Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The bubble theory: Difference between revisions
delete |
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Delete''' This is an hypothesis by one author and it has not gained any consensus by the scientific community. The two papers are primary sources and should not be used alone. [[User:Graham Beards|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards|talk]]) 11:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
'''Delete''' This is an hypothesis by one author and it has not gained any consensus by the scientific community. The two papers are primary sources and should not be used alone. [[User:Graham Beards|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards|talk]]) 11:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' One guy's idea with no discernible influence. Not what Wikipedia is for. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 17:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:07, 8 July 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The bubble theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be a novel theory that has seen close to zero uptake in the field so far. I can only find a single reference to the concept and/or paper [1], and that is a passing mention in an unreviewed preprint. This is not at all surprising because the paper was only published a month ago. Someone is trying to use WP as a publicizing platform here. There is as yet no notability basis for this topic. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- In the second paper from 2019 there is a whole section titled Bubble Theory. Jedzwarzywa (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes... the second paper from the same author... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete This is an hypothesis by one author and it has not gained any consensus by the scientific community. The two papers are primary sources and should not be used alone. Graham Beards (talk) 11:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete One guy's idea with no discernible influence. Not what Wikipedia is for. XOR'easter (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)