrect as the Reservation Bill is not really implemented yet. It was passed in 2023 and the date of implementation is yet to be decided as there will be delimitation of constituencies after the next Census is completed. Both these major steps (census & then delimitation) are still pending. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALT3 ... that although the Indian Constitution has required 33% of MPs to be women since 2023, the Lok Sabha formed in 2024 has only 14%?
- This hook feels really wordy, which is why I think it hasn't been promoted yet. Is there any way to trim it a bit? What about this? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries Dharmadhyaksha, glad to help! Will Thorpe (talk) 03:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Willthorpe:! ALT1 & 2 have suggested now. @AirshipJungleman29:, your response is also awaited. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
@Dharmadhyaksha and Premeditated Chaos: how's an ALT4: ... that India will need to more than double its current number of women in Parliament under a new law? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fine by me. In fact, much better than what i had framed. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 14
Articles created/expanded on June 15
Timeline of Partygate
- ... that after he attended a birthday party on 19 June 2020 (pictured), Boris Johnson became the first serving Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to be found to have broken the law?
- Source: "Mr Johnson is the first serving PM to be sanctioned for breaking the law." BBC News
- ALT1: ... that the UK government's "Partygate" scandal, involving lockdown-breaking gatherings at Downing Street, led to the issuance of 126 fixed penalty notices to 83 individuals?
- ALT2: ... that the Sue Gray report into the Partygate scandal criticised the senior leadership at Downing Street and the Cabinet Office for "failures of leadership and judgment" during the COVID-19 lockdown?
- ALT3: ... that during the Partygate scandal, Downing Street staff were revealed to have held "Wine Time Fridays" every Friday afternoon during the COVID-19 pandemic?
- ALT4: ... that a £142 wine fridge was smuggled into Downing Street on 11 December 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom?
- ALT5: ... that the initial Partygate story was broken by Pippa Crerar of the Daily Mirror and Paul Brand of ITV News, who later won multiple journalism awards for their reporting?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Zhang Zhenglang
- Comment: The best time to run this would probably be 19 June, but I recognise that I may have missed the boat on that date.
A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC).
- Comment not review As this is an article featuring election candidates, it should not appear on the main page until after 4 July, see WP:DYKELECT. TSventon (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. QPQ present. This is a unique contribution to DYK as it is three paragraphs and a list; even though one paragraph does not end in an inline citation, I am treating it as a lead-section paragraph. All the list bullet points contain at least one inline citation. The hook fact checks out and is included. Image is OGL-licensed and acceptable for the Main Page. Good to go after 4 July per above. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the review, Sammi! If you've got concerns over the amount of prose in this article, I've expanded the lead with another paragraph. Let me know if you think this has improved things. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 15:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Despite what the sources say, I find it hard to believe that in the hundreds of years there have been prime ministers in the UK, not a single one of them before Boris Johnson has ever broken some law. In fact, it only took me a couple of minutes to find in Robert Walpole: In 1712, Walpole was accused of venality and corruption in the matter of two forage contracts for Scotland. Although it was proven that he had retained none of the money, Walpole was pronounced "guilty of a high breach of trust and notorious corruption".[16] He was impeached by the House of Commons and found guilty by the House of Lords; he was then imprisoned in the Tower of London for six months and expelled from Parliament.
- @RoySmith: I believe the distinction is that Johnson is the first serving Prime Minister to be found to have broken the law – the Walpole incident that you're describing occurred nine years before he became Prime Minister. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 22:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
@A Thousand Doors and Sammi Brie: I have unpromoted this, becaue I now feel the hook violates WP:DYKHOOKBLP. I recognise that this is a currently-fraught subject, and other promoters might see differently, but I don't intend on promoting this hook. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Same. I am not taking a chance. SL93 (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm ambivalent. I think that any hook is DUE as long as it is not unduly negative compared to the article. But I'm not sure if there are BLP problems with this article existing in the first place. If there aren't, I'd be okay with promoting it. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- If the community feels that the current hook is too contentious, then I've added in some alts that I hope might be preferred instead. I still feel that the original is the most interesting and "hook"-y, but I'm happy to go with consensus on this. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 10:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Same. I am not taking a chance. SL93 (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 16
Articles created/expanded on June 17
Articles created/expanded on June 18
Articles created/expanded on June 19
Articles created/expanded on June 20
Articles created/expanded on June 21
Union for Democracy and Social Progress (Democratic Republic of the Congo)
- ... that after the Union for Democracy and Social Progress won the 2018 Congolese general election, its presidential candidate was criticized as unproven, inexperienced and lacking his father's charisma?
- Source: Burke, Jason (11 January 2019). "Why Kabila may be real victor of DRC's contested election". The Guardian.
Tshisekedi is the leader of the Union for Democracy and Social Progress (UDPS), DRC's oldest and largest opposition party. Critics say he is unproven, inexperienced and lacks the charisma of his father. 'His father was a man of the country. The son is very limited,' Valentin Mubake, former secretary-general of Tshisekedi's party told the Guardian last month.
Yue🌙 22:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Vanderwaalforces: Thank you for taking the time to do this review! I will note that I did have to do a QPQ, which I did. You can double check and, if you see no issues, please modify your review to reflect this. Cheers. Yue🌙 21:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Yue: Don't mind me, I actually saw your QPQ, thank you for notifying me. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Does this meet WP:DYKBLP? It's purely negative about a living person. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
It does not. New hook needed Yue. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: How about this hook? Yue🌙 20:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the electoral victory of the Union for Democracy and Social Progress in 2018 led to the DR Congo's first peaceful transition of power since its independence from Belgium in 1960?
- Source: Mwanamilongo, Saleh; Anna, Cara (24 January 2019). "Congo's surprise new leader in 1st peaceful power transfer". AP News.
Opposition leader Felix Tshisekedi was sworn in as Congo's president Thursday, marking the country's first peaceful transfer of power since independence from Belgium nearly 60 years ago, and immediately announced plans for the release of all political prisoners.
- Does this meet WP:DYKBLP? It's purely negative about a living person. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 22
Articles created/expanded on June 23
Wong Sau Ying
![Wong Sau Ying wearing her hair in a bob cut](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/da/Wong_Sang.png/119px-Wong_Sang.png)
- ... that after Wong Sau Ying (pictured) attempted to assassinate a British colonial official, the police and press began to associate the bob cut with anarchism?
- Source: Harper, Tim (2021). Underground Asia: Global Revolutionaries and the Assault on Empire. Harvard University Press. pp. 509–510. ISBN 978-0-674-72461-7.
Grnrchst (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC).
Interesting and clears Earwig, length, QPQ, and formatting, but can you provide a quotation directly in the reference to verify the claim? Orchastrattor (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orchastrattor: It's tricky, because this hook is summing up two full pages of information. It's not something I can easily quote. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Grnrchst: the bit about the bob cut would be the only thing that needs verification, is the claim paraphrased directly from the author or does the source simply give some individual examples? Orchastrattor (talk) 15:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Orchastrattor: Here's a couple excerpts from the text. It goes further into this in preceding and subsequent paragraphs:
--Grnrchst (talk) 09:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)The colonial public was chilled by her [Wong Sau Ying's] exacting premeditation. The ‘bobbed-hair woman’ had arrived in Kuala Lumpur only that morning. Some reports said that she came from Canton; others that she was from Penang, and fluent in Malay. They were, above all, obsessed by the way she looked. [...]
The year 1925 was when the ‘Modern Girl’ became a global phenomenon, and in this the women of Asia took the lead. [...] There were stories of ‘bobbed-hair riots’ as far away as Mexico City, of rival ‘anti-bobbed-hair leagues’ and ‘bobbed-hair defence leagues’. [...]
The ‘Modern Girl’ was increasingly linked to a dangerous, disordered modernity; to nihilism and to anarchism. As one expatriate journal put it: ‘The now notorious “bobbed-haired” lady might just as well have turned up in Venezuela or Tibet for all the relation that her “mission” had to events in Malaya... Politics virtually do not exist in this country.’ The Straits Times brayed for a system of ‘identity tickets’ to indicate who was a loyal subject of His Majesty King George V and who was not. There were suddenly other sightings of ‘strange’ young women in Kuala Lumpur. [...]
At the root of the case was her ‘new style’.
@Grnrchst: passes V and neutrality then, approved! Orchastrattor (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Orchastrattor: Here's a couple excerpts from the text. It goes further into this in preceding and subsequent paragraphs:
Cobra Crack
- ... that when Didier Berthod failed to make the first free ascent of Cobra Crack (pictured) in 2005, he quit climbing and became a Franciscan monk, but returned in 2024 to make the 20th ascent?
