User talk:Madeforall1

AFDs

Hello, Madeforall1,

You are free to participate in AFD like any editor is. But please take them seriously. Your personal opinion of a subject is not relevant, what's important is to provide policy-based argument and a careful analysis of sources, both those in the article and those brought up in an AFD discussion. You are still gaining experience as an editor and participating in AFDs takes a thorough knowledge of policies and standards of notability so new editors are advised to wait before diving in to these discussions but please do not let another editor intimidate you into removing your comments from a discussion once they are made. You can strike them if you wish but just be careful and put thought into them before offering your assessment of an article and what should happen with it. If you have questions, there is always Teahouse|the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much @Liz, some editors make me feel like I’m not welcomed but I’ll still try, I know I’m doing my best on Wikipedia and I give good contributions. Madeforall1 (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Madeforall1, I'm so disappointed that you are socking. You were a promising editor. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kelblizz has been accepted

DJ Kelblizz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

dxneo (talk) 07:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nigerian gospel music awards

A tag has been placed on Category:Nigerian gospel music awards indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Shallipopi - 2024

@Madeforall1: Please do not revert any edit made on Shallipopi again. Any more revert would be considered as page vandalism. Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Who changed edited his category as “Musician from Benin” ? Madeforall1 (talk) 11:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

@Madeforall1: You made a nice edit there. But do not revert others.. 2RDD (talk) 11:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

The edits are too similar bruh @2RDD, but best regards. Madeforall1 (talk) 11:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Wizkizayo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wizkizayo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted oder deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)