Talk:Remand (court procedure): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:15, 18 June 2005

Why was "may not have to work or attend (prison) education" removed from the list of benefits of a remand prisoner? Whilst I understand this may not be true worldwide, its certainly true in some prisons in Australia. -- Longhair | Talk 22:11, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm adding this back in. The ip that removed it has 2 edits and hasn't replied here after some time. -- Longhair | Talk 07:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Half an article?

Is there any reason why a principle, perhaps primary, definition of remand ("To send back. The sending by the appellate court of the cause [sic] back to the same court out of which it came, for purpose of having some further action taken on it there." Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, ©1979) doesn't appear in this article? Unless there is objection or some other issue of which I'm unaware, I'll edit the article to include it in a day or two. Duckecho 05:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :I'm adding this back in. The ip that removed it has 2 edits and hasn't replied here after some time. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] | [[User talk:Longhair|Talk]] 07:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
+== Half an article? ==
+Is there any reason why a principle, perhaps primary, definition of remand ("''To send back. The sending by the appellate court of the cause ''[sic]'' back to the same court out of which it came, for purpose of having some further action taken on it there.''" <b>Black's Law Dictionary</b>, Fifth Edition, &copy;1979) doesn't appear in this article? Unless there is objection or some other issue of which I'm unaware, I'll edit the article to include it in a day or two. [[User:Duckecho|Duckecho]] 05:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)