Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Cummins: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Thomas Cummins. (TW)
 
delete, insufficient notability and a terribly-worded article to boot
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|Thomas Cummins}})
:({{Find sources|Thomas Cummins}})
Could not find any specific assertions of notability amid the high jargon-density waffle. '''<u>[[User:God Emperor|<em style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;color:Black">God</em> <em style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;color:Red">Emperor</em>]]</u>[[User talk:God Emperor|<em style="color:Blue"><sup>Talk</sup></em>]]''' 17:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Could not find any specific assertions of notability amid the high jargon-density waffle. '''<u>[[User:God Emperor|<em style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;color:Black">God</em> <em style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold;color:Red">Emperor</em>]]</u>[[User talk:God Emperor|<em style="color:Blue"><sup>Talk</sup></em>]]''' 17:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
*Great googly moogly. Deletion process aside, virtually none of the existing text should be permitted to survive a copy-editing. Setting aside that problem, the closest this subject comes to meeting [[WP:ARTIST]] is criterion 4b ("has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition"). And that's only if we're generous enough to consider [http://www.mysanantonio.com/entertainment/visual_arts/article/Blue-Star-exhibit-explores-tension-between-art-654343.php "This is not a photo show"] to be a "significant exhibition" -- or, beyond that, to consider the "Unit B" of that exhibition, located in the home of the exhibition organizer, to be "significant". Personally, I'm not that generous. '''Delete'''. [[User:Serpent's Choice|Serpent's Choice]] ([[User talk:Serpent's Choice|talk]]) 19:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:15, 2 June 2011

Thomas Cummins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any specific assertions of notability amid the high jargon-density waffle. God EmperorTalk 17:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Great googly moogly. Deletion process aside, virtually none of the existing text should be permitted to survive a copy-editing. Setting aside that problem, the closest this subject comes to meeting WP:ARTIST is criterion 4b ("has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition"). And that's only if we're generous enough to consider "This is not a photo show" to be a "significant exhibition" -- or, beyond that, to consider the "Unit B" of that exhibition, located in the home of the exhibition organizer, to be "significant". Personally, I'm not that generous. Delete. Serpent's Choice (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]