Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 July 12: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→National Popular Consciousness: fix link |
→National Popular Consciousness: endorse |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I have the impression that the user who closed the discussion was just counting votes not arguments. [[User:D.S. Lioness|D.S. Lioness]] ([[User talk:D.S. Lioness|talk]]) 04:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
I have the impression that the user who closed the discussion was just counting votes not arguments. [[User:D.S. Lioness|D.S. Lioness]] ([[User talk:D.S. Lioness|talk]]) 04:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Endorse''', unanimous save for the nominator. Could not possibly have been closed any other way. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 08:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:08, 12 July 2024
I think the arguments put forward by the participants to deletion discussion do not conform to the Wikipedia guidelines. The main argument was that if the article was not notable it would not have so many sources -I think the issue is not the quantity of sources but the engagement with the subject. The article has many sources that simply reproduce each other, without going deeper.. Also, I pointed out that the sources that do exist do not refer to the party but to its leader, which is not the same thing.
I have the impression that the user who closed the discussion was just counting votes not arguments. D.S. Lioness (talk) 04:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Endorse, unanimous save for the nominator. Could not possibly have been closed any other way. Stifle (talk) 08:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)