User talk:Orangemonster2k1

If you need help, please ask below. If you have a problem, please ask admins User:El C or User:TenOfAllTrades, they will be glad to help.

/archives

/archive 1
/archive 2

Could I gently suggest

Hi, could I gently suggest that you don't post on Calton's talk page? It's obvious that your posts are unwelcome, and so could be seen as harassment. He's an experienced editor and doesn't need to be warned of the 3RR policy, so why not just stay away? Less stress for both of you. ElinorD (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment on one of the KD's user talk pages.

Probably the best Wiki apology I've ever seen, you owned up to what you did, and apologized for it without requiring anything of the other user (which may or may not have been reasonable). I'm impressed. KP Botany 01:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I was surprised for more than one reason that your apology was accepted, but sometimes that's what you get when you realize you were in the wrong and approach it solely from that perspective, rather than dealing with what anyone else did. It makes it easier at Wikipedia for everyone. You're a bigger man than I am, certainly, for being able to do that. ;) KP Botany 02:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

What I was suggesting with the Stoop!d Monkey deletion

Here's what I had in mind for the Stoop!d Monkey merge into List of Robot Chicken episodes. (I've removed the fair-use images for this talk page comment, since they aren't being used for critical commentary. Instead, I'm putting in a picture of a flour mill.)

Screenshot	Title	Airdate	Episode #	Production Code
	"Junk in the Trunk"	February 20, 2005	1	2
	Rachael Leigh Cook smashes more than eggs in her latest This is Your Brain on Drugs public service announcement. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots, falls prey to prostate cancer. The outcome is never in doubt during "World's Most One-Sided Fistfights Caught on Film." Outtakes from The Dukes of Hazzard, The X-Files, Battlestar Galactica and more come to light in "Bloopers."
	Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to hit his tail with a hammer.
	"Nutcracker Sweet"	February 27, 2005	2	5
	Voltron engages in an old-school dance-off in "You Got Robo-Served." The secret lives of nature's most fascinating beasts are exposed in "Secrets of the Animal Kingdom." Testicles are terrorized in "Ode to the Nut Shot." Walt Disney's severed head with its giant robotic spider-body attacks Cuba.
	Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is smoking an entire pack of cigarettes in his mouth.
	"Gold Dust Gasoline"	March 6, 2005	3	6
	The animals Noah left behind try to survive the flood in their very own ark. Enjoy instant nostalgia with "That '00s Show." Mrs. McNally's third-graders produce an animated abomination in "The Best Cowboy." The world's most famous cars, from KITT to the the General Lee and even Mario karts, race against each other in "3 Fast 3 Furious."
	Stoop!d Monkey logo: He is about to whack a beehive with a stick.

That was what I had in mind. That way, we don't have to keep a separate list that runs parallel to the main list of episodes. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 04:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem

Yeah...I've done the same thing with info-boxes. Totally fouled up WMMO in Orlando by using the copy and paste method from WFXH-FM!!! Oh well, stuff happens. Thanks for helping out...one of these days I want to finish the Southside VA radio pages...one of these days:) Radio-x 05:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Stoopid Monkey Logos

Hi. I've gone back over the AfD, and my opinion was in relation to the base content itself in the context of the original nomination. My delete vote was purely in the context that notability was not established for the subject of the article and therefore per policy needed to be deleted. However, as the content had obviously been cleaned up it was a consensus of keep. The issue of the logos list as far as I can see is a separate issue to the AfD discussion. The main point being contested by other editors in relation to the logos is Reliable sources and what wikipedia is not. Having reviewed the article history, I am of the opinion that the the list of logos at issue here is not of encyclopaedic merit and adds no value to the article on the subject whatsoever. Additionally, the referenced source used for the content is deemed to be self-published research and threfore does not meet the criteria set down in the Reliable sources polocy. Therefore, the content in dispute can and should be easily removed in accordance with relevant policy. In regards to the blocking you received, both you and Calton both engaged in edit warring that was deemed to be in breach of the three revert rule. I have taken a look at the reasons for the block, and I would concur that the blocking admin Dmcdevit (A longtime WP user and current Bureaucrat) was legitimate and justified. In terms of requesting a block on the page, it's unlikely to be granted either full or semi-protection as there has not been enough activity to justify it. Regrettably, after reviewing this matter I have seen fit to file 3RR reports against the both of you for your actions in relation to this article in the preceding 24hrs. I would strongly encourage you to use this time to step back and have a good think about the matter before taking any further action. Thewinchester ^(talk) 06:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)