Jump to content

User talk:Icseaturtles: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Pioneer Square: new section
m →‎Pioneer Square: erm, wrong article, same issue.
Line 138: Line 138:
== Pioneer Square ==
== Pioneer Square ==


FYI, the edits to Pioneer Square are spillover from Portland's [[Pioneer Courthouse Square]]. He's been a super-long-term sockpuppet. Here's more info:
FYI, the edits to Pioneer Place are spillover from Portland's [[Pioneer Courthouse Square]]. He's been a super-long-term sockpuppet. Here's more info:
* [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse]]
* [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse]]
* [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse/Archive]]
* [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse/Archive]]
And sorry for causing him to head north! [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 05:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
<s>And sorry for causing him to head north!</s> (erm, thought it was to Pioneer Square, not Pioneer Place) [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 05:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:02, 26 May 2009

Welcome to Icseaturtle's Talk Page!
Userpage. Contributions.
If you leave a comment on my talk page I will respond here. If I leave a comment on a user's talk page, or an article's talk page I will respond there. This is my attempt to keep things orderly, fluent, and cohesive. Thank you for helping! Please be sure to sign your post with four tildes~.

Welcome!

Hello, Icseaturtles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --plange 01:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Big shiny welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Firefly WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Firefly's coverage of topics.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Starting some new articles? Our style guidelines outline some things to include.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Firefly article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow Browncoat, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Keep flyin'plange 01:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still active with the Trivia Cleanup project?

I was wondering if you were still active with the Trivia Cleanup project. Seeing as how Category:Articles with large trivia sections hasn't gone down much, I figured many people became inactive. I've created a talk page discussion here, asking if people are active or not: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trivia_Cleanup#Who_is_still_active_with_the_project.3F. RobJ1981 06:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for this edit. I have no idea how that got through! --Wafulz 06:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

RE US Judge Edward Lodge and your response on "neutrality":

The truth is always neutral. Either do the research for yourself and prove me and all those who are doing and have done the research wrong, or leave the changes alone!

Your ASSUMPTION that the changes are not neutral and based upon fact - in the absence of any research whatsoever on your part - is the act of an uneducated ignoramous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Constitutionalist (talkcontribs) 21:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that I reversed your section in error, then I encourage you to rework and incorporate references to support your claims. Wikipedia strives to maintain a neutral tone in its writing, and once more I encourage you to take a look at WP:NPV in helping with this. Also please note that Wikipedia also maintains a policy of WP:NPA, and it is in everyone's best interest to respect this. Icseaturtles 21:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Got the help I needed

Thanks for the bailout with the dos vandalism turtles, I was trying to undo but couldn't keep up with the clown ;D Thoughtful Goose (talk) 09:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Work

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I've got to say, you've beat me to the mark in reverting vandalism several times tonight. It looks like you've been doing a lot; you should have a barn star! Sophus Bie (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Probs

Anytime dude, I Really appreciate when people thank me for that cheers :D Jamesööders (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

thank you for reverting that spot of vandalism to my user talk page whist I was offline, really appreciated. All the best SpitfireTally-ho! 08:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting my userpage in return afterwards ! :) Neutralle 10:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem once again :) I think it is turning regular because we both battle vandalism at the same time. We might as well work together :D Neutralle 21:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously

How many times have I been told to "refrain from vandalizing Wikipedia", and that "such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted"? Guess what. Posting those dumb warning templates and trying to scare me doesn't work. --221.220.178.189 (talk) 10:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think this users blanking of List of San Diego Gangs was because they have also created List of San Diego County Gangs, and they didn't want the first one any more. I have taken the blanking as a request for deletion. Kevin (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's really weird I didn't catch that, since Huggle usually asks if the page should be tagged G7 when it is blanked by its creator. Nothing came up, so I assumed it was just a vandal blanking. Thanks for letting me know. - Icseaturtles 05:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I also see you just beat me to removing the warning from their talk page. Thanks again. Cheers - Icseaturtles 05:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slander

That wasn't vandalism. That was a caption clarification. Please assume good faith and please don't bite the newcomers, per the policy of this 'pedia. Thnx. 69.133.98.118 (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I always try to assume good faith before deciding to revert suspected vandalism. Your edit[1] to Sleep in my opinion appears then, and now to be misrepresentative of the actions being portrayed in the picture. I did not put a warning template on your talk page since I saw you had previous constructive edits within Wikipedia, and I was trying not to bite a newcomer/fellow editor with a previously constructive track record. I see that User:Hordaland did place a vandalism warning on your talk page for the edit which I reverted. If you still feel that your caption better suits the picture, then I would recommend that you bring the matter up for discussion on the article's talk page.

Icseaturtles 02:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Pleasure

Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. --Abce2|AccessDenied 02:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HEY!

No Problem. OtisJimmyOne 01:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect

Are you able to semi-protect U2. There have a lot of vandalisms there of late.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 04:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see semi-protection has already been requested for U2 at WP:RFP [2]. Icseaturtles 04:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer Square

FYI, the edits to Pioneer Place are spillover from Portland's Pioneer Courthouse Square. He's been a super-long-term sockpuppet. Here's more info:

And sorry for causing him to head north! (erm, thought it was to Pioneer Square, not Pioneer Place) tedder (talk) 05:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]