Jump to content

Three-mine policy: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎History: expand sentence
Line 10: Line 10:
The policy was abandoned in 1996, after the [[Australian federal election, 1996|1996 federal election]] replaced the Labor Party with [[John Howard]]'s [[Coalition (Australia)|Coalition]] in power.<ref>[http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RP/1997-98/98rp12.htm Beyond the Three Mines - In Situ Uranium Leaching Proposals in South Australia] [[Parliament of Australia]] - Paliament Library: Research Paper 12 1997-98, published: 12 May 1998, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref> The new policy was to develop the country's uranium mining industry and uranium exports.<ref name="Pros" />
The policy was abandoned in 1996, after the [[Australian federal election, 1996|1996 federal election]] replaced the Labor Party with [[John Howard]]'s [[Coalition (Australia)|Coalition]] in power.<ref>[http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RP/1997-98/98rp12.htm Beyond the Three Mines - In Situ Uranium Leaching Proposals in South Australia] [[Parliament of Australia]] - Paliament Library: Research Paper 12 1997-98, published: 12 May 1998, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref> The new policy was to develop the country's uranium mining industry and uranium exports.<ref name="Pros" />


The Australian Labor Party changed back its policy in the 1990s to a "no new mines" policy to allow uranium mines already approved by the Coalition government to go ahead.<ref>[http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/beazleys-mines-gamble/2006/07/24/1153593271714.html?page=fullpage Beazley's mines gamble] ''[[The Age]]'', published: 25 July 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref> With the opening of a fourth uranium mine in Australia in 2001, the [[Beverley uranium mine]], and the approval of a fifth mine, the [[Honeymoon uranium mine]], Labor's stand had essentially become a "five mine policy".<ref name="Mike" />
The Australian Labor Party changed back its policy in the 1990s to a "no new mines" policy to allow uranium mines already approved by the Coalition government to go ahead.<ref>[http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/beazleys-mines-gamble/2006/07/24/1153593271714.html?page=fullpage Beazley's mines gamble] ''[[The Age]]'', published: 25 July 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref> With the opening of a fourth uranium mine in Australia in 2001, the [[Beverley uranium mine]], and the approval of a fifth mine, the [[Honeymoon uranium mine]], Labor's stand had essentially become a "five mine policy", also Nabarlek had since been closed.<ref name="Mike" />


The Labor Party however continued its opposition to increased uranium mining until 2006, when, under the leadership of [[Kim Beazley]], discussions to abandon the three mine policy were initiated.<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200603/s1603682.htm Beazley flags 'three mine' policy debate] ''[[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]'', published: 29 March 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref> The party eventually abandoned the policy in 2007, at a national conference, under the new leadership of [[Kevin Rudd]], but faced heavy internal criticism for it.<ref>[http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/top-stories/labor-abandons-three-mine-policy/story-e6frg12l-1111113430704 Labor abandons "three mine'' policy] perthnow.com.au, published: 27 April 2007, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref>
The Labor Party however continued its opposition to increased uranium mining until 2006, when, under the leadership of [[Kim Beazley]], discussions to abandon the three mine policy were initiated.<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200603/s1603682.htm Beazley flags 'three mine' policy debate] ''[[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]'', published: 29 March 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref> The party eventually abandoned the policy in 2007, at a national conference, under the new leadership of [[Kevin Rudd]], but faced heavy internal criticism for it.<ref>[http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/top-stories/labor-abandons-three-mine-policy/story-e6frg12l-1111113430704 Labor abandons "three mine'' policy] perthnow.com.au, published: 27 April 2007, accessed: 18 February 2011</ref>

Revision as of 11:41, 19 February 2011

The Three mine policy, introduced in 1984 and abandoned in 1996, was a policy of the Government of Australia to limit the number of uranium mines in the country to three.[1][2]

History

The foundations of the three mine policy for uranium mining were laid in 1982, when, at a conference of the Australian Labor Party, the party decided to adopt a "no new mines" policy. At the time, two uranium mines were operating, both in the Northern Territory, Ranger and Nabarlek. However, this new policy left a lupe hole, as it permitted uranium to be mined as a by-product of other mining operations. The later exception allowed for development of the Olympic Dam mine, located in South Australia, as it also contained gold and copper.[2]

The following year, 1983, Labor won the federal elections and came into power, for the first time since 1975.

The three mine policy was officially introduced in 1984, after the federal elections that year had confirmed Bob Hawke of the Labor Party as Prime Minister of Australia. The policy restricted uranium mining in Australia to three existing mines, Ranger, Nabarlek and Olympic Dam.[1]

The policy was abandoned in 1996, after the 1996 federal election replaced the Labor Party with John Howard's Coalition in power.[3] The new policy was to develop the country's uranium mining industry and uranium exports.[1]

The Australian Labor Party changed back its policy in the 1990s to a "no new mines" policy to allow uranium mines already approved by the Coalition government to go ahead.[4] With the opening of a fourth uranium mine in Australia in 2001, the Beverley uranium mine, and the approval of a fifth mine, the Honeymoon uranium mine, Labor's stand had essentially become a "five mine policy", also Nabarlek had since been closed.[2]

The Labor Party however continued its opposition to increased uranium mining until 2006, when, under the leadership of Kim Beazley, discussions to abandon the three mine policy were initiated.[5] The party eventually abandoned the policy in 2007, at a national conference, under the new leadership of Kevin Rudd, but faced heavy internal criticism for it.[6]

Individual states continued their ban on uranium mining however, with Western Australia lifting its six-year old ban in 2008, after state elections, which saw the Labor Party replaced in government by the Liberal Party.[7] Queensland continues to have a ban on uranium mining but trade unions have advocated the end of the ban in the hope of uranium mining creating more jobs.[8]

References

  1. ^ a b c Prospect or suspect – uranium mining in Australia Australian Academy of Science, accessed: 18 February 2011
  2. ^ a b c Mike Steketee: Fierce ALP brawl on uranium policy The Australian, author: Mike Steketee, published: 26 April 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011
  3. ^ Beyond the Three Mines - In Situ Uranium Leaching Proposals in South Australia Parliament of Australia - Paliament Library: Research Paper 12 1997-98, published: 12 May 1998, accessed: 18 February 2011
  4. ^ Beazley's mines gamble The Age, published: 25 July 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011
  5. ^ Beazley flags 'three mine' policy debate Australian Broadcasting Corporation, published: 29 March 2006, accessed: 18 February 2011
  6. ^ Labor abandons "three mine policy perthnow.com.au, published: 27 April 2007, accessed: 18 February 2011
  7. ^ WA closer to having first uranium mine news.ninemsn.com.au, published: 23 July 2009, accessed: 18 February 2011
  8. ^ Union calls for Qld to lift uranium ban The Sydney Morning Herald, published: 16 February 2011, accessed: 18 February 2011
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three-mine_policy&oldid=414768715"