User talk:Oneismany: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Arbitration: new section |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::''"The current form of the [[9/11]] article is at odds with the WP:NPOV policy, and the proposed inclusion of the fact that [[Michael Meacher]] alleges the US government of willfully not preventing the attacks, would make the article better, in stead of worse.'' |
::''"The current form of the [[9/11]] article is at odds with the WP:NPOV policy, and the proposed inclusion of the fact that [[Michael Meacher]] alleges the US government of willfully not preventing the attacks, would make the article better, in stead of worse.'' |
||
I would appreciate it when you could take a look. — <small>[[User:Xiutwel|Xiutwel]] ♫☺♥♪ [[User_talk:Xiutwel|(speech has the power to bind the absolute)]]</small> 17:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC) |
I would appreciate it when you could take a look. — <small>[[User:Xiutwel|Xiutwel]] ♫☺♥♪ [[User_talk:Xiutwel|(speech has the power to bind the absolute)]]</small> 17:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Arbitration == |
|||
I have named you as an involved party at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#9/11 conspiracy theories]]. [[User:Ice Cold Beer|Ice Cold Beer]] ([[User talk:Ice Cold Beer|talk]]) 22:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:21, 17 March 2008
Welcome to my talk page!
Norman Mineta
Dear Oneismany,
I would welcome any improvements you could make to my proposal at Talk:9/11#Norman Mineta testimony issue ! — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 06:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
request your input in a consensus survey re 9/11
Dear Oneismany,
At Talk:9/11#defining consensus I started a survey to get a better picture on how editor's opinions are varying with respect to the following statement:
- "The current form of the 9/11 article is at odds with the WP:NPOV policy, and the proposed inclusion of the fact that Michael Meacher alleges the US government of willfully not preventing the attacks, would make the article better, in stead of worse.
I would appreciate it when you could take a look. — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 17:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration
I have named you as an involved party at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#9/11 conspiracy theories. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)