Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikemc87: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by Timotheus Canens (talk) to last version by Bsadowski1 |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> |
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> |
||
I have a whole bucket of SPAs fresh from the oven. [[User:BigHappyHarry|BigHappyHarry]] ([[User talk:BigHappyHarry|talk]]) 22:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) |
I have a whole bucket of SPAs fresh from the oven. [[User:BigHappyHarry|BigHappyHarry]] ([[User talk:BigHappyHarry|talk]]) 22:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Yours? Or someone elses? You left this open ended. '''[[User:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Sy</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">n</font>]] 19:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
||
Revision as of 19:15, 15 January 2010
Mikemc87
- Mikemc87 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date January 14 2010, 22:54 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Mikemc87 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fortunes4 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Filmcom (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by BigHappyHarry
I have a whole bucket of SPAs fresh from the oven. BigHappyHarry (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yours? Or someone elses? You left this open ended. Syn 19:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
The complaint here would be of !vote-stacking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Goode and that looks quite plausible. (It would help to be explicit about the abuse complained of at SPI.) However, Filmcom (talk · contribs) is hardly an SPA having been contributing for some four years now.
It is curious that complainant BigHappyHarry (talk · contribs) has been contributing for just one day and this case is apparently his second ever contribution. Something to be explained here? Rhomb (talk) 07:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed, and it's also suspicious that he knows the speedy deletion template as well. --Bsadowski1 07:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
- Current status –
Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by BigHappyHarry (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
