Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flying Plovers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Benjamint444 (talk | contribs) |
→Flying Plover: support |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Support as nominator''', and this is the crap being swooped out of me ... I left quickly after taking these ;-) --[[user:benjamint444|Benjamint]] 13:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC) |
* '''Support as nominator''', and this is the crap being swooped out of me ... I left quickly after taking these ;-) --[[user:benjamint444|Benjamint]] 13:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' - They are both good, i'd go with the first. I think the image quality is negligibly different from what we would expect. Good shot! --<font face="Comic Sans MS">'''[[User:childzy|<font color="#000000">Chil</font><font color="#E3170D">dzy</font>]]''' ¤ '''[[User_talk:childzy|<font color="#000000">Ta</font><font color="#E3170D">lk</font>]]'''</font> 16:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
* |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
Revision as of 16:25, 2 March 2010
- Reason
- flying shots so mitigates the slightly lower IQ than usual (IMO), shows the wing spurs and facial mask well which are both destinguishing characteristics of these birds.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Masked Lapwing
- Creator
- Benjamint 13:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support as nominator, and this is the crap being swooped out of me ... I left quickly after taking these ;-) --Benjamint 13:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support - They are both good, i'd go with the first. I think the image quality is negligibly different from what we would expect. Good shot! --Childzy ¤ Talk 16:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)