Jump to content

Talk:Mary Bell: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Released because society as a whole made the decision
Rodhullandemu (talk | contribs)
Line 59: Line 59:


::::But someone is kept in prison because the various groups agree -- compositely -- that is best. So it isn't completely meaningful to say "she's changed", because some groups and opinions do not recognize that as important. More than likely, she was judged to be less of a risk than other individuals. That factor would certainly have contributed to her release. [[Special:Contributions/98.210.208.107|98.210.208.107]] ([[User talk:98.210.208.107|talk]]) 01:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
::::But someone is kept in prison because the various groups agree -- compositely -- that is best. So it isn't completely meaningful to say "she's changed", because some groups and opinions do not recognize that as important. More than likely, she was judged to be less of a risk than other individuals. That factor would certainly have contributed to her release. [[Special:Contributions/98.210.208.107|98.210.208.107]] ([[User talk:98.210.208.107|talk]]) 01:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
*Agree; in short, the Parole Board evaluated her case and concluded that she was no longer at risk of further offending. It's a sad case, and [[Gitta Sereny]]'s book makes the argument for that. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 01:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


==Uncorrected Vandalism==
==Uncorrected Vandalism==

Revision as of 01:15, 10 February 2011

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong Brian Howe?

I wikified Brian Howe, but it refers to the wrong one. ,,,,,How do I correct? --Sgeo | Talk 02:18, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)

Should the " Child Killers say the darnedest things:Mary Bell, 2 comics about the killings" link be deleted? It seems to me to be gratuitous and pointless? Albatross2147 13:15, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Missing details?

It appears that there are significant facts missing from this article. The article mentions Mary and her daughter being protected upon release from jail, yet there is no prior mention of a daughter. I think this needs to be looked at - I have no idea how to 'flag' an article, but in general it seems quite jumpy and is missing pieces, so it could do with a good lookover. Ktbaby 13:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree ktbaby. i myself came to the talk page after reading about her previously unmentioned daughter. where did she find the time in jail to have sex and get pregnant? maybe she was raped by a guard.. this missing information needs to be addressed. i might do it myself later if i have the time Lue3378 17:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age in picture

If Mary Bell was ten at the time of the murders according to the article summary, how can the main picture also be of her at the time of the murders if the picture is described as her at eleven years of age?

The picture appears on CrimeLibrary [1], where it says she's 10 in that picture. I'll fix that. grendel|khan 13:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now the picture says "age 10, at the time of the murders" and the article summary says she was age 11 at the time of the murders. Which is it? 68.255.60.58 22:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Use of Description "Serial Killer"

Based on the definition of serial killer on Wikipedia, Mary Bell does not merit inclusion in that category of murderer.

That article defines a serial killer as "someone who commits three or more murders over an extended period of time with cooling-off periods in between. In between their crimes, they appear to be quite normal, a state which Hervey Cleckley and Robert Hare call the 'mask of sanity.' There is often — but not always — a sexual element to the murders." (My emphasis.)

Mary was convicted of two murders, which does not meet the definition. Therefore, I suggest she be removed from the serial killer category. Marklemagne 05:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where is she now?

Where is Mary Bell now? The article notes that the press found her under her assumed name. What is her assumed name? Where is she?

The whole point of the assumed name is that no one knows where she is. 206.165.150.70 (talk) 09:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How did she have a daughter?

She was 10 and 11 at the time of the murders and imprisonment and 23 or so at the time of her release. How did she have a daughter? Are prisoners in Britain allowed releases to have sex?

No, but they're traditionally allowed to have sex after they're released. She left prison in 1980, and her daughter was born in 1984. 82.39.211.80 02:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was she released?

Why was she released from prison after such a short time? She was diagnosed as a psychopath at trial; why would someone that dangerous be put back on the street?

She was imprisoned at the age of 11 and released at the age of 23. I think it is fairly reasonable to assume that she changed significantly in that period.
And she hasn't done anything in the 40 years since then, so clearly it was the right choice. Besides, with the childhood she had, how can you not be screwed up a little? 67.106.115.42 (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article is also lacking that her imprisonment had a significant impact on her. Can we assume that TruTV (formerly Court TV) has sufficient enough editorial oversight to be a trustworthy link?


http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/famous/bell/incar_9.html
--208.255.118.242 (talk) 17:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Something most people aren't actively aware of is that there are several reasons for keeping someone in prison. People tend to gravitate towards a few (or one) of them. And tend to not be aware of, or not recognize the legitimacy of other reasons.
(Reasons for incarceration include: a) Rehabilitation, b) Public safety, c) Punishment, d) Deterrent to others, e) Restitution for loss to society, f) Eye-for-an-eye vengeance.)
But someone is kept in prison because the various groups agree -- compositely -- that is best. So it isn't completely meaningful to say "she's changed", because some groups and opinions do not recognize that as important. More than likely, she was judged to be less of a risk than other individuals. That factor would certainly have contributed to her release. 98.210.208.107 (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uncorrected Vandalism

There appears to have been some vandalism on this page that was never corrected some time back. There used to be a paragraph on her Early Life that was removed and never replaced. See the edit here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mary_Bell&diff=prev&oldid=113255185

Murder/Manslaughter

The first section of the article implies that Bell was convicted of the 'murder' of the two victims; however, the article later states that she was found not guilty of murder, but of manslaughter.

It is therefore more correct to state that the boys were 'killed' not 'murdered'. Will edit to reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.65.166 (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had she started puberty at time of killing?

Had she started puberty at the time of the killing? Had her hormones got her angry about her life upto that point in time and to relieve the anger, she desired to mistreat someone weaker than herself? 217.42.58.201 (talk) 02:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, she started puberty while incarcerated. (See Cries Unheard) --Auric (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate

Someone vandalized her birthdate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.107.159 (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible writing

Makes no sense! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.199.172.236 (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The major additions made by Tinaj5 on 17 May are very poorly constructed, bordering in places on the nonsensical. A lot of the information seems trvial or redundant, but someone who has the inclination may be able to savlage something. Nick Cooper (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Life After Prison, Line 45

The content referring to the Metalcore band "Mary Bell" is not sourced, displays poor spelling and punctuation, and seems to me to be inappropriately promotional.