- Source: Climbing Mazine, PlanetMountain
Aszx5000 (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC).
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Berthod's becoming a Franciscan monk is not mentioned in the article Aszx5000. Personally, I would be inclinde to remove the last nine words of the hook per WP:DYKTRIM. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29:, I have added his vocation to the article now; no problem trimming but I think the fact that he returned to ascend it is a great part of the story (and hook)? Aszx5000 (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: Have your concerns been resolved? Z1720 (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Aszx5000 A few things need to be rephrased per Earwig. Even little parts like "the first free ascent" and "one of the hardest crack climbs in the world" can, and should, be rephrased. Those are just two examples. SL93 (talk) 01:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 24
Articles created/expanded on June 25
Ashin Munindabhivamsa
- ... that Myanmar’s junta Min Aung Hlaing publicly apologized religious leaders for the firearm death of Shindan Sayadaw, a prominent scholar monk who was shot by the Tatmadaw soldiers in June 2024? Source: VOA Burmese, The Irrawaddy
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hypochrysops piceatus
- Comment: The subject was also nominated for ITN as RD.
Htanaungg (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
The article appeared in the news before, and the hook does not seem interesting because these types of killings are common. Considering the reply of the nominator. I feel life ALT2 is more interesting. TheNuggeteer (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @TheNuggeteer: Thank you for the review. Per WP:DYKNEW, I’ve mentioned in the comment that the subject is listed only in RD section of the ITN, not bold link.
- Although this type of killing may be common elsewhere, it is a rare case in the highly religious country that a prominent religious figure was shot dead by the ruling junta’s soldiers. Plus, it is very few that the junta apologized publicly; he would never show his weakness in public.
- I’d like to nominate another ALTs:
- ALT1: ...that Myanmar’s junta Min Aung Hlaing publicly apologized for the firearm death of Shindan Sayadaw, a few days after his spokesman blamed the opposition armed groups for the case?
- ALT2: ...that the assassination of Shindan Sayadaw in June 2024 led to a confrontation between the Burmese military and the religious leaders?
- Regards, Htanaungg (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 26
Windy Zhan
... that Windy Zhan (pictured) is a member of the Hong Kong Cantopop girl group After Class who has been learning and practising vocal music since the age of five?
- Source: "詹天文成功考入美國伯克利音樂學院 繼姚焯菲後到海外升學". am730 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). 4 April 2024. Retrieved 26 June 2024.: "After Class...成員...詹天文(Windy)...,她在5歲時已隨女高音歌唱家王珊及戚芷君學習正統聲樂"
- "與顧嘉煇王力宏做校友 詹天文獲伯克利音樂學院取錄". Mingpao Weekly (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). 5 April 2024. Archived from the original on 21 April 2024. Retrieved 26 June 2024.: "5歲開始隨女高音歌唱家王珊及戚芷君學習聲樂"
- "聲夢小花|詹天文獲伯克利音樂學院取錄 Windy音樂造詣高5歲學聲樂【多圖】". Hong Kong Economic Times (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). 5 April 2024. Archived from the original on 18 April 2024. Retrieved 26 June 2024.: "Windy在5歲起跟隨專業女高音歌唱家王珊、戚芷君學習正統聲樂"
- "《聲夢》詹天文獲伯克利音樂學院取錄成顧嘉煇王力宏師妹 5歲跟名師學聲樂屢獲獎". Headline Daily (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). 5 April 2024. Retrieved 26 June 2024.: "TVB歌唱節目《聲夢傳奇》首季參賽者詹天文(Windy)雖然沒有得到三甲名次,但憑出色歌藝被選中加入女子組合After Class...,5歲已跟專業女高音歌唱家王珊及戚芷君學習正統聲樂"
- Reviewed:
Will629 (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC).
Hello, Will629. The nomination is timely and the article is long enough with no copyvios detected. Several entries in the Discography table, as well as the Awards and nominations table, appear unsourced, though. These would require references. I think it can use some tweaking for catchiness; how about this?--NØ 19:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Windy Zhan (pictured) of the Hong Kong girl group After Class has been learning and practising vocal music since the age of five?
- MaranoFan, thank you very much for your prompt review. I have corrected the issues and your question suggestion is very good, thank you! May I ask what do I need to do for using your ALT1 suggestion, as I am new for DYK in English Wikipedia. Thank you!--Will629 (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I have struck the first hook so ALT1 will be considered by the promotor, no further action required. Thank you for correcting the issues so quickly. Foreign-language reference accepted in good faith, this is good to go. Welcome to the English Wikipedia and best of luck here!--NØ 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much again!--Will629 (talk) 20:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Will629 and MaranoFan: is this unusual or interesting enough? Out of interest, I just looked at a number of other famous singers—all had started before the age of seven. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- +1 from me, I'd say. We get a lot of these types of hooks, ironically enough, and they usually don't perform too well. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Will629 and MaranoFan: is this unusual or interesting enough? Out of interest, I just looked at a number of other famous singers—all had started before the age of seven. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much again!--Will629 (talk) 20:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- MaranoFan, thank you very much for your prompt review. I have corrected the issues and your question suggestion is very good, thank you! May I ask what do I need to do for using your ALT1 suggestion, as I am new for DYK in English Wikipedia. Thank you!--Will629 (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Windy Zhan (pictured) of the Hong Kong girl group After Class has been learning and practising vocal music since the age of five?
Articles created/expanded on June 27
Teri Ore
- ... that the 2008 Hindi-language song "Teri Ore" was shot in six hours in Egypt with Katrina Kaif changing?
- Reviewed:
KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 09:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. RoySmith (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Long enough
- New enough
- Earwig is over-quota on searches, but no problems seen when run in links-only mode.
- I don't see any problems with NPOV, BLP, etc.
- The sources range from high-quality to meh (random entertainment industry websites) but nothing that sets off alarm bells.
- Nom is QPQ-exempt.
- The hook fact is in the article and cited. That being said, I don't know what "changing" means in this context
- I don't know anything about how music videos are shot, but having it done in 6 hours does seem interesting.
approved, with the one proviso that maybe the word "changing" needs to be clarified in the hook. RoySmith (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- "changing dress"? KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95 and RoySmith:
as of now, I'm not seeing that the sources in the article establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Do reliable, secondary sources that provide significant coverage of the topic exist? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: The song meets the notability. I don't understand what more work the article needs. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: I'm not sure it does. The first source is a track listing, the next three are listicles, the next one is an interview, the next three are album reviews, the next two are awards, and only the last one could arguably count as significant coverage of substantial impact. That means you only have one source that meets the requirements spelled out in WP:GNG – you'd need one or two more to meet notability requirements. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Waiting for your reply and about the notability tag. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 07:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: the most recent source you've provided does not give significant coverage to the topic, unfortunately. RoySmith, any thoughts? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 15:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm probably the wrong person to ask about this. As far as I'm concerned, the vast majority of our music articles don't meet WP:N, but I recognize I'm not going to convince people of that, so I just grit my teeth and move on. RoySmith (talk) 15:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do as you wish. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm probably the wrong person to ask about this. As far as I'm concerned, the vast majority of our music articles don't meet WP:N, but I recognize I'm not going to convince people of that, so I just grit my teeth and move on. RoySmith (talk) 15:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: the most recent source you've provided does not give significant coverage to the topic, unfortunately. RoySmith, any thoughts? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 15:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Waiting for your reply and about the notability tag. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 07:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95: I'm not sure it does. The first source is a track listing, the next three are listicles, the next one is an interview, the next three are album reviews, the next two are awards, and only the last one could arguably count as significant coverage of substantial impact. That means you only have one source that meets the requirements spelled out in WP:GNG – you'd need one or two more to meet notability requirements. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: The song meets the notability. I don't understand what more work the article needs. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @KunalAggarwal95 and RoySmith:
- "changing dress"? KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 28
Cannonball (LIRR train)
- ... that the Cannonball (pictured) is the only Long Island Rail Road train still known by its historic name?
- Source: [7]
The only named train operated by the L.I.R.R., the Cannonball first traveled these tracks in the 1890s as an express train between Long Island City and Southampton.
- ALT1: ... that the Cannonball (pictured), a commuter train on the Long Island Rail Road, once operated exclusively with parlor cars? Source: [8]
This summer it will have all-parlor car trains on the long runs to the twin tips of Long Island.
; [9]...from May to October, the railroad runs the Cannonball Express, which McNamara called the only all-parlor-car train in the country.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Project Ketch
- Comment: I would prefer the hook to run on a Friday, since the train runs on summer Fridays.
Complex/Rational 14:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: for ALT1 as I think folks will want to click on parlor car and it meets the criteria. For ALT0, the name bit didn't really make me want to read more into it. I'm also not convinced that the source for ALT0 fully backs up the claim, as it says it's the only one known by a name, not necessarily that it is still known by the same name. Seems a bit synthy. Grk1011 (talk) 13:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Grk1011: Thanks for the review. There are a couple of other sources throughout the article indicating other named trains no longer run, plus the 2024 timetable and press release that mention the name, but I'm cool sticking with ALT1. Complex/Rational 14:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
ABC Cinema, Brighton
- ... that the world premiere of Brighton Rock was held at Brighton's ABC Cinema (pictured)?
- Source: Allen Eyles (2003), Brighton and Hove Cinemas, p.71. "At midnight on Thursday 8 January 1948, the world premiere of Brighton Rock took place at the Savoy (no other cinema was in the running, as it was made by ABC's associated production company)." (First sentence from a full paragraph about the premiere. The Savoy was the name of the cinema at the time, as noted in the article.)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chicken of Tomorrow Contest
- Comment: Another Brighton article contributed as part of the recent restarting of Wikipedia:WikiProject Brighton.
Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC).
- Reveiewing... new enough, long enough, QPQ provided. Hook in article, image free. Will complete soon. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
...No copyvio issues, neutral. Hook is followed by a citation to a reference i cannot see, though a copy of the text is provided above. Reads well and hook and article are interesting. Thank you for your work. Whispyhistory (talk) 10:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on June 29
National Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime
- ... that Bangladeshi
government agencyNational Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime collected ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to৳18 billion orUS$150 million in 2023) fromcorruptionsuspects which the court deemed was illegal?
Mehedi Abedin 03:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC).
Interesting article. All parts of the article are cited with no problems with copyright. The stated hook is also mentioned in the article with proper sourcing. Good to go. Toadboy123 (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
Reverting promotion to prep; the hook is 223 prose characters including its "equivalent" parenthetical, way too far about the 200-character maximum. Vinegarymass911, please propose a shorter hook. The current hook's "from corruption suspects which the court deemed was illegal" has confusing antecedents; it's not the suspects that were illegal, but presumably how they acquired the funds. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: What about now? I can see the new hook has 189 characters.
- Still ungrammatical (even more with the removal of "government agency"). Also, striking out parts of the old hook is not proposing a new hook. Please write them out again, i.e.: ... that Bangladeshi National Coordination Committee Against Corruption and Crime collected ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to US$150 million in 2023) from suspects which the court deemed was illegal? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: What about now? I can see the new hook has 189 characters.
- ALT: ... that ৳6.5 billion (equivalent to US$150 million in 2023) was collected from corruption suspects by a Bangladeshi government agency which the court deemed was illegal in 2017?
Articles created/expanded on July 1
TESCREAL
- ... that Timnit Gebru and Émile P. Torres created the acronym TESCREAL to describe a group of ideologies popular among people focused on existential risk from artificial general intelligence?
