Jump to content

User talk:Zefr: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Tag: Reverted
Line 14: Line 14:
== July 2024 ==
== July 2024 ==
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Almond]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 00:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Almond]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;[[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 00:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
:{{Reply to|Zefr}} In [[Special:Diff/1233046083|an edit summary]] you cited [[WP:BRD]], but you made a bold edit and it was reverted; per [[WP:ONUS]] you should be discussing it and getting a consensus ''before'' continuously reinserting it (specifically the content introduced in [[Special:Diff/1232233027|this edit]]). Citing 3RR and immediately continuing to edit war yourself with the same number of reverts in the same time period is disruptive, especially when the onus is on you to justify the addition, not [[Special:Diff/1233045855|the other way around]]. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 01:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{Reply to|Zefr}} In [[Special:Diff/1233046083|an edit summary]] you cited [[WP:BRD]], but you made a bold edit and it was reverted; per [[WP:ONUS]] you should be discussing it and getting a consensus ''before'' continuously reinserting any newly added changes. Citing 3RR and immediately continuing to edit war yourself with the same number of reverts in the same time period is disruptive, especially when the onus is on you to justify the addition, not [[Special:Diff/1233045855|the other way around]]. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 01:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::I did want to clarify however that you both have been introducing changes and reverting each other, unless it's being restored to a stable version, [[WP:ONUS]] applies to the disputed content on either side of a dispute over recently added content. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 01:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::I did want to clarify however that you both have been introducing changes and reverting each other, unless it's being restored to a stable version, [[WP:ONUS]] applies to the disputed content on either side of a dispute over recently added content. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 01:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:34, 7 July 2024

MEDRS tutorials for medical editors

Wikiproject Medicine video guide for new medical editors

July 2024

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Almond. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 00:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zefr: In an edit summary you cited WP:BRD, but you made a bold edit and it was reverted; per WP:ONUS you should be discussing it and getting a consensus before continuously reinserting any newly added changes. Citing 3RR and immediately continuing to edit war yourself with the same number of reverts in the same time period is disruptive, especially when the onus is on you to justify the addition, not the other way around. - Aoidh (talk) 01:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did want to clarify however that you both have been introducing changes and reverting each other, unless it's being restored to a stable version, WP:ONUS applies to the disputed content on either side of a dispute over recently added content. - Aoidh (talk) 01:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]