Jump to content

Talk:The Mrs Bradley Mysteries: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m added missing infobox notation
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TelevisionWikiProject|needs-infobox=yes}}
{{TelevisionWikiProject|needs-infobox=yes}}
{{British TV shows project}}
{{British TV shows project}}

I'm aware that ''The Mrs Bradley Mysteries'' have been criticised for not being true to the books (in which, for instance, Dame Beatrice is described as dry and reptilian, which doesn't match the glamorous character played by Ms Rigg), and for changing significant elements of the stories "to accord with the scriptwriters' stereotypical notions of what people between the wars ought to have been preoccupied with, and how they ought to have behaved"[http://www.ansible.co.uk/cc/cc114.html]. Would it be appropriate to add this to the article (with references) or would it be a NPOV violation?

Revision as of 22:18, 23 February 2008

WikiProject iconTelevision Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Template:British TV shows project

I'm aware that The Mrs Bradley Mysteries have been criticised for not being true to the books (in which, for instance, Dame Beatrice is described as dry and reptilian, which doesn't match the glamorous character played by Ms Rigg), and for changing significant elements of the stories "to accord with the scriptwriters' stereotypical notions of what people between the wars ought to have been preoccupied with, and how they ought to have behaved"[1]. Would it be appropriate to add this to the article (with references) or would it be a NPOV violation?