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
The readable prose size is 1,119 words which is well short of the required 1,500 words. Notifying nominator.- @PearlyGigs: DYK requires articles be greater than 1,500 characters in length, which this article exceeds (7,845). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Characters? Oh, dear! My apologies, GorillaWarfare, and I'll continue. First one of these I've done. PearlyGigs (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @PearlyGigs: DYK requires articles be greater than 1,500 characters in length, which this article exceeds (7,845). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Was a draft until today so new enough and, as I now realise, also long enough. I can't see any problems in the article around copyvio, POV or OR. Sourcing looks good overall and the hook citations appear to be sound and reliable. The hook is certainly interesting because it caught my eye immediately when I was checking my own nomination. QPQ has been done. I think this is fine and it should be promoted. PearlyGigs (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose this nomination: An article on this subject was deleted 7 months ago because of weak sourcing. There haven't been any new sources added other than a paper by the two proponents of this theory and lots of other really weak sources. Wikipedia's job isn't to promote anti-vaxx conspiracy theories or other conspiracy theories, of which in my and other people's opinions, this is one. The only people claiming that ANYONE adheres to these multiple philosophies is Torres and Gebru. ---Avatar317(talk) 00:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Original admin who closed AfD undeleted it after i proposed appropriate changes. the AfD never came to consensus of conspiracy theory (just u), and deleted it due to lack of WP:N. if u want to delete this again, use AfD again or bug the original admin.Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed that that would be a conversation for AfD, not DYK. The article is neutral and adequately sourced. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- The LEAD is well written and neutral, thanks for that.---Avatar317(talk) 03:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was aware when I did the DYK review that the article is about ideologies, but I don't consider the article to be promoting those ideologies because it is neutral. The subject, in my opinion, is notable. I can't say I'm knowledgeable about TESCREAL but the article does appear to be adequately sourced. I've been reading it again and I still think the hook should be promoted. But, as I say, I am not an SME in this area so I will happily step aside if an SME is needed. Incidentally, the lead is the primary location of the hook material and its two sources. Thanks. PearlyGigs (talk) 09:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have to second the concerns brought up above: this article was merged in November for poor sourcing and the fact that it seemed to lean very heavily into the op-ed angle of the source it did use. To be clear, I certainly have a great personal distaste for the majority of people who run the majority of software companies, and ethical objections to a good portion of the United States' GDP (I am a diehard Linux user with all of the political implications that entails). However, the implication that "global tech elites" are engaged in a deliberate scheme to carry out eugenics (as one of the sources said from the previous version of this article), based on a collection of op-eds and blog posts where people who hate them say this a bunch of times, seems to raise some rather significant BLP issues. It is somewhat concerning to vaguely imply this in wikivoice as though it's settled fact, and then the citations are to a journal of biosemiotics. jp×g🗯️ 02:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Posting on here same stuff as in the Talk Page section:
- A) This article was merged for lack of WP:N. If you consider it still an issue, use WP:AfD or bug the original admin who deleted, merged, than undeleted this. It isn't a valid argument to suggest that it's settled that it deserves to remerged if we've added a ton of sourcing and improved on it. Settle it by starting the process to delete it if you want.
- B) Are there reliable sources indicating that TESCREAL is a significantly derogatory epithet similar to Libtard/Chud? Marc Andreessen self-describes as TESCREAList. Many of these folks regularly ascribe to multiple of these philosophies as transhumanists, ethical altruists, long-termists, etc. Sourcing here does not necessarily imply that every TESCREAList is also a eugenicist, nor do we use WP:SYNTH to suggest that these folks are all eugenicists. There is no mention of eugenicist claims in the third section. Also, we have Big Tech as a wikipedia article along with criticism, which is also a similar "perjorative" against tech companies, and other significant "perjoratives" with negative connotations such as Democrat in Name Only and Cuckservative. These all explain what opinion writers and commentators mean, and why. This article is far more tame than many of those.
- C) That more than a dozen opinions use a term like this should be notable enough. I suspect that any sort of article about philosophies will require opinionated sources or commentaries. Effective altruism includes sourcing from Centre for Effective Altruism and by extension the Effective Altruism Forum, study centers specifically invested in effective altruism and founded by leaders, as well as many opinions.
- D) WP:OPINION applies here, especially for philosphical arguments. I looked for criticisms of TESCREAL. If more are published, we can include them. These sources are WP:SECONDARY, they contain analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Secondary sources are not necessarily independent sources.
- E) If you want to settle WP:BLP, please post in the section on WP:BLPN. We've already started and done this argument. There are multiple sources on WP:PUBLICFIGUREs here alleging that many of these folks use TESCREAL to justify their tech projects, and we make sure to use the word "allege" correctly, as per WP:OPINION, along with the correct sourcing
- Conclusion:) TESCREAL is unliked by some portion of folks on here for some reason. I'm happy to listen to arguments, but I want an argument about why we are suddenly so sensitive about criticism of Elon Musk/etc. for using human extinction for every time someone criticizes his behavior or cars or products. If you are just an elon musk/nick bostrum/etc. fan, than say it and stop throwing mud on an article that contains a criticism of philosophies that occurs often enough that we can gather 20+ sources, including 10 using the term in severe detail to directly dissect the argument that yelling extinction every 15 minutes doesn't mean you've justified your next mega project. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 04:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Note: In the interests of not duplicating every comment, I'll just note that there is a parallel discussion happening at Talk:TESCREAL#Neutrality (to/from which some of these comments have been copied). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 12:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Lewis Worthington Smith
- ... that Lewis Worthington Smith received royalties from his textbook The Mechanism of English Style for 20 years?
- Source: "Smith, Lewis Worthington". ArchivesSpace at the University of Iowa. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
SL93 (talk) 00:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
Hook is interesting and appropriately sourced. Article is both long and new enough. No copyvio concerns. QPQ done. I'd wager that The Mechanism of English Style is either suitable as a redirect or an article. Great work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on July 2
Capital Bicycle Club
- ... that residents reported the first cyclist club in Washington, D.C., (uniform pictured) to the police, concerned that bicycles posed a danger to pedestrians?
- Source: Bloom, John (2015). "The Extraordinary History of Cycling and Bike Racing in Washington, DC". In Elzey, Chris; Wiggins, David K. (eds.). DC Sports: The Nation's Capital at Play. pages 3–5
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 19:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Looks good. Nice work. AGF on hook source. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Riley Gale
- ... that a critic compared vocalist Riley Gale (pictured) to a "rabid wolf"?
- ALT1: ... that after his death, heavy metal vocalist Riley Gale (pictured) was memorialized by Fox News host Greg Gutfeld? Source: https://www.nme.com/news/music/fox-news-host-greg-gutfeld-pays-tribute-to-riley-gale-of-power-trip-2739223
- Reviewed:
Kimikel (talk) 01:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
- Kimikel Article meets DYK standards – well-sourced, neutral, and free of plagiarism (the article is a defo must-read, pretty nice writing for a short article). The source comes from a reliable source which is... the bare minimum but yeah it works! The image supplied works as well, pretty nice quality. Original alt works.
Arconning (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on July 3
Scott Jarvis (actor)
- ... that actor Scott Jarvis was angered when White House officials under Richard Nixon requested that portions of his role in the musical 1776 be cut due to its anti-war theme?
- Source: "Courier for Washington". Anderson Herald Bulletin. February 23, 1970. p. 1.
4meter4 (talk) 17:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
This looks good! Long enough, eligible, no evidence of copyvio, QPQ done. Hook is cited in-article. I'll have to AGF on the source itself, but otherwise everything seems good. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Cocoa production in São Tomé and Príncipe
- ... that São Tomé and Príncipe were known as "the Chocolate Islands" in the early 1900s, when they were the world's top exporters of cocoa (samples pictured)?
- Source: Drew, Keith (6 July 2023). "How the Chocolate Islands are rediscovering their roots". BBC. Retrieved 28 June 2024.
The trees thrived in the rich volcanic soil, and by the early 1900s, São Tomé and Príncipe was the biggest exporter of cacao in the world, earning it the nickname of 'The Chocolate Islands'.
- ALT1: ... that São Tomé and Príncipe was known as "the Chocolate Islands" in the early 1900s, when it was the world's top exporter of cocoa (samples pictured)? Source: Same as above.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emmanuella Atora
- Comment: Technically, São Tomé and Príncipe is a singular country (a Portuguese colony at the time mentioned in the hook). The hook should therefore use singular conjugations of verbs, but it sounded too odd upon my initial reading. I thus changed the verbs to their plural conjugations, as if the islands themselves are being described rather than the modern country or the former colony. I have nonetheless included my original wording as ALT1, in case the reviewer or promoter wants to compare the two.
Yue🌙 07:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
Hi Yue, review follows: article created 3 July and exceeds minimum length; I reworded one sentence slightly to move it further from the source, but otherwise I don't think there is an issue with overly close paraphrasing; article is cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources for the subject; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited (BBC); a QPQ has been provided; image is properly licensed and looks fine. I changed from single to double quotation marks in the hooks to match the article and, I think, our MOS. In terms of plurals I think English_plurals#Geographical_plurals_used_as_singular discusses this; either alternative sounds OK to me but British English tends to be a bit more flexible than US English on this (see eg. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Plurals) - Dumelow (talk) 09:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: Thank you for taking the time to do this review! On second thought, maybe ALT1 is the better choice because ALT0 implies that there were two exporters instead of one. Yue🌙 02:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)