Talk:San Francisco Chronicle: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 98.248.113.11 - "→Outing policy?: new section" |
→TV Guide: new section |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Does the paper have an actual or apparent policy on outing? The title of the piece that outed Judge [[Vaughn R. Walker]] was "Judge being gay a nonissue during Prop. 8 trial". Of course if the San Francisco Chronicle staff really thought it was a 'nonissue', it wouldn't have been thusly titled, and wouldn't have been published. This was the height of disingenuity by the Chron itself, which decided to run it after "great debate" involving Matier and Ross and "the paper's editor and publisher". --98.248.113.11 (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.248.113.11|98.248.113.11]] ([[User talk:98.248.113.11|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Does the paper have an actual or apparent policy on outing? The title of the piece that outed Judge [[Vaughn R. Walker]] was "Judge being gay a nonissue during Prop. 8 trial". Of course if the San Francisco Chronicle staff really thought it was a 'nonissue', it wouldn't have been thusly titled, and wouldn't have been published. This was the height of disingenuity by the Chron itself, which decided to run it after "great debate" involving Matier and Ross and "the paper's editor and publisher". --98.248.113.11 (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.248.113.11|98.248.113.11]] ([[User talk:98.248.113.11|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== TV Guide == |
|||
A fairly large paragraph has been recently written because the Chron is changing out it's weekly TV section. In my opinion this change in their TV guide is has no merit whatsoever for inclusion in this article, and if we need it the info could be done in a sentence. But considering the long storied history of the Chron, with all of the changes made to its content and format over the years, this long paragraph about such a trivial change is pointless. --[[User:Fizbin|Fizbin]] ([[User talk:Fizbin|talk]]) 22:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:47, 14 July 2011
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | This article refers to a periodical that doesn't have its ISSN information listed. If you can, please provide it. |
"Bay Guardian" editorial in disguise
NPOV means we include any published criticism, much like we have for other media outlets. We just don't judge whether the criticism is accurate or not. The Bay Guardian criticism is in a legitimate, published, verifiable source, and as such is readded. Calwatch 20:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Including pride of place for one AND ONLY ONE piece of criticism/viewpoint and pretending you're following NPOV isn't the least bit intellectually honest. Try again, and at least PRETEND you understand NPOV. --Calton | Talk 00:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not violate WP:CIVIL, and avoid making personal attacks (least bit intellectually honest). I've decided to add a blurb about conservative criticism. I hope this works. Calwatch 00:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- I have to say that the section doesn't improve the article. For example, no clear evidence is given for the Communist Party assertion, and it's a convoluted argument anyway. I think we should cut both the leftist and rightist criticism down to the basics of their beliefs, since I doubt either of these viewpoints is widely held. - mako 07:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Request for article
Could someone create an article for the famous author for the Chronicle named Joan Ryan? Thanks! Jccort (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- While I don't know if the term "famous author" would cut it with Wiki, nevertheless, if Paul Avery and Charles McCabe get separate articles, I guess Ryan should too. One of us should get to work on it--while the Chron still exists :( Lantana11 (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Circulation is not accurate
The main article says: "today only the Los Angeles Times exceeds the Chronicle's circulation on the West Coast, while the paper is ranked 12th by circulation nationally." But a quick look at "The Oregonian" newspaper in Portland (on Wikipedia) shows a circulation that is greater than the Chronicle. This needs to be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattquist (talk • contribs) 06:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Mattquist (talk) 06:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Outing policy?
Does the paper have an actual or apparent policy on outing? The title of the piece that outed Judge Vaughn R. Walker was "Judge being gay a nonissue during Prop. 8 trial". Of course if the San Francisco Chronicle staff really thought it was a 'nonissue', it wouldn't have been thusly titled, and wouldn't have been published. This was the height of disingenuity by the Chron itself, which decided to run it after "great debate" involving Matier and Ross and "the paper's editor and publisher". --98.248.113.11 (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.248.113.11 (talk)
TV Guide
A fairly large paragraph has been recently written because the Chron is changing out it's weekly TV section. In my opinion this change in their TV guide is has no merit whatsoever for inclusion in this article, and if we need it the info could be done in a sentence. But considering the long storied history of the Chron, with all of the changes made to its content and format over the years, this long paragraph about such a trivial change is pointless. --Fizbin (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Start-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles