Wikipedia talk:Blow it up and start over: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dream Focus (talk | contribs) |
→My questions about this: reply |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I don't. Read more carefully. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] - [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 02:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
:I don't. Read more carefully. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] - [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 02:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
::If the subject is clearly a valid one, then you can find valid content. There would surely be something out there someone could find to write about it. As for your statement, ''"Sometimes, the damage is completely irreparable''", I'm curious. Do you just not like how it is written, or do you mean it fails the current notability guidelines? [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 02:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
::If the subject is clearly a valid one, then you can find valid content. There would surely be something out there someone could find to write about it. As for your statement, ''"Sometimes, the damage is completely irreparable''", I'm curious. Do you just not like how it is written, or do you mean it fails the current notability guidelines? [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 02:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::What is "it" in this case? This isn't just about articles, and has little to do with notability. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] - [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 02:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:52, 3 May 2009
Interesting article. Its purpose? Its notability? It seems (so far) to be opinion based upon observation... and not backed up by any sourcing., making it WP:OR. Will this change? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Last I checked, Wikipedia space stuff wasn't constrained by WP:V. I haven't linked this anywhere, either. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 02:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
My questions about this
I don't understand why you want to destroy everything, and start over from scratch. Just make a list of what content is worth keeping, discuss what should be done on the talk page, and work on it. List all relevant facts, and organize them in a proper manner, then write them out in a coherent manner. Can you provide a list to articles you believe should be Blown up and started over? Dream Focus 02:41, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't. Read more carefully. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 02:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- If the subject is clearly a valid one, then you can find valid content. There would surely be something out there someone could find to write about it. As for your statement, "Sometimes, the damage is completely irreparable", I'm curious. Do you just not like how it is written, or do you mean it fails the current notability guidelines? Dream Focus 02:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- What is "it" in this case? This isn't just about articles, and has little to do with notability. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 02:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- If the subject is clearly a valid one, then you can find valid content. There would surely be something out there someone could find to write about it. As for your statement, "Sometimes, the damage is completely irreparable", I'm curious. Do you just not like how it is written, or do you mean it fails the current notability guidelines? Dream Focus 02:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)