User talk:Leitmanp: Difference between revisions
John Carter (talk | contribs) →Western Asia banner: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Which article(s) are tagged as "C" class, so that I can ensure that the changes made to the banner work as they're intended to. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC) |
Which article(s) are tagged as "C" class, so that I can ensure that the changes made to the banner work as they're intended to. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Image Problem == |
|||
Hey Leitmanp, why do you revert all the edits i do. You say you have to "discuss" all your edits, but they're are so many edits you do which are not discussed and they're are so many edits which other people do which are also not discussed. You don't own wikipedia neither do you own any articles. So just because you don't like how a page looks doesn't mean that someone else won't. I mean for example the Abu Dhabi article sucks. They're are so many mistkakes, wrong facts, and one of the most boring city articles. Look at the Dubai article, everything is so organised and their is a link with every word as well as keeping the page very balanced and informative. |
|||
Another point is the Dubai airport article. The page is basically messed up. It is so small. Infact they're lots of spelling mistakes and incomplete sentences, not to mention extremely wrong facts brought up. The reason i don't correct them and provide a link or a source for them is because people like you will just revert them. All these articles are so boring, they need more images, and better information. So stop acting like you control these articles, because you don't, you share editing it. ([[User:MoHasanie|MoHasanie]] ([[User talk:MoHasanie|talk]]) 23:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 23:02, 22 July 2008
Archive 1 (May 2006 - August 2007) |
List of tallest buildings and structures in London
Hi there. Quick message to notify you that I've added comments to Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of tallest buildings and structures in London. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Tall Tower / Al Burj ; 1400 m?
You may want to read the first post of the Tall Tower thread on Skyscraperpage. I think it's the meed.com article published on 2008-06-20 discussing the height and name change. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 01:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Then we should at least add a note regarding this article. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 19:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Erledigt No, it didn't need rewording, but a note-link in the lead section. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 19:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome!
Even though I've been editing skyscaper articles for a while, it's nice to feel part of the larger project! –Cg-realms (talk • contribs) 19:01, 13 June 2008 (EDT) —Preceding comment was actually added at 23:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
FL Thanks
Thanks for your efforts
![]() | This user helped promote List of tallest buildings in Chicago to featured list status. |
--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Dubai Tennis Championships colors
Hello and thanks for what you said on my work ! I've changed the Dubai event's default color to red because most of the other events have a specific color, and I thought Dubai should have one too, and I chose that specific red because I thought it was close to the one used in the Dubai flag. But I agree with you it makes the text difficult to read, and I'm willing to change it. I think that a lighter red, like the Terra cotta would be fine and make the text easier to read, but if you think that another color would suit Dubai better, you can look yourself here.
I also want to say that the spaces around the tournament templates you removed on the Dubai Championships pages should actually be kept, as it has been the consensus for a few months already to have them on tennis events articles, for aesthetic reasons - so I'm going to put them back, as line breaks, rather than as spaces. Cheers, --Plafond (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Any color would work actually, so feel free to propose something entirely different if you want (if not, I'll change to burnt sienna). As for the spaces, I believe it's actually a case of silent consensus. Some users started to do this a few months ago and it has been accepted by regular tennis editors, and the line breaks are now present on every new event page created. I've put spaces on articles written in early 2008 for the sake of consistency, but I don't know if there was a particular discussion on the subject (I think the spaces improve the look of the pages, but I guess it's a matter of personal taste). Cheers, --Plafond (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Renaissance Square
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Renaissance Square, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sandstein 09:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Sheikh vs Shaikh
Hi; regarding your recent changes to Category:Shaikhs_of_the_emirates_of_the_United_Arab_Emirates and its articles and subcategories, "Shaikh" is not a mis-spelling. See article Sheikh, where it gives alternate English spellings. If you feel that the categories should be renamed to "Sheikh" to conform with the spelling of the article Sheikh, the proper method would be to propose name changes for the categories at WP:CFD. And in any case, if you think a mis-spelling has occurred, the proper place to propose the change would be WP:CFDS. In the meantime, I've changed the categories back to the original spelling. Thanks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 10:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Western Asia banner
Which article(s) are tagged as "C" class, so that I can ensure that the changes made to the banner work as they're intended to. John Carter (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Image Problem
Hey Leitmanp, why do you revert all the edits i do. You say you have to "discuss" all your edits, but they're are so many edits you do which are not discussed and they're are so many edits which other people do which are also not discussed. You don't own wikipedia neither do you own any articles. So just because you don't like how a page looks doesn't mean that someone else won't. I mean for example the Abu Dhabi article sucks. They're are so many mistkakes, wrong facts, and one of the most boring city articles. Look at the Dubai article, everything is so organised and their is a link with every word as well as keeping the page very balanced and informative.
Another point is the Dubai airport article. The page is basically messed up. It is so small. Infact they're lots of spelling mistakes and incomplete sentences, not to mention extremely wrong facts brought up. The reason i don't correct them and provide a link or a source for them is because people like you will just revert them. All these articles are so boring, they need more images, and better information. So stop acting like you control these articles, because you don't, you share editing it. (MoHasanie (talk) 23:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC))