Wikipedia:WikiProject Death/Assessment

Main page

Assessment

Templates

Kategorien

Ressourcen

Participants

Suicide task force

Death articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top Hoch Mid Niedrig NA ??? Total FA 2 8 29 64 103 FL 1 3 9 13 A 1 1 GA 3 23 59 207 292 B 15 102 336 1,157 7 1,617 C 18 131 660 3,716 16 4,541 Start 7 80 786 7,672 32 8,577 Stub 1 44 1,428 7 1,480 List 6 37 238 1,436 2 1,719 Kategorie 28,884 28,884 Disambig 101 101 File 141 141 Portal 1 1 Project 52 52 Template 173 173 NA 1 2 20 1,363 1,386 Other 1 41 42 Assessed 51 384 2,158 15,710 30,756 64 49,123 Unassessed 13 2 15 Total 51 384 2,158 15,723 30,756 66 49,138 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 75,365 Ω = 4.54 UNDER CONSTRCUTION***** The assessment department of the Death WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's death articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Death}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Death articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. FAQ See also the general assessment FAQ and the project's B-Class assessment & criteria FAQ and A-Class review & criteria FAQ. 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add {{WikiProject Death}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a {{WikProject Death}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the Death WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? The review department can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for peer review there. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What about lists? Lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards featured list rather than featured article status. Assessment instructions An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Death}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax): {{WikiProject Death| ... | class=??? | ...}} The following values may be used: FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Death articles) A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Death articles) GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Death articles) B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Death articles) Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Death articles) Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Death articles) Dab (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Death disambiguation pages) Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Death articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below. Quality scale Log full log of assessment changes Class Criteria Formal process Example FA Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received articles|featured article status after community review. Featured article candidates A Wikipedia:WikiProject Death/Assessment/A-Class Death A-Class review GA Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status. Good article nominations B The article meets the following five criteria: Wikipedia:WikiProject Death/Assessment/B-Class May be assigned by any reviewer