Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lake Ontario: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Microchip08 (talk | contribs) m →Lake Ontario: Disqualifying vote |
Mad Tinman (talk | contribs) →Lake Ontario: I don't think that it was a vote, much more a comment . Comments from annons are still allowed, I did plenty in my day. |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Oppose''' per Uncle Bungle. '''[[User:Crassic|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#cc6600">crassic]]'''!<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User_talk:Crassic|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup></span> 03:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' per Uncle Bungle. '''[[User:Crassic|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#cc6600">crassic]]'''!<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User_talk:Crassic|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup></span> 03:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Where are we getting this glimpse from? If the location is significant - some sort of cave, or historic location - this could be encyclopaedic, but as it is, we're not getting enough info. [[User:Shoemaker's Holiday|Shoemaker's Holiday]] ([[User talk:Shoemaker's Holiday|talk]]) 12:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' Where are we getting this glimpse from? If the location is significant - some sort of cave, or historic location - this could be encyclopaedic, but as it is, we're not getting enough info. [[User:Shoemaker's Holiday|Shoemaker's Holiday]] ([[User talk:Shoemaker's Holiday|talk]]) 12:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
*<small |
*<small>All right! I kind of figured thats its got a low encyclopedic value. Probably this picture would be well off calling it just a lake rather than Lake Ontario. And as far as the location is concerned, it was one of those snowy days and this glimpse was from a window between icy patches. No caves. Taken from the ground level of the bridge. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/165.170.128.65|165.170.128.65]] ([[User talk:165.170.128.65|talk]]) 13:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--></small> |
||
**Sorry, anon votes are not allowed. Please sign in. |
**Sorry, anon votes are not allowed. Please sign in. |
||
Revision as of 19:58, 19 March 2008
Reason: A nice shot- natural and vibrant colors. A very different perspective view of the Lake.
- Creator
- User:Sidsizzle
- Support -nice clear one Aswink (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose low encyclopedic value for the subject matter. A very pretty shot, but something with the scale of Lake Ontario can't be described with a view through a window, sorry. --Uncle Bungle (talk) 02:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose a nice shot but doesn't really help illustarte the intended
structuresubject - low encyclopaedic value. Guest9999 (talk) 02:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC) - Oppose per Uncle Bungle. crassic![talk] 03:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Where are we getting this glimpse from? If the location is significant - some sort of cave, or historic location - this could be encyclopaedic, but as it is, we're not getting enough info. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- All right! I kind of figured thats its got a low encyclopedic value. Probably this picture would be well off calling it just a lake rather than Lake Ontario. And as far as the location is concerned, it was one of those snowy days and this glimpse was from a window between icy patches. No caves. Taken from the ground level of the bridge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.170.128.65 (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, anon votes are not allowed. Please sign in.