Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 January 20: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:58, 21 January 2010

< January 19	January 21 >

January 20

File:24590.jpg

Image does not appear relevant to an article and in OR and unused since 2007. Is of low quality and does not add EV Calmer Waters 10:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It could possibly be de-orphaned and used in Enchilada but I think it is too low quality. Also, it is possibly an unfree file: see this page. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007-07-21-11279.jpg

Image does not appear relevant to an article and in OR and unused since 2007. Is of low quality and does not add EV Calmer Waters 09:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. (Question: how do you tell whether a currently orphaned image has been used in the past? I've never known how to do that.) Jheald (talk) 10:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DannyMangold2009.jpg

File:DannyMangold2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JazzCarnival (notify | contribs).

Subject of this non-free image is active in the music business. Was tagged for semi-speedy deletion, uploader untagged and added a note that the artist isn't currently touring. That doesn't seem to be enough to make this non-replaceable. Fails to meet WP:NFCC#1 I am sure. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Angus. Jheald (talk) 10:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laurell-headshot.jpg

File:Laurell-headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tokyogirl79 (notify | contribs).

Was tagged for semi-speedy deletion (non-free image of a living person: WP:NFC#UULP). Uploader untagged with edit summary "not only does this show the author, but since there are multiple accusations that LKH looks like her character Anita Blake, it is important to keep it attached to the article". Doesn't seem like that this would meet WP:NFCC#1. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I might add that it shouldn't be that hard to get a clear photo of Ms. Hamilton, she makes book signing appearances from time to time. Crypticfirefly (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject is alive; the image is replaceable. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerome Elston Scott.JPG

File:Jerome Elston Scott.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Extracare4u (notify | contribs).

OR, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as duplicate (though of the two it may have the more preferable file name). Whatever the image is, it's certainly not LQ. Please think about the alphabet soup first, Fastily, before you slap it on. Anyhow, the image is a duplicate of File:JeromeHeadshot222.JPG uploaded by the same user, and is used on Jerome Elston Scott. Both copies have EXIF data. Jheald (talk) 10:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't WP:NFCC#1 exist any more? Delete this and File:JeromeHeadshot222.JPG as well. Non-free images of living people, particularly the sort of people who have official publicity pics, are replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the image has been uploaded as free, all rights released, not fair-use. Jheald (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikorta church.JPG

File:Ikorta church.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kober (notify | contribs).

Non-free photograph of a medieval building in Georgia. Was speedy-tagged as being obviously replaceable. De-tagged by a fellow administrator (User:Fastily) with the argument that since Georgia has no "Freedom of Panorama" all images would be non-free anyway, on the mistaken assumption that the law would restrict photographs even of old non-copyrighted objects. This is obviously wrong: since the building isn't copyrighted, FoP or lack of FoP never comes into play here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per FPAS. Fastily going bonkers again. Clear fail of NFCC #1. Jheald (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@ Jheald. Could you at least try to lay off the snotty comments for once? Or is that so difficult for you to do? I don't believe this is the first time I've told you this. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Please see the related discussion which led to this discussion at [1]. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that FPAS has taken the liberty of changing The commons page that I refer to (see Commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Former Soviet Union), making my keep of File:Ikorta church.JPG unwarranted. Please see WP:CSD#F3. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metallicar-Supernatural.jpg

Non-free image of a black 1967 Chevrolet Impala. Not evident how this meets WP:NFCC#1 as it is readily replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't need to see a picture of this particular prop car when the same info can be conveyed by a textual description and a link to the article about the car model (of which free images can presumably exist). It's described as a stock model in the text, so there isn't even anything special about this particular car that would need illustration. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meyerhoffer surfboards.jpg

Not clear that this image meets WP:NFCC#1, human subject is alive, the surfboards exist. Could be replaced by one or more free images. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously replaceable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Microfueler.jpg

Doesn't add much to the E-Fuel MicroFueler ~~advert~~article. Unlikely to meet WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, easily replaceable by anyone with access to one of these microfuelers. Nyttend (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miessence Product Range.jpg

This non-free image adds nothing much to the Miessence article and doesn't meet WP:NFCC#8 I think. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miev motor.jpg

Seems likely that this non-free image could be replaced by a more informative free content diagram/drawing. Not at all obvious that WP:NFCC#1 is met here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikhail Suslov.jpg

The article on Suslov is well illustrated with possibly-free and maybe-free images, so that it's not obvious that this non-free one from late in his life is adding much to the reader's understanding, as required by WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitney Young Birthplace.jpg

While there are no copyright problems, this is quite LQ, and it's been superseded by File:Whitney M. Young, Jr. Birthplace.jpg and is accordingly orphaned. Nyttend (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MitsubishiSpaceLiner.jpg

Not obvious to me that this non-free image adds significantly to the reader's understanding of the Mitsubishi Grandis, a production vehicle based to some degree on this concept car. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitsubishi ssu.gif

Non-free image used in the Mitsubishi Endeavor article, but not obvious this adds significantly to the reader's understanding of this subject as required by WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admiraljames-norrington.jpg

Violates NFCC#8. Ryan4314 (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to add nothing significant, given the non-free portrait image already used in the infobox. Jheald (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Methyl-chloroformate-2D-skeletal.png

LQ, OR, OB (see File:Methyl chloroformate.png. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons (Category:Chloroformate esters). It's not LQ, it's a SVG for goodness sakes! As to whether it's obsoleted by the other image, I would say no -- this one represents a different (but nevertheless widespread) convention, showing the carbon bond skeleton for hydrocarbon parts of the molecule, rather than depicting all the hydrogen and all the carbon atoms. Jheald (talk) 00:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The other one appears wrong, since it has a "CH3" plugged on the end, and that should not exist on such a skeletal diagram. 70.29.211.138 (talk) 05:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woodward pic of woodward.png

I strongly doubt uploader is the copyright holder as claimed Infrogmation (talk) 23:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re-tag? The image would appear to qualify for {{PD-art-life-70}} and probably also {{PD-US}} (before 1923?). Uploader is new here, and may just have thought it was his scanning that needed a declaration of copyright status. Jheald (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 *LQ, OR, OB (see [[:File:Methyl chloroformate.png]]. -'''[[User:Fastily|<span style='font-family: "Trebuchet MS"; color:#4B0082'><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small>]]''' <sup><small>[[User talk:Fastily|<font color="#4B0082">(T<small>ALK</small>)</font>]]</small></sup></span> 23:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Move to Commons''' (Category:Chloroformate esters).  It's not LQ, it's a SVG for goodness sakes!  As to whether it's obsoleted by the other image, I would say no -- this one represents a different (but nevertheless widespread) convention, showing the carbon bond skeleton for hydrocarbon parts of the molecule, rather than depicting all the hydrogen and all the carbon atoms.  [[User:Jheald|Jheald]] ([[User talk:Jheald|talk]]) 00:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' The other one appears wrong, since it has a "CH3" plugged on the end, and that should not exist on such a skeletal diagram. [[Special:Contributions/70.29.211.138|70.29.211.138]] ([[User talk:70.29.211.138|talk]]) 05:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 ====[[:File:Woodward pic of woodward.png]]====