Jump to content

Talk:Laurie Nash: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Harej bot (talk | contribs)
m updating template parameters, Replaced: |status=}} → |status=|note=}},, Removed: reviewer=|, using AWB
Line 31: Line 31:
==Note to potential Good Article reviewers==
==Note to potential Good Article reviewers==
I nominated this article and unfortunately I will be away on business for two weeks. All going well I will return the weekend of 7 November. If you're looking to review this article, feel free to kick back until my return when I can give the review my full attention, cheers. --[[User:Roisterer|Roisterer]] ([[User talk:Roisterer|talk]]) 11:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I nominated this article and unfortunately I will be away on business for two weeks. All going well I will return the weekend of 7 November. If you're looking to review this article, feel free to kick back until my return when I can give the review my full attention, cheers. --[[User:Roisterer|Roisterer]] ([[User talk:Roisterer|talk]]) 11:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
: I'm back so let the reviewing begin! --[[User:Roisterer|Roisterer]] ([[User talk:Roisterer|talk]]) 09:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:13, 9 November 2009

WikiProject iconBiography B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAustralien: Australian rules football B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconLaurie Nash is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australien and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as High-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconCricket B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
Article assessment
Verifiability
Cleanup
Infoboxes
Cricket people
Cricket teams & countries
Images
On this day in cricket
Umpires
Women
Update
Other

Undue weight on bowling average

He played in two Tests, and one of them was a dreadful sticky, in which he took 5/22, which was on a par with South Africa's 20/81. This is skewing his stats (apart from the fact we don't know if he could have sustained the 5/104 odd for any lenght of time either) and I think maybe the stat shouldn't be in the lead because it can be misleading. It would be similar to saying that Harvey has a 100% win rate as captain, he only played in one Test. YellowMonkey (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 03:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for feedback; have omitted it from lead. --Roisterer (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good luck :) The scorecard refs looks a bit unwell. Also can you use another ref apart from Stats.Rleague.com? As it isn't considered entirely reliable. Aaroncrick (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
By whom and why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.98.97 (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll try to make the scorecard refs healthier. Not sure about an alternative to stas.rleague but I'll see what I can dig up. Cheers. --Roisterer (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note to potential Good Article reviewers

I nominated this article and unfortunately I will be away on business for two weeks. All going well I will return the weekend of 7 November. If you're looking to review this article, feel free to kick back until my return when I can give the review my full attention, cheers. --Roisterer (talk) 11:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back so let the reviewing begin! --Roisterer (talk) 09:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]