User talk:GordonWatts: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
GordonWatts (talk | contribs) |
GordonWatts (talk | contribs) →Blocked: r Friday |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::I agree there could be the perception of a conflict of interest here, so I have undone JzG's block. However I see no evidence at all that you're here to contribute usefully to the project, rather it looks like your goal is to waste our time, so I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 20:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC) |
::I agree there could be the perception of a conflict of interest here, so I have undone JzG's block. However I see no evidence at all that you're here to contribute usefully to the project, rather it looks like your goal is to waste our time, so I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 20:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::I was trying to contribute when Bish and Nandesuka began vandalizing my pages. When I realized they were not to blame, I asked myself "Why are they acting this way," and I reaslised that JzG slandered me and made false accusations that he had concensus when even after repeatedly beating a dead horse, and let people vote multiple times, he could not even get 50% to support any one sanction. So, since he violated "concensus" policy, I saw violation. ''Also,'' Guy used inappropriate language on his page, much worse than anything I have ever done, do I sought community action against him there too. Yes, maybe I too have a conflict of interest, but, as the victim, my right to bring action outweighs any COI concerns. However, if my only "crime" was in bringing a community action against him, you are unjustified in taking action. If you have a case, state it in the community page. But to remove my community action is violating Jimbo's orders: "Jimbo has said that "7. Anyone with a complaint should be treated with the utmost respect and dignity," so I would hope that no one wises to punish me for brining this valid complaint." This is not right.--[[User:GordonWatts|GordonWatts]] 20:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:24, 22 May 2007
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive01
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive02
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive03
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive04
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive05
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive06
User_talk:GordonWatts/Archive07
It's not current
Your complaint is not current - it was flushed. So this IS the right place. --Fredrick day 19:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Falso. It was not my complaint; It was Calton's complaint. Take your discussion to thye proper forum.--GordonWatts 19:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
I have blocked you for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Posted to WP:AN for review. As far as I can tell you are doing nothign to repay the incredible wastage of time you inflict on the Wikipedia community. Guy (Help!) 20:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding [1], you have a conflict of interest: Step aside. (PS: I am not trying to "make" a point. I am trying to enforce policy.)--GordonWatts 20:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree there could be the perception of a conflict of interest here, so I have undone JzG's block. However I see no evidence at all that you're here to contribute usefully to the project, rather it looks like your goal is to waste our time, so I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. Friday (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I was trying to contribute when Bish and Nandesuka began vandalizing my pages. When I realized they were not to blame, I asked myself "Why are they acting this way," and I reaslised that JzG slandered me and made false accusations that he had concensus when even after repeatedly beating a dead horse, and let people vote multiple times, he could not even get 50% to support any one sanction. So, since he violated "concensus" policy, I saw violation. Also, Guy used inappropriate language on his page, much worse than anything I have ever done, do I sought community action against him there too. Yes, maybe I too have a conflict of interest, but, as the victim, my right to bring action outweighs any COI concerns. However, if my only "crime" was in bringing a community action against him, you are unjustified in taking action. If you have a case, state it in the community page. But to remove my community action is violating Jimbo's orders: "Jimbo has said that "7. Anyone with a complaint should be treated with the utmost respect and dignity," so I would hope that no one wises to punish me for brining this valid complaint." This is not right.--GordonWatts 20:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)