Talk:Laurie Nash: Difference between revisions
m updating template parameters, Replaced: |status=}} → |status=|note=}},, Removed: reviewer=|, using AWB |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Note to potential Good Article reviewers== |
==Note to potential Good Article reviewers== |
||
I nominated this article and unfortunately I will be away on business for two weeks. All going well I will return the weekend of 7 November. If you're looking to review this article, feel free to kick back until my return when I can give the review my full attention, cheers. --[[User:Roisterer|Roisterer]] ([[User talk:Roisterer|talk]]) 11:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
I nominated this article and unfortunately I will be away on business for two weeks. All going well I will return the weekend of 7 November. If you're looking to review this article, feel free to kick back until my return when I can give the review my full attention, cheers. --[[User:Roisterer|Roisterer]] ([[User talk:Roisterer|talk]]) 11:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
: I'm back so let the reviewing begin! --[[User:Roisterer|Roisterer]] ([[User talk:Roisterer|talk]]) 09:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:13, 9 November 2009
Biography B‑class | |||||||
|
Australien: Australian rules football B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Cricket B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
Laurie Nash is currently a Sports and recreation good article nominee. Nominated by Roisterer (talk) at 07:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
Undue weight on bowling average
He played in two Tests, and one of them was a dreadful sticky, in which he took 5/22, which was on a par with South Africa's 20/81. This is skewing his stats (apart from the fact we don't know if he could have sustained the 5/104 odd for any lenght of time either) and I think maybe the stat shouldn't be in the lead because it can be misleading. It would be similar to saying that Harvey has a 100% win rate as captain, he only played in one Test. YellowMonkey (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 03:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- thanks for feedback; have omitted it from lead. --Roisterer (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Good luck :) The scorecard refs looks a bit unwell. Also can you use another ref apart from Stats.Rleague.com? As it isn't considered entirely reliable. Aaroncrick (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- By whom and why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.98.97 (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll try to make the scorecard refs healthier. Not sure about an alternative to stas.rleague but I'll see what I can dig up. Cheers. --Roisterer (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Good luck :) The scorecard refs looks a bit unwell. Also can you use another ref apart from Stats.Rleague.com? As it isn't considered entirely reliable. Aaroncrick (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Note to potential Good Article reviewers
I nominated this article and unfortunately I will be away on business for two weeks. All going well I will return the weekend of 7 November. If you're looking to review this article, feel free to kick back until my return when I can give the review my full attention, cheers. --Roisterer (talk) 11:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm back so let the reviewing begin! --Roisterer (talk) 09:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- B-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Australian rules football articles
- High-importance Australian rules football articles
- WikiProject Australian rules football articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- B-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- B-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review