Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperatives: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Participants list: added my name to the WP: Co-op List
Erik9bot (talk | contribs)
remove template per TFD
Line 122: Line 122:


{{WikiProject Footer}}
{{WikiProject Footer}}
{{WPCouncilRec}}
[[Category:WikiProject Cooperatives|Cooperatives]]
[[Category:WikiProject Cooperatives|Cooperatives]]

Revision as of 15:34, 21 August 2009

Fagor Arrasate assembly plant. Part of the Mondragón Cooperative Corporation.


Our scope

The scope of this project is to provide an overall cohesion to all topics related to Cooperatives and the cooperative movement as well as to provide a space where users can collaborate to improve related articles.

Participants

This user is a member of the Cooperatives WikiProject.

If you are interested in helping out with the project in any capacity, please visit Category:WikiProject Cooperatives participants and add yourself to our participants list.

Participants list

  1. Gobonobo
  2. Mtiedemann
  3. AmishThrasher 11:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Arsenikk
  5. Brett epic
  6. Doug.(talk contribs) 20:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Graham
  8. leahtwosaints
  9. Pearrari
  10. Hroðulf or Hrothulf
  11. Whoneedspants

Article Assessment

How to Assess an Article

Assessing an article is simple.

  1. Go to the category by clicking on Unassessed in the assessment box at the top of this page. You will see a list of articles in need of assessment.
  2. Click on an article link - this should take you to the talk page
  3. Click on the "Article" tab - look at the article and make an assessment
  4. Click on the "Discussion" tab - this should return you to the talk page
  5. Click the "Edit this Page" tab. You will see {{cooperatives|class=|importance=}} at the top of the page.
  6. Fill in the tag's attributes
    1. Fill in class= using one of these values: Stub, Start, B, GA, A, FA. (Before assessing, please note the following definitions:)
    2. Fill in importance= using one of these values: Top, High, Mid, Low.
  7. You're done! (unless you want to go back to Unassessed and do another assessment) -- we hope you will!

Note: You can also put the tag {{cooperatives|class=|importance=}} on any cooperative article you come across that hasn't yet been associated with this project. This will add it to the list of unassessed topics.

Assessment Standards

FA Criteria

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and features professional standards of writing and presentation. In addition to meeting the requirements for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes:

  1. It is well written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and stable.
    • (a) "Well written" means that the prose is compelling, even brilliant.
    • (b) "Comprehensive" means that the article does not neglect major facts and details.
    • (c) "Factually accurate" means that claims are attributable to reliable sources and accurately present the related body of published knowledge. Claims are supported with specific evidence and external citations; this involves the provision of a "References" section in which sources are set out, complemented by inline citations for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. See the attribution policy for information on when and how extensively references are provided, and citing sources for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes or endnotes, the meta:cite format is recommended.
    • (d) "Neutral" means that the article presents views fairly and without bias (see neutral point of view); however, articles need not give minority views equal coverage (see undue weight).
    • (e) "Stable" means that the article is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and that its content does not change significantly from day to day; vandalism reverts and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.
  2. It complies with the standards set out in the manual of style and relevant WikiProjects, including:
    • (a) a concise lead section that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the higher level of detail in the subsequent sections;
    • (b) a proper system of hierarchical headings; and
    • (c) a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents (see section help).
  3. It should have images if they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. If non-free content images are used, they must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly.
  4. It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Collaboration of the Month (Beta version)

Suggestions

Participants of assessing please feel free to suggest some important articles you have come across:

Tasks

Template:Cooptasks

To add this to your user page, insert {{Cooptasks}}.

Templates

For placement at the top of the talk page of any Cooperative-related article use {{cooperatives|class=|importance=}} - which results in the following banner:

-

WikiProject iconCooperatives Unassessed (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Infoboxes

Some UK organisations can use

Short articles

Insert stub templates for very short articles.

  • To mark an article as stub, insert an appropriate stub template from list of stubs.
  • To create a new stub category, propose the new stub category at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals.
  • For articles, that are not stubs, but do not cover the subject-matter in depth, insert the {{expand}} tag on their talk page.

Browsing articles

Lists of topics

Allgemein
Menschen
Organisations


Other

Other schemes

Pages needing attention

Wikipedia:Pages needing attention listings are no longer being updated. For by-topic listings of articles that need attention, see:

To flag an article for attention, add a cleanup template to the article or talk page. See Wikipedia:Template index/Cleanup for a listing. All previously listed articles have either been fixed or tagged.

See also the page history of Wikipedia:Votes for rewrite which ran from May 2002-June 2003 then was redirected to here.

Alerts

Template:ArticleAlertbotSubscription