User talk:Moby-Dick3000

No. In fact, if you look at his talk page, you'll see I'd already posted a note to that effect, to try to minimize confusion. I did the same on the talk pages of some articels where he's mentioned. Obviously, I couldn't do the same in the actual articles. Peter jackson (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Life of the Buddha

I saw you made a lot of edits to the section. I didn't look at all of them (takes a bit long for each diff to load), so i can't tell you if i like them all, but your editing inspired me to look at the section a bit closer. I hope my additions don't conflict with what you had in mind for that section. Also: please don't take offense by my edit summaries. I somehow got the impression you were shortening too much and only later realized that your edits were actually quite surgical :) I'd be happy if you let me know if u like my additions; or not, of course :) My idea was to provide the first-time reader of the Buddhas life story with at least a wee bit more background info, i.e. use this possible first encounter with a reader new to Buddhism to leave him with at least some idea of what "enlightenment" could mean (i imagine, many readers will start with the life story). Thanx, with metta, Andi 3ö (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Wild things

I see that you were previously warned against including such information per policy. Please take the time to read links that are posted in edit summaries, as it is quite obvious that you did not, otherwise you would know the reason the section was removed. I also posted a reply stating something similar on the article talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 00:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Secondly, please sign your posts with four ~s(~~~~).— Dædαlus ^Contribs 00:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC

Also, citing policy in a summary does constitute a warning. You were told what policy the material violated and you added it in anyway, you cannot claim ignorance.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 01:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Your personal talk page,

Wikipedia is not a social network, and this talk page is not yours. The purpose of the talk page is communication in regard to improving the encyclopedia, it is not be be used simply for praise. Lastly, please heed the following suggestion: splitting discussions as you do onto separate pages in your userspace is not advised. No one looks there, they either wait on their own talk page, or they watch your talk page. It is nothing more than a fluke that I found that message.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 01:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Any user can leave another user warnings. One doesn't have to be an admin to do so. No, I will not stay off of your talk page if you willingly violate policy, I will warn you as we are instructed to do. Fourthly, the userspace is not considered a sandbox, the page you created was not a sandbox before like you purport, but was created by you, today with the response you had for me. It is not weird to monitor the activities of a user who was knowingly violating policy. Lastly, I will not use an article talk page to talk with you. Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article ONLY. That is what they are for, as described at WP:TALK. They are not to be used as user-to-user communication, that is what this talk page is for, and I shall use it as it was meant to be used if you continue to violate policy.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 01:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

For transparency, the page that says ordinary users are allowed to warn other users. Yes, I realize the page is about vandalism, but still the point remains the same. I am not acting like an administrator, I am acting like a user. Any user is allowed to warn any other user, period. Lastly, go on, report me. I'm not doing anything wrong. Informing a user of policy is not against the rules. You can't report me for simply replying to you.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 02:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Note,

If you want to report me, try WP:ANI, but, as a warning, it will not go anywhere. None of my messages were incivil, they were simply blunt(straight to the point). Secondly, I only know that you posted that page in your userspace because when one watches the page of an article or user, the wikimedia software instead watches the both the main page and the talk page for said main page. Sometimes I watch the talk page of a user in case that user replies at their talk page.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 04:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Alone

I am going to leave you alone for now however, as there is nothing to discuss. But I will come back here if your edits to that particular article conflict with policy, in order to tell you of such policy.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 05:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Well done Daedalus95. Another good example of your hard and tireless work to preserve the pillars of the wikipedia community. I salute you. Dingding12 (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First test

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dac04 (talk) 19:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)