Draft talk:Defense of Kopanki

spaming

stop posting battles and write it in Polish-Ukrainian conflict 1939-1947 Birczenin (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

For what? Forward.ops (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

please stop creating a million articles and write in Polish-Ukrainian ethnic conflct instead Birczenin (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Why don’t you add the battle of Vilya in that article? Buddy leave me alone I want to do the articles and I will no matter what’s yo yapping about. Stop adding this “better source needed” while I’ve just add them and you should to read it instead of just writing an false information to my articles Forward.ops (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Once again doubting the credibility of the source no page 2 of the ref was given, and the first is a document that may have been over or under reported, I gave you good examples, using the example of Mykola Lebed. Also source doesn't have author. Birczenin (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

In all articles I’ve added the sources and great references. Just click on it and there will be a document of the UPA and read it all. Forward.ops (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

UPA documents overstated or understated is not a source , the article does not have a neutral POV because you should give historians and not chronicles or documents where the main people who created it may not be telling the truth etc. second your ref here is this one "УПА в світлі документів з боротьби за Українську Самостійну Соборну Державу 1942—1950 рр. Т. 2 (Бойові дії УПА) (in Ukrainian). 1960." there isn't a page Birczenin (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

“UPA documents overstated or understated is not a source” it is literally a source, and there’s an official document of the Ukrainian insurgents that showed the battle of the village of Kopanki. Forward.ops (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I have already proved to you that the documents of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army cannot be a source because they were written by one person who often concealed over or underestimated numbers. On the example of Viatrovych, there was an accusation about the reliability of UPA documents. Birczenin (talk) 12:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Sources and encyclopaedic

@Forward.ops For me this article should be deleted, despite its encyclopaedic character it still sounds awful when I read it, please throw out the unnecessary stuff and one more thing what you are doing comes under "own sources" which means that we do not use documents but as birczenin said historical books. AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

It’s not my own sources lil bro it’s an official statistics and informations that came from the documents of the UPA. So it’s shouldn’t be deleted. Bro if you’re mad cuz we won this battle then idc bro, stop mentioning me anymore it’s a great article that I’ve made and there’s no reasons for deleting it. You is Birczenin bro you’ve mentioned this name for like 4 times Forward.ops (talk) 12:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Yes I mentioned it because he was talking to you here, according to the rules of wikipedia it is so called "own research" we do not use documents only books checked and recognize. AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 12:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

You’re literally doing “own research” by removing the Poles from the article meanwhile they was there and that’s a confirmed information. You’re is Birczenin so and changed accounts cuz got banned again. Documents is used Forward.ops (talk) 12:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Banned? I don't know the person Birczenin and I didn't mention him anywhere but here because he was talking to you at the top, and you have a problem, write what is in the source don't make up your own commanders or after please admin intervention, if you won't stop AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 12:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Forward.ops (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)