Jump to content

Raising Arizona: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reverted last two edits. Plot was fine how it was. Rotten Tomatoes contains old reviews and newer ones so stating it's rating does not state much.
Undid revision 328416669 by Andrzejbanas (talk) Nope, wording was awkward. Fixed it again.
Line 36: Line 36:
Gale and Evelle rob the bank but forget to take Junior in the car on their getaway and find that one of the bank's anti-theft [[dye pack|dye canisters]] explodes in their loot sack, disabling the car and incapacitating them. At the bank, Smalls arrives for Junior just ahead of Ed and Hi. Ed grabs the baby and flees; Hi is able to fends Smalls off until he finds himself at Smalls mercy. After throwing Hi to the ground, Hi holds up his hand to reveal that he has pulled the pin from one of the [[hand grenades]] on Smalls' vest. Smalls struggles but is blown to pieces by the grenade.
Gale and Evelle rob the bank but forget to take Junior in the car on their getaway and find that one of the bank's anti-theft [[dye pack|dye canisters]] explodes in their loot sack, disabling the car and incapacitating them. At the bank, Smalls arrives for Junior just ahead of Ed and Hi. Ed grabs the baby and flees; Hi is able to fends Smalls off until he finds himself at Smalls mercy. After throwing Hi to the ground, Hi holds up his hand to reveal that he has pulled the pin from one of the [[hand grenades]] on Smalls' vest. Smalls struggles but is blown to pieces by the grenade.


Hi and Ed sneak Junior back into his real home and are confronted by Nathan Sr. After Nathan Sr. learns why they took his son, he understands the couples predicament and counsels the young couple. When Hi and Ed say that they are breaking up, he advises them to sleep on it. Hi and Ed go to sleep in the same bed, and Hi has a dream about Gale and Evelle returning to prison; Glen gets his due from a Polish-American police officer after "telling one [[Polack]] joke too many"; and Nathan Jr. gets a football for Christmas, from someone other than his family and later becomes a football star. The dream then show an elderly couple together enjoying holiday visits from a large family of children and grandchildren.
Hi and Ed sneak Junior back into his real home and are confronted by Nathan Sr. After Nathan Sr. learns why they took his son, he understands the couples predicament and counsels the young couple. When Hi and Ed say that they are breaking up, he advises them to sleep on it. Hi and Ed go to sleep in the same bed, and Hi has a dream about Gale and Evelle returning to prison; Glen gets his due from a Polish-American police officer after "telling one [[Polack]] joke too many"; and Nathan Jr. gets a football for Christmas from "a kindly couple who wish to remain anonymous", later becoming a football star. The dream ends by depicting an elderly couple together enjoying a holiday visit from a large family of children and grandchildren.
<!-- before adding/removing information to the plot. Please refer to WP:FILMPLOT -->


==Cast==
==Cast==
Line 75: Line 74:
Negative reviews focused on "style over substance" stand against the film. ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote that "While [''Raising Arizona''] is filled with many splendid touches and plenty of yocks, it often doesn't hold together as a coherent story."<ref name="variety">{{cite web | title=Raising Arizona Review | url=http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117794309.html?categoryid=31&cs=1 | work=[[Variety (magzine)|Variety]] | date=1987 | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> Writing for ''[[The New Times]]'', Vincent Canby wrote that "Like "Blood Simple," it's full of technical expertise but has no life of its own... The direction is without decisive style."<ref name="NYTimes">{{cite journal |year=1987 |month=March |day=11|journal=[[The New Times]] |pages=C24 |accessdate=2009-06-04 |quote=Like "Blood Simple," it's full of technical expertise but has no life of its own... The direction is without decisive style.)}}</ref> Julie Salamon of the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' wrote that the Coen Brothers "have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery" but "By the end, the fun feels a little forced".<ref>{{cite journal |year=1987 |month=March |day=26|journal=[[Wall Street Journal]]|accessdate=2009-06-04 |quote=These fraternal film makers have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery... But sometimes they seem to be getting too big a kick out of their own shenanigans. By the end, the fun feels a little forced.)}}</ref> Dave Kehr of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' wrote that "the overlooked form peels away from the slight, frail content, and the film starts to look like an episode of "[[Hee Haw]]" directed by an amphetamine-crazed [[Orson Welles]]".<ref name="ChicagoTribune">{{cite journal |year=1987 |month=March |day=20|journal=[[The Chicago Tribune]]|accessdate=2009-06-04 |quote=Quickly and fatally, the overlooked form peels away from the slight, frail content, and the film starts to look like an episode of "Hee Haw" directed by an amphetamine-crazed Orson Welles.)}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] wrote a negative review stating the film "stretches out every moment for more than it's worth, until even the moments of inspiration seem forced. Since the basic idea of the movie is a good one and there are talented people in the cast, what we have here is a film shot down by its own forced and mannered style."<ref name="ebert">{{cite web | title=Raising Arizona Review | url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19870320/REVIEWS/703200302/1023 | work=[[Chicago Sun Times]] | date=1987 | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref>
Negative reviews focused on "style over substance" stand against the film. ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote that "While [''Raising Arizona''] is filled with many splendid touches and plenty of yocks, it often doesn't hold together as a coherent story."<ref name="variety">{{cite web | title=Raising Arizona Review | url=http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117794309.html?categoryid=31&cs=1 | work=[[Variety (magzine)|Variety]] | date=1987 | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> Writing for ''[[The New Times]]'', Vincent Canby wrote that "Like "Blood Simple," it's full of technical expertise but has no life of its own... The direction is without decisive style."<ref name="NYTimes">{{cite journal |year=1987 |month=March |day=11|journal=[[The New Times]] |pages=C24 |accessdate=2009-06-04 |quote=Like "Blood Simple," it's full of technical expertise but has no life of its own... The direction is without decisive style.)}}</ref> Julie Salamon of the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' wrote that the Coen Brothers "have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery" but "By the end, the fun feels a little forced".<ref>{{cite journal |year=1987 |month=March |day=26|journal=[[Wall Street Journal]]|accessdate=2009-06-04 |quote=These fraternal film makers have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery... But sometimes they seem to be getting too big a kick out of their own shenanigans. By the end, the fun feels a little forced.)}}</ref> Dave Kehr of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' wrote that "the overlooked form peels away from the slight, frail content, and the film starts to look like an episode of "[[Hee Haw]]" directed by an amphetamine-crazed [[Orson Welles]]".<ref name="ChicagoTribune">{{cite journal |year=1987 |month=March |day=20|journal=[[The Chicago Tribune]]|accessdate=2009-06-04 |quote=Quickly and fatally, the overlooked form peels away from the slight, frail content, and the film starts to look like an episode of "Hee Haw" directed by an amphetamine-crazed Orson Welles.)}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] wrote a negative review stating the film "stretches out every moment for more than it's worth, until even the moments of inspiration seem forced. Since the basic idea of the movie is a good one and there are talented people in the cast, what we have here is a film shot down by its own forced and mannered style."<ref name="ebert">{{cite web | title=Raising Arizona Review | url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19870320/REVIEWS/703200302/1023 | work=[[Chicago Sun Times]] | date=1987 | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref>


Modern reception to the film has been more generally positive. Both the British film magazine ''[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]]'' and film database [[Allmovie]] gave the film five stars, their highest ratings.<ref name="allmovie">{{cite web | title=Raising Arizona > Review | url=http://allmovie.com/work/raising-arizona-40176/review | work=[[Allmovie]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref><ref name="empire">{{cite web | title=Empire Reviews Central | url=http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?DVDID=7118 | work=[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> Allmovie's Lucia Bozzola wrote that "Complete with carefully modulated over-the-top performances from the entire cast, Raising Arizona confirmed the Coens' place among the most distinctive filmmakers to emerge from the 1980s independent cinema. " while Caroline Westbrook of ''Empire'' declared it a "Hilarious, madcap comedy from the Coen brothers that demonstrates just why they are the kings of quirk".<ref name="empire" /> The Dutch magazine ''[[Vrij Nederland]]'' placed ''Raising Arizona'''s bank robbery scene second, on their list of "The 5 best bank robberies in film history", behind a bank robbery scene from the 1995 thriller ''[[Heat (1995 film)|Heat]]''.<ref>{{cite news|title=The 5 Best Bank Robberies in Film History|work=[[Vrij Nederland]]|author=Porcelijn, Max|date=2008-04-26|pages=96-97}}</ref> In 2000, the [[American Film Institute]] had the film nominated for their list of one hundred best comedy films of the twentieth century, nominated by film directors, screenwriters, actors, editors, cinematographers, critics, historians and film executives.<ref>{{cite web | title=AFI's 100 Years...100 Laughs| url=http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/laughs.aspx | work=[[American Film Institute]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> The film placed at number thirty-one on the list.<ref>{{cite web | title=America's Funniest Movies| url=http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/laughs100.pdf?docID=252 | work=[[American Film Institute]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref>
Modern reception to the film has been more generally positive. Both the British film magazine ''[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]]'' and film database [[Allmovie]] gave the film five stars, their highest ratings.<ref name="allmovie">{{cite web | title=Raising Arizona > Review | url=http://allmovie.com/work/raising-arizona-40176/review | work=[[Allmovie]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref><ref name="empire">{{cite web | title=Empire Reviews Central | url=http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?DVDID=7118 | work=[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> Allmovie's Lucia Bozzola wrote that "Complete with carefully modulated over-the-top performances from the entire cast, Raising Arizona confirmed the Coens' place among the most distinctive filmmakers to emerge from the 1980s independent cinema. " while Caroline Westbrook of ''Empire'' declared it a "Hilarious, madcap comedy from the Coen brothers that demonstrates just why they are the kings of quirk".<ref name="empire" /> The Dutch magazine ''[[Vrij Nederland]]'' placed ''Raising Arizona'''s bank robbery scene second, on their list of "The 5 best bank robberies in film history", behind a bank robbery scene from the 1995 thriller ''[[Heat (1995 film)|Heat]]''.<ref>{{cite news|title=The 5 Best Bank Robberies in Film History|work=[[Vrij Nederland]]|author=Porcelijn, Max|date=2008-04-26|pages=96-97}}</ref> In 2000, the [[American Film Institute]] had the film nominated for their list of one hundred best comedy films of the twentieth century, nominated by film directors, screenwriters, actors, editors, cinematographers, critics, historians and film executives.<ref>{{cite web | title=AFI's 100 Years...100 Laughs| url=http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/laughs.aspx | work=[[American Film Institute]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> The film placed at number thirty-one on the list.<ref>{{cite web | title=America's Funniest Movies| url=http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/laughs100.pdf?docID=252 | work=[[American Film Institute]] | accessdate=2009-06-04}}</ref> The film currently has a 89% rating on [[Rotten Tomatoes]].


The film was screened out of competition at the [[1987 Cannes Film Festival]].<ref name="festival-cannes.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/434/year/1987.html |title=Festival de Cannes: Raising Arizona |accessdate=2009-07-25|work=festival-cannes.com}}</ref>
The film was screened out of competition at the [[1987 Cannes Film Festival]].<ref name="festival-cannes.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/434/year/1987.html |title=Festival de Cannes: Raising Arizona |accessdate=2009-07-25|work=festival-cannes.com}}</ref>

Revision as of 02:17, 30 November 2009

Raising Arizona
Theatrical release poster
Directed byEthan Coen
Joel Coen
Written byJoel Coen
Ethan Coen
Produced byEthan Coen
Joel Coen
StarringNicolas Cage
Holly Hunter
William Forsythe
John Goodman
Frances McDormand
Sam McMurray
Randall "Tex" Cobb
Narrated byNicolas Cage
CinematographyBarry Sonnenfeld
Edited byMichael R. Miller
Music byCarter Burwell
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release date
March 6, 1987
Running time
94 minutes
LandTemplate:FilmUS
SpracheEnglisch
Budget$6,000,000
Box office$22,800,000

Raising Arizona is a 1987 Coen Brothers comedy film starring Nicolas Cage, Holly Hunter, William Forsythe, John Goodman, Frances McDormand and Randall "Tex" Cobb. Not a blockbuster at the time of its release, it has since achieved the status of a cult film. Typical Coen Brothers fare, the movie is replete with symbolism, visual gags, yodeling folk music, unconventional characters, flamboyant camera work, pathos and idiosyncratic dialogue. The movie ranked number 31 on the American Film Institute's 100 Years... 100 Laughs and number 45 on Bravo's "100 Funniest Movies."

Plot

Criminal Herbert I. "Hi" McDunnough (Nicolas Cage) and policewoman Edwina "Ed" (Holly Hunter) meet after she takes the mugshots of the recidivist. With continued visits, Hi learns of Ed's fiancé has left her. Hi proposes to her after his latest release from prison and the two get married. They move into a desert mobile home, and Hi gets a job in a machine shop. Ed discovers that she is infertile and find they are unable to adopt due to Hi's criminal record. The couple learns of the "Arizona Quints," sons of locally-famous furniture magnate Nathan Arizona (Trey Wilson); Hi and Ed kidnap one of the five babies, whom they believe to be Nathan Junior.

Hi and Ed return home and are soon visited by Hi's prison buddies, Gale and Evelle Snoats (John Goodman, William Forsythe), who have just broken out. Under the brothers' influence, Hi is tempted to revert to his felonious ways. Their problems get worse when Hi's supervisor, Glen (Sam McMurray), proposes wife swapping which results in Hi assaulting him. That night, Hi decides to steal a package of diapers for the baby and goes on the run from the entire local neighborhood, the police, the gun-toting store cashier, and a pack of dogs. Ed finally relents and picks him up, leading to a tense ride home.

At the McDunnough residence the next day, Glen approaches Hi to fire him and reveal that he has deduced "Junior's" identity. Gale and Evelle overhear this conversation and turn on Hi, tying him up and taking Junior for themselves. Gale and Evelle leave with plans to rob a "hayseed" bank with Junior in tow. When Ed comes home, she frees Hi and the two arm themselves and set out to retrieve their child together. En route, Ed suggests that they should end their marriage after recovering the boy. Nathan Arizona Sr. is approached by the bounty hunter Leonard Smalls (Randall "Tex" Cobb) who offers to find the child. Nathan Sr. refuses to partake of Smalls' services. Smalls decides to recover the child anyway to sell on the black market. He begins tracking Gale and Evelle and learns of their bank robbery plans.

Gale and Evelle rob the bank but forget to take Junior in the car on their getaway and find that one of the bank's anti-theft dye canisters explodes in their loot sack, disabling the car and incapacitating them. At the bank, Smalls arrives for Junior just ahead of Ed and Hi. Ed grabs the baby and flees; Hi is able to fends Smalls off until he finds himself at Smalls mercy. After throwing Hi to the ground, Hi holds up his hand to reveal that he has pulled the pin from one of the hand grenades on Smalls' vest. Smalls struggles but is blown to pieces by the grenade.

Hi and Ed sneak Junior back into his real home and are confronted by Nathan Sr. After Nathan Sr. learns why they took his son, he understands the couples predicament and counsels the young couple. When Hi and Ed say that they are breaking up, he advises them to sleep on it. Hi and Ed go to sleep in the same bed, and Hi has a dream about Gale and Evelle returning to prison; Glen gets his due from a Polish-American police officer after "telling one Polack joke too many"; and Nathan Jr. gets a football for Christmas from "a kindly couple who wish to remain anonymous", later becoming a football star. The dream ends by depicting an elderly couple together enjoying a holiday visit from a large family of children and grandchildren.

Cast

Production

Conception

The Coen Brothers started working on Raising Arizona with the idea to make it as different as possible from their previous film Blood Simple by having it be far more optimistic and upbeat.[1][2] The starting point of scriptwriting came from the idea of the character of Hi's who has the desire to live a regular life as well as having the desire to live outside the boundaries of the law.[3] To create their character's dialect, Joel and Ethan took a hybrid of local dialect and what the assumed reading material of the characters, namely magazines and The Bible.[4] The script took three and a half months to write.[5]

The film was influenced by director Preston Sturges and writers such as William Faulkner and the southern literature of Flannery O'Conner.[6][7][8] Joel and Ethan showed their completed script to Circle Films who was their American distributor for Blood Simple. Circle Films liked the script and agreed to finance the film.[9][10] The Coens came to set with a complete script and story board.[11] With the low budget of just a little more than five million dollars, Joel Coen noted that "to obtain maximum from that money, the movie has to be meticulously prepared".[12]

Cast

Opposed to Blood Simple, the characters of Raising Arizona were written to be very sympathetic.[13] The Coens wrote the part of Ed for Holly Hunter.[11] Several babies had to be fired on set due to them taking their first steps rather than crawling. One mother put their baby's shoes on backwards to keep the baby crawling rather than walking.[14] The character of Leonard Smalls was created when the Coen Brothers tried to envision an "evil character" not from their imagination, but what one that the character Hi would have thought up.[4] Randall "Tex" Cobb gave the Coens difficulty with on set, with Joel noting that "he's less an actor than a force of nature...I don't know if I'd rush headlong into employing him for a future film."[4]

Filming

Raising Arizona was shot in thirteen weeks.[2] Relationship between actor Nicolas Cage and the Coens was respectful but turbulent. Cage arrived on set offering suggestions to the Coen Brothers through various points in the film which the Coens ignored.[14] Cage said that "Joel and Ethan have a very strong vision and I've learned how difficult it is to accept another artist's vision. They have an autocratic nature."[15]

Many crew members who had worked with Joel and Ethan on Blood Simple returned for Raising Arizona, including cinematographer Barry Sonnenfeld, co-producer Mark Silverman, production designer Jane Musky, associate producer and assistant director Deborah Reinisch, and film composer Carter Burwell.[9][16]

Reception

Initial critical reception opened to very mixed reviews. Among the positive reviews, David Denby of New York, wrote that the film was a "deranged fable of the New West" which turned "sarcasm into a rude yet affectionate mode of comedy".[17] Richard Corliss of Time referred to the film as "exuberantly original".[17] Rita Kempley of The Washington Post a positive review stating that that it was "the best kidnapping comedy since last summer's "Ruthless People".[18] On the film review television show Siskel & Ebert & the Movies, critic Gene Siskel commented that the film was as "good looking as it is funny" and that "despite some slow patches" he recommended the film giving it a "thumbs up".[19] Writing for The New Yorker, Pauline Kael wrote that "Raising Arizona is no big deal, but it has a rambunctious charm."[20]

Negative reviews focused on "style over substance" stand against the film. Variety wrote that "While [Raising Arizona] is filled with many splendid touches and plenty of yocks, it often doesn't hold together as a coherent story."[21] Writing for The New Times, Vincent Canby wrote that "Like "Blood Simple," it's full of technical expertise but has no life of its own... The direction is without decisive style."[22] Julie Salamon of the Wall Street Journal wrote that the Coen Brothers "have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery" but "By the end, the fun feels a little forced".[23] Dave Kehr of the Chicago Tribune wrote that "the overlooked form peels away from the slight, frail content, and the film starts to look like an episode of "Hee Haw" directed by an amphetamine-crazed Orson Welles".[24] Roger Ebert wrote a negative review stating the film "stretches out every moment for more than it's worth, until even the moments of inspiration seem forced. Since the basic idea of the movie is a good one and there are talented people in the cast, what we have here is a film shot down by its own forced and mannered style."[25]

Modern reception to the film has been more generally positive. Both the British film magazine Empire and film database Allmovie gave the film five stars, their highest ratings.[26][27] Allmovie's Lucia Bozzola wrote that "Complete with carefully modulated over-the-top performances from the entire cast, Raising Arizona confirmed the Coens' place among the most distinctive filmmakers to emerge from the 1980s independent cinema. " while Caroline Westbrook of Empire declared it a "Hilarious, madcap comedy from the Coen brothers that demonstrates just why they are the kings of quirk".[27] The Dutch magazine Vrij Nederland placed Raising Arizona's bank robbery scene second, on their list of "The 5 best bank robberies in film history", behind a bank robbery scene from the 1995 thriller Heat.[28] In 2000, the American Film Institute had the film nominated for their list of one hundred best comedy films of the twentieth century, nominated by film directors, screenwriters, actors, editors, cinematographers, critics, historians and film executives.[29] The film placed at number thirty-one on the list.[30] The film currently has a 89% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

The film was screened out of competition at the 1987 Cannes Film Festival.[31]

Soundtrack

Untitled

The score to Raising Arizona is written by Carter Burwell, the second of his collaborations with the Coen Brothers.

The sounds are a mix of organ, massed choir, banjo, whistling and yodeling.

Themes are borrowed from the "Goofing Off Suite", originally recorded by Pete Seeger in 1955, which includes an excerpt from the "Chorale" movement of Ludwig van Beethoven's "Symphony No. 9" and "Russian Folk Themes and Yodel". Musicians credited with playing the music for the film are Ben Freed on banjo, Mieczyslaw Litwinski on Jew's harp and guitar and yodeling by John R. Crowder.

Selections from Burwell's score to Raising Arizona were released on an album in 1987, along with selections from the Coen's previous (and first) feature film, Blood Simple.

Track listing

  1. "Introduction - A Hole in the Ground" – (0:38)
  2. "Way Out There (Main Title)" – (1:55)
  3. "He Was Horrible" – (1:30)
  4. "Just Business" – (1:17)
  5. "The Letter" – (2:27)
  6. "Hail Lenny" – (2:18)
  7. "Raising Ukeleles" – (3:41)
  8. "Dream of the Future" – (2:31)
  9. "Shopping Arizona" – (2:46)
  10. "Return to the Nursery" – (1:35)
    • The tracks from Raising Arizona comprise the first ten tracks on a 17-track CD that also features selections from the Blood Simple soundtrack.

References

  1. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 17.
  2. ^ a b Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 18.
  3. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 27.
  4. ^ a b c Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 29. Cite error: The named reference "CoenInterviews29" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 30
  6. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 23.
  7. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 24.
  8. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 26.
  9. ^ a b Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 33
  10. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 34.
  11. ^ a b Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 21.
  12. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 28.
  13. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 32.
  14. ^ a b Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 19 Cite error: The named reference "CoenInterviews19" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  15. ^ Coen, Coen, Allen 2006, pp. 20.
  16. ^ Russell 2001, pp. 27
  17. ^ a b Russell 2001, pp. 44
  18. ^ Kempley, Rita (March 20, 1987). "'Raising Arizona' (PG-13)". Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  19. ^ "At the Movies: Raising Arizona". At the Movies. ABC Domestic Television. 1987. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  20. ^ The New Yorker: 81. 1987. Raising Arizona is no big deal, but it has a rambunctious charm. The sunsets look marvelously ultra-vivid, the pain doesn't seem to be dry – it's like opening day of a miniature golf course.) {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  21. ^ "Raising Arizona Review". Variety. 1987. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  22. ^ The New Times: C24. 1987. Like "Blood Simple," it's full of technical expertise but has no life of its own... The direction is without decisive style.) {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  23. ^ Wall Street Journal. 1987. These fraternal film makers have a lot of imagination and sense of fun - and, most of all, a terrific sense of how to manipulate imagery... But sometimes they seem to be getting too big a kick out of their own shenanigans. By the end, the fun feels a little forced.) {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  24. ^ The Chicago Tribune. 1987. Quickly and fatally, the overlooked form peels away from the slight, frail content, and the film starts to look like an episode of "Hee Haw" directed by an amphetamine-crazed Orson Welles.) {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  25. ^ "Raising Arizona Review". Chicago Sun Times. 1987. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  26. ^ "Raising Arizona > Review". Allmovie. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  27. ^ a b "Empire Reviews Central". Empire. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  28. ^ Porcelijn, Max (2008-04-26). "The 5 Best Bank Robberies in Film History". Vrij Nederland. pp. 96–97.
  29. ^ "AFI's 100 Years...100 Laughs". American Film Institute. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  30. ^ "America's Funniest Movies" (PDF). American Film Institute. Retrieved 2009-06-04.
  31. ^ "Festival de Cannes: Raising Arizona". festival-cannes.com. Retrieved 2009-07-25.

Bibliography