Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
*:@[[User:Ravenpuff|Ravenpuff]] Since you moved the page to its current title in 2022, any comment? <span class="nowrap">--[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|<b style="color:#FFF;background:#04A;display:inline-block;padding:1px;vertical-align:middle;font:bold 50%/1 sans-serif;text-align:center">TALK<br />PAGE</b>]])</span> 13:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
*:@[[User:Ravenpuff|Ravenpuff]] Since you moved the page to its current title in 2022, any comment? <span class="nowrap">--[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|<b style="color:#FFF;background:#04A;display:inline-block;padding:1px;vertical-align:middle;font:bold 50%/1 sans-serif;text-align:center">TALK<br />PAGE</b>]])</span> 13:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
*::No opposition to the proposed change (I agree that it's a more recognisable title), but the lead would need to be rewritten slightly to accommodate it as per [[MOS:BOLDLEAD]]. — <span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine','Georgia','Times',serif">'''[[User:Ravenpuff|<span style="color:#006">RAVEN</span><span style="color:#960">PVFF</span>]]'''</span> '''·''' <span>''[[User talk:Ravenpuff|talk]]''</span> '''·''' 13:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
*::No opposition to the proposed change (I agree that it's a more recognisable title), but the lead would need to be rewritten slightly to accommodate it as per [[MOS:BOLDLEAD]]. — <span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine','Georgia','Times',serif">'''[[User:Ravenpuff|<span style="color:#006">RAVEN</span><span style="color:#960">PVFF</span>]]'''</span> '''·''' <span>''[[User talk:Ravenpuff|talk]]''</span> '''·''' 13:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Witness to Your Love (EP) | 2 = Witness to Your Love | discuss = | reason = Remove unnecessary disambiguator | sig = [[User:Vitaazerokelvin|Vitaazerokelvin]] ([[User talk:Vitaazerokelvin|talk]]) 14:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC) | requester = Vitaazerokelvin}}


==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====
==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====

Revision as of 14:08, 24 July 2024

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

  • Orders of magnitude (magnetic field)  Orders of magnitude (magnetic flux density) (currently a redirect back to Orders of magnitude (magnetic field)) (move · discuss) – I would move the page myself, but there is currently a redirect. The page does not compare “magnetic fields” – e.g. earth's magnetic field is much stronger than that of a neodymium magnet – but compares magnetic flux densities, measured in tesla usually right above the magnet's surface. Grufo (talk) 06:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

That should be lowercase per WP:SENTENCECASE. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Tule-hog (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also simply oppose. There are tactics, techniques and procedures involved in many activities. That's not what the article is about. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TTPs is a term in security studies applied to a broader range of attackers than terrorists. See APTs comment. Work has already begun on the article to expand the scope (should the request wait until satisfactorily expanded?). Tule-hog (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are also non-attacking and non-security scenarios that involve tactics, techniques, and procedures. For example, political campaigns have tactics, techniques, and procedures. Nursing involves tactics, techniques, and procedures. Something is needed to identify a context. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From what I've gathered, this is an acronym used specifically in security studies. Only references to the phrase TTP for nursing and politics I could find were in a military context. Tule-hog (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed as reported by multiple media outlets - https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/ahmedabad/daiict-dhirubhai-ambani-university-9188881/lite/ ,
https://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/from-the-assembly/81863020.html#goog_rewarded ,
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/daiict-renamed-dau-ahmedabad-bill-passed-to-change-the-name-of-the-institute/amp_articleshow/108124120.cms ,
https://deshgujarat.com/2024/03/01/gujarat-assembly-approves-renaming-of-daiict-as-dhirubhai-ambani-university/

Alao the published act is out in public and at website which says " after clause (o), the following clause shall be added, namely:- “(p) “University” means the Dhirubhai Ambani University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, a University established under section 3.”." which you can get at this link- https://www.daiict.ac.in/sites/default/files/other-files/Amended_DA-IICT_Act-Gazette_June-2024.pdf 14.139.183.119 (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Common name still appears to be the page name per the official website and most sources. I suggest starting a requested move discussion. C F A 💬 16:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Graham at Amplify "Mascot Books" is still the common name. The article is about "Mascot Books", not its parent company at the moment. C F A 💬 18:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to contest this one. While it would be consistent with many other plant genus at their scientific name rather than common names, this common name is well known among the public. It is almost as popular a common name as Tulip, another genus at its common name rather than at genus Tulipa. Evidence of popularity Google Ngram. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 21:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gryffindor If you wish to continue with this request, please click the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
13:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gryffindor That title was rejected in 2020 at Talk:Bombing of Rangoon in World War II#Requested move 12 October 2020 due to confusion with Rangoon bombing. If you wish to continue with this request, please click the "discuss" link in your request above to open a move discussion. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
13:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed