Jump to content

User talk:Renaissancee: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
Line 1,365: Line 1,365:
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 02:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 02:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0143 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0143 -->

== ''The Signpost'': 30 May 2011 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-30}}
</div><!--Volume 7, Issue 22-->
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 20:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0148 -->

Revision as of 20:10, 31 May 2011

Renaissancee (talk) 03:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE : WikiProject Medicine - Hematology and Oncology Task Force

Hi, I dont mind, all I do is for the best of the project, please ask for any help in starting that task force, its gonna be fun, by the way take a look at the cardiology task force, I started, that an tagged most of the articles related, but still there are many more to tag :-) MaenK.A.Talk 06:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Renaissancee. You have new messages at Dottydotdot's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Question

Hi Renaissancee, I noticed that you placed a template on the Ali Said Faqi talkpage, if you believe he deserves an entry on wikipedia, could you please leave your thoughts at this discussion?[1], thanks in advance!--Scoobycentric (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Said Faqi

Dear Renaissancee, thank you for your re-classification of Ali Said Faqi. I was under the impression toxicology would be part of medicine. And I hoped for some input from that WikiProject regarding the AfD discussion by people with knowledge on the subject. Best regards, Crowsnest (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

With regard to the Hey Slavs mediation-I have, in my last post, tried to start moving towards a solution. I would be very interested in your thoughts, especially if I've misunderstood something & got it wrong! Dotty••| 19:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you do me a a favour & look at the Hey, Slavs talk page please & let me know whether you think I have made the right decision-I have a feeling Imbris will not accept it at all & so want to check that you agree with me. Thanks! Dotty••| 16:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No I know we don't give out decisions, yet I felt that in this instance, it was the best way to try & see if we could resolve it, as unfortunately neither side was really going to budge. Dotty••| 16:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the thoughts[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs and stuff

Hi Ren,

I came across your Afd nom for 10/90 gap and have quite staunchly defended it. I then had a little nose around and saw your RfA where one of the comments was that you should work on article building. Can I suggest you withdraw your AfD nom, I can then reduce 10/90 gap to a small, meaningful, compliant article which could then be 5x expanded and nominated at WP:DYK along with Global Forum for Health Research which I resurrected yesterday and needs improving with inline citations. How about it?

I'll keep this on my watchlist, so let me know here.

Cheers, Bigger digger (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that sounds fine to me. Renaissancee (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved your message back here. It makes my head hurt to follow a conversation over multiple talk pages ;-). I'll pare down 10/90 gap to the bear bones as policy allows. You'll need to withdraw the nomination, not quite sure how to do that but I'm sure it tells you somewhere, it just closes early but will preserve the debate with the sources I found. I'll then leave you to improve the article with the sources listed at the AfD and the ones on the talkpage. We can reconvene on Monday to see how we've got on and to nominate the articles for a DYK. I've done some work over at DYK so can rustle up a hook and make sure the articles are shipshape. Does that sound like a plan? Bigger digger (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds lovely, and thanks for the help :o. Renaissancee (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I stumbled across the AFD via WP:MED, and attempted my first non-admin closure. I think it's all handled, but if I mucked it all up, please feel free to fix and berate me mercilessly. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(e/c with Floquenbeam) - I'm looking forward to merciless berating, it's one of my stronger abilities ;-)
No worries. I think I'd be a bit wary of all that Huggle malarkey, but I can see that it's important, so it's only fair that I share some of what I've learnt with you. When I revert an admin because I've got no idea which Huggle button to press I'll come running to you!
I've got 10/90 gap to a base level of 800 bytes of prose. In order to be suitable for a DYK nom it needs to be expanded to 4010 bytes of prose, which is probably about the size beforehand. If you add importScript('User:Shubinator/DYKcheck.js'); to your monobook.js you can see the prose size for yourself using "DYK check" which appears in the toolbox on the left hand column - see User:Shubinator/DYKcheck for more info, but if you can install Huggle I'm sure you'll be fine with it! Then all you need to do is edit the article, complete with inline citations from all the sources. Easy! If you need any more guidance, just write here, or on my talk page, or on the article talk page. I'll catch it wherever. Time to hang up those Huggle goggles and get to sorting out this article! Bigger digger (talk) 21:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<--Only a day to go, no change? Are you going to let this DYK opportunity slip you by? No worries if so, just thought I'd poke you again in an attempt to get someone else (not me!) to improve the article... ;-) Bigger digger (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which succeeded with 56 in support, 12 in opposition and 3 neutral votes. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best, Mifter (talk)

Mifter (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal

Hi there, I noticed that you had were starting to become involved in the mediation cabal, as I would also like to do. I have been looking at older cases, and I was wondering if I could follow you around for a bit, and watch your mediations to gain experience? Also, I stole your mediation notes page, if thats okay with you XD. Let me know if you'd like me to delete it from my personal subpage. MacMedtalkstalk 01:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to have your input here, as it is my first attempt at informal mediation, and I would love to have someone to share ideas with. MacMedtalkstalk 22:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some shameless thankspam!

User:Colds7ream/RfA

WPMED's scope

WPMED's scope includes not only all hospitals and physicians, but all medical agencies, medical journals, healthcare workers, charitable organizations, and related companies -- the whole infrastructure of medicine. You may want to consider the advantages of the conservative approach: assume that any article that has been tagged with a WPMED banner is within the proejct's scope, unless you have been directly told the specific kind of article is no longer within the project's scope.

As always, you can (as I do) leave a message at WT:MEDA for questionable cases. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have noticed that you are also in WikiProject Medicine. As a high school student with a heavy focus on the sciences, and taking a full-day co-op at a hospital next semester, I was wondering if you thought it would be appropriate for me to join the project, or if it should be left with those with more experience (ie doctors, med students, etc.) thanks, MacMedtalkstalk 02:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC) == What article was it that I asked a question in the topic by accident?Omegakingboo (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review dude! I hope that I am not the only one updating it! ^_^--The Wandering TravelerWIKIPROJECT UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT! 14:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate your enthusiasm in nominating Switzerland for FAC, but you must be the primary contributor to do so. I don't think it's ready yet either, see the FAC page. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does this mean you withdraw the nomination? No hard feelings, just need to be sure. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I am lonely will anyone speak to me" thread

If I were to make an page about that thread, what would I call it? I cannot have the name that long can I? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegakingboo (talkcontribs) 17:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA

Just wanted to say that I suspect that WPMED has a number of articles that would meet WP:GA if we could just identify them. If you run across any, please let me know (perhaps at WT:MEDA?) and/or feel free to nominate them yourself. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 1.0 Editorial Team

Hi Renaissancee, Thanks for signing up for the 1.0 Editorial Team. We're currently finishing up Version 0.7 (once the badwords cleanup is complete, we should be ready for publication. We will be starting on Version 0.8 shortly afterwards, and we are hoping to use a script from the Wikitrust people to reduce the "badwords" checking (which has taken me several months so far). I'm hopeful that once that's in place, we'll be able to roll out releases very quickly, and this group will really get quite busy with planning releases and fun things like that. Please can you let me know if you can help out, and if so, where your interest/skills/experience lie. Thanks again, Walkerma (talk) 06:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have continued to work on the list of skin-related conditions, and recently nominated it for FL status. If available, your comments would be greatly appreciated at the nomination page. Regardless, thank you again for your work on wikipedia. ---kilbad (talk) 06:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WPMED tags

I've just found a bunch of WPMED-tagged anatomy articles at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:WikiProject_Medicine. This is a redirect for the actual page, and its presence is usually a good indication that it wasn't tagged/assessed any time recently (and/or by any of the regulars). It looks like there are some 600 articles using this redirect, and they're practically all anatomy pages. If you're interested in weeding a few out, please feel free. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity invite

Just a note on the invite link, I believe with the school link you gave should be to wikiversity:School:Medicine. Also you're missing a |} in your template. You might want to refactor that invite a bit. -Optigan13 (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[2]
No problem. I assumed you used the template on more than just wt:medicine. -Optigan13 (talk) 05:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009


"Hepatitis B carries the greatest risk of transmission, with 37 to 62% of exposed workers eventually showing seroconversion and 22 to 31% showing clinical Hepatitis B infection.[10][11] "

Is this in unvaccinated individuals? Needs clarification, no?. Reference #11 is from 1982 which would've been researched before Hepatavax was available (also 1982). I don't have access to the article to check. I'd think there's also more current information. Thanks.--MartinezMD (talk) 04:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Breast cancer
League of American Orchestras
Institute for OneWorld Health
Periorbital cellulitis
Treponema pallidum
Ammonium cerium(IV) sulfate
Acute-phase protein
Roosevelt High School (Sioux Falls, South Dakota)
Sidney Craig
Bis-triazinyl pyridine
WSAZ-TV
Bromacil
Age adjustment
2-Heptanol
Jenny Craig Pavilion
Empirical formula
Dihydrofolic acid
Quebec law
18-Hydroxycorticosterone
Cleanup
Childbirth
Curing (food preservation)
Werbung
Merge
Orcinol
Foot type
Anemia
Add Sources
Cycloartenol
Sodium adipate
Terbium(III) iodide
Wikify
John Croghan
Showgirls
Retting
Expand
Hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate
Robert Armour
Albuquerque, New Mexico

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:33, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011