Jump to content

Talk:Computer case screws: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WebHamster (talk | contribs)
References using "Dan's Data"
 
Reswobslc (talk | contribs)
zzz
Line 1: Line 1:
References using [http://www.dansdata.com/danletters053.htm "Dan's Data"]. I'm not sure that this website could be considered, in [[WP:RS|Wikipedia terms]], to be a reliable source. It just appears to be a questions and answers page and not much more than a blog of sorts. Googleing Daniel Rutter just says he is a journalist, it doesn't demonstrate that he or his site is a reliable source. There is nothing I can find on his website that attests to his technical qualifications or anything that demonstrates the site's validity under WP:RS. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 11:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
References using [http://www.dansdata.com/danletters053.htm "Dan's Data"]. I'm not sure that this website could be considered, in [[WP:RS|Wikipedia terms]], to be a reliable source. It just appears to be a questions and answers page and not much more than a blog of sorts. Googleing Daniel Rutter just says he is a journalist, it doesn't demonstrate that he or his site is a reliable source. There is nothing I can find on his website that attests to his technical qualifications or anything that demonstrates the site's validity under WP:RS. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 11:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

: That guy also happens to have a blog - the reference is not to the blog. Incidentally, when the claim is merely what gauge of screw is holding your computer together, the bar isn't quite as high as you make it out to be. The guy holds himself to be an ''"independent reviewer of PC hardware and gadgets"'' and given the circumstances, that's plenty. [[User:Reswobslc|Reswobslc]] 14:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:21, 29 September 2007

References using "Dan's Data". I'm not sure that this website could be considered, in Wikipedia terms, to be a reliable source. It just appears to be a questions and answers page and not much more than a blog of sorts. Googleing Daniel Rutter just says he is a journalist, it doesn't demonstrate that he or his site is a reliable source. There is nothing I can find on his website that attests to his technical qualifications or anything that demonstrates the site's validity under WP:RS. ---- WebHamster 11:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That guy also happens to have a blog - the reference is not to the blog. Incidentally, when the claim is merely what gauge of screw is holding your computer together, the bar isn't quite as high as you make it out to be. The guy holds himself to be an "independent reviewer of PC hardware and gadgets" and given the circumstances, that's plenty. Reswobslc 14:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]