Jump to content

Talk:James Abourezk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m template
ListasBot (talk | contribs)
Applied fixes to WPBiography template. Did I get it wrong?
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=Start|priority=|politician-work-group=yes|needs-infobox=yes|listas=Abourezk, James
{{WPBiography
|living=yes
|class=Start
|politician-work-group=yes
|needs-infobox=yes
|listas=Abourezk, James
}}
}}
{{WikiProject South Dakota|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject South Dakota|class=Start|importance=Mid}}

Revision as of 21:10, 27 March 2010

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
WikiProject iconSouth Dakota Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article is about one (or many) Person(s).
WikiProject iconPalestine C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Someone changed "of Lebanese descent" to "of Christian Lebanese descent". I reverted. Christianity is a religion, not an ethnicity. Would anyone say "of Muslim Egyptian descent", or "of Christian Canadian descent"? – Quadell (talk) (random) 02:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was me. In the case of the Middle East, yes, religion and ethnicity tend to go hand in hand. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. Korny O'Near 02:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase gets 58 hits. Compared to over 78,000 for just "Lebanese descent". Which is my point. It isn't a typical way to refer to someone, and it's confusing in that a person can change religions but not ethnicities. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How about "born to Christian Lebanese parents" then? That's another common phrasing. Korny O'Near 00:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. – Quadell (talk) (random) 00:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversies"

The article lists some of his political statements as "controversies", without explaining why they are controversial. Such opinions may very well be uncommon in the US Congress, but an opinion is not a controversy before it is widely protested and discussed. Sources for that must be found, or this should simply be filed under "Views on the Middle-East" or some other neutral heading (which may be preferable in any case). - O. A. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.250.33 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies

I've clearly sourced all of the controversial statements made by Mr. Abourezk. I believe that the context of these statements is very obvious.

I think the way I've arranged the controversy section (i.e. Chronologically) is more organized and less polemical than a recent edit.```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperionsteel (talkcontribs) 02:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]