Jump to content

Talk:Danube Delta: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Maelli (talk | contribs)
→‎English: new section
Maelli (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:
== English ==
== English ==


The whole article needs a good clean up of the English used! [[User:Maelli|Maelli]] ([[User talk:Maelli|talk]]) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
The whole article needs a good clean up of the English used, that's why there are bits we can't understand! [[User:Maelli|Maelli]] ([[User talk:Maelli|talk]]) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:15, 12 October 2010

WikiProject iconRomania Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rumänien-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article has a link to something called Chilia that it says somewhere on the mis-punctuated section of Wikipedia it should try chilia-, which I know is wrong because chilia- is an article on a numerical prefix, but the requested chilia is an article for a delta. Any comments?? 66.245.119.43 20:25, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Snake Island

About 44 km of the Danube Delta lies the Snake Island, a territory which belongs to Ukraine but claimed by Romania. I find this sentence hard to comprehend. What does 44 km refer to? /Habj 10:47, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

that should be about 44 off the coast of the Danube Delta. bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk 11:07, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

History

Pages [1] and [2] (and probably others) note a Herodotus' mention of the delta. Much more descriptive is [3]. We should use these sources, at least as an inspiration. It would be better to find out more reliable sources for these statements, of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miraceti (talkcontribs) 07:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Englisch

The whole article needs a good clean up of the English used, that's why there are bits we can't understand! Maelli (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]