Talk:Horton Plains National Park: Difference between revisions
→Alt text: ready now? |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::Good, I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horton_Plains_National_Park&diff=330030819&oldid=330029214 tidied] it a bit to remove repetition (the name of the park is used far too often), and running sentences together to improve the flow. Please change back anything you don't like |
:::Good, I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horton_Plains_National_Park&diff=330030819&oldid=330029214 tidied] it a bit to remove repetition (the name of the park is used far too often), and running sentences together to improve the flow. Please change back anything you don't like |
||
::::Thanks Jim, It is all OK. Do you think now it is ready for nomination? --<font face="calibri">[[User:Chanakal|<font color="SteelBlue">'''Chanaka L'''</font>]] (<font color="Coral">[[User talk:Chanakal|talk]]</font>)</font> 09:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC) |
::::Thanks Jim, It is all OK. Do you think now it is ready for nomination? --<font face="calibri">[[User:Chanakal|<font color="SteelBlue">'''Chanaka L'''</font>]] (<font color="Coral">[[User talk:Chanakal|talk]]</font>)</font> 09:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::::I think so, it will probably be a while before it gets reviewed, so we can carry on refining the prose any way. A reviewer is bound to pick up on things we have missed any way. <font face="chiller"><font color="red"><b>[[User:Jimfbleak|Jimfbleak]] - </b></font></font><font face="arial"><font color="green">[[User talk:Jimfbleak| talk to me?]]</font></font> 11:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:23, 6 December 2009
Sri Lanka Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Protected areas Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Horton Plains National Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBC-48W251J-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8dc2b1b06e87a5e8d1638580ea57a545. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Alt text
I've added alt text and tweaked the article yet again. Do we know how many visitors the park gets annually? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- I am afraid, we don't have the number of annual visitors. Revenue-wise it is the second most earner after Yala. I was able to get the visitor information on Udawalawe though.--Chanaka L (talk) 08:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- I expanded the lead section to summarize the text.--Chanaka L (talk) 08:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Good, I've tidied it a bit to remove repetition (the name of the park is used far too often), and running sentences together to improve the flow. Please change back anything you don't like
- Thanks Jim, It is all OK. Do you think now it is ready for nomination? --Chanaka L (talk) 09:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- I think so, it will probably be a while before it gets reviewed, so we can carry on refining the prose any way. A reviewer is bound to pick up on things we have missed any way. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Jim, It is all OK. Do you think now it is ready for nomination? --Chanaka L (talk) 09:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Good, I've tidied it a bit to remove repetition (the name of the park is used far too often), and running sentences together to improve the flow. Please change back anything you don't like
- I expanded the lead section to summarize the text.--Chanaka L (talk) 08:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Start-Class Sri Lanka articles
- Unknown-importance Sri Lanka articles
- WikiProject Sri Lanka articles
- Unassessed Protected areas articles
- Unknown-importance Protected areas articles
- Articles of WikiProject Protected areas
- C-